kopecpa...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>Hello,
>
>since yesterday (2023-10-25) I received an error during the apt update
>command:
Only since yesterday? Was it working fine previously?
>docker run -it debian:bullseye /bin/bash
>Unable to find image 'debian:bullseye' locally
>bullseye: Pulling from librar
As another data point, I've tried the following:
$ docker run -it debian apt update
$ docker run -it debian:bullseye apt update
$ docker run -it
debian@sha256:c141beaa9e0767774221cc82efe3a6712a1cc4f75d2699334dfd9a28a6f7357b
apt update
And these all complete successfully:
❯ docker run -it
On 5/31/23 14:42, john doe wrote:
On 5/31/23 11:36, Dennis Heddicke wrote:
Yes, after purging apt-cacher-ng the problem was gone. And after i
reinstalled apt-cacher-ng and configured it that way:
For the sake of simplicity and troubleshooting, please modify
sources.list directly.
What does a
On 5/31/23 11:36, Dennis Heddicke wrote:
Yes, after purging apt-cacher-ng the problem was gone. And after i
reinstalled apt-cacher-ng and configured it that way:
For the sake of simplicity and troubleshooting, please modify
sources.list directly.
What does acng.conf look like?
Note that thi
On Wed, 31 May 2023 11:36:19 +0200
Dennis Heddicke wrote:
> Acquire::http {Proxy "http://localhost:3142";};
> Acquire::https {Proxy "http://";};
I'm not comfortable with your second line there. First, you have for
https a non-secure http. I suspect they should match. Second, if you
are going to
Yes, after purging apt-cacher-ng the problem was gone. And after i
reinstalled apt-cacher-ng and configured it that way:
Acquire::http {Proxy "http://localhost:3142";};
Acquire::https {Proxy "http://";};
there are any errors too, although i don't know what caused them. But
thank you for your
On 5/30/23 19:39, Dennis Heddicke wrote:
Hello,
i have a problem with "apt update", everytime i execute the command, i
get the following error messages:
Get:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bookworm-security
InRelease [48,0 kB]
Get:2 http://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm InRelease [
On 10/20/2019 10:41 AM, Reco wrote:
Hi.
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 10:25:27AM -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
I know the the command worked because I can access -i386 applications. However,
when I run:
comp@AbNormal:~$ sudo -s apt update
none of the Debian i386 repositories are li
Hi.
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 10:25:27AM -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> I know the the command worked because I can access -i386 applications.
> However, when I run:
>
> > comp@AbNormal:~$ sudo -s apt update
>
> none of the Debian i386 repositories are listed. Why is this the case?
I
On Thu 21 Jan 2016 at 11:04:18 +, Brian wrote:
> If non-free firmware is provided during the course of using the installer
> the "official" sources.list includes non-free.
A misleading statement. The non-free archive is marked for inclusion but
the user must choose to have it written to sour
On Thu 21 Jan 2016 at 23:10:51 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 05:57:52PM +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> > On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 08:17:42 +1300 Chris Bannister
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 06:18:09PM +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:1
On Wed 20 Jan 2016 at 17:56:53 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 19:34:31 + Brian wrote:
>
> > On Fri 15 Jan 2016 at 09:54:30 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:08:53 +
> > > Brian wrote:
> > >
> > > > http.debian.net/debian/
> > > >
> > > > is e
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 05:57:52PM +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 08:17:42 +1300 Chris Bannister
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 06:18:09PM +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
> > > Amr Saber wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi there,
> > > > While I w
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 19:34:31 + Brian wrote:
> On Fri 15 Jan 2016 at 09:54:30 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:08:53 +
> > Brian wrote:
> >
> > > http.debian.net/debian/
> > >
> > > is exactly the same as
> > >
> > > httpredir.debian.org/debian/
> > >
> > > The
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 08:17:42 +1300 Chris Bannister
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 06:18:09PM +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
> > Amr Saber wrote:
> >
> > > Hi there,
> > > While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as
> > > apt-get couldn't ge
On Fri 15 Jan 2016 at 09:54:30 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:08:53 +
> Brian wrote:
>
> > http.debian.net/debian/
> >
> > is exactly the same as
> >
> > httpredir.debian.org/debian/
> >
> > The .org indicates it is an official, supported mirror but it makes no
> > dif
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 06:18:09PM +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
> Amr Saber wrote:
>
> > Hi there,
> > While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
> > couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
> > spelling for
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:08:53 +
Brian wrote:
> On Thu 14 Jan 2016 at 18:18:09 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
> > Amr Saber wrote:
> >
> > > Hi there,
> > > While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as
> > > apt-get couldn't get any pac
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:36:33PM -0600, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
> On Wed, January 13, 2016 12:31 pm, Amr Saber wrote:
> > The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally deleted
> > and I can't find any version of it online
>
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ jessie main non-f
On Thu 14 Jan 2016 at 18:18:09 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
> Amr Saber wrote:
>
> > Hi there,
> > While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
> > couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
> > spelling for ea
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
Amr Saber wrote:
> Hi there,
> While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
> couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
> spelling for each package) and it just said package not found ...
> any way, The proble
On Thu 14 Jan 2016 at 09:39:26 +0530, Udyant Wig wrote:
> On 01/14/2016 02:08 AM, Brian wrote:
> > On Wed 13 Jan 2016 at 12:36:33 -0600, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, January 13, 2016 12:31 pm, Amr Saber wrote:
> >>> The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally deleted
On 01/14/2016 02:08 AM, Brian wrote:
> On Wed 13 Jan 2016 at 12:36:33 -0600, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
>
>> On Wed, January 13, 2016 12:31 pm, Amr Saber wrote:
>>> The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally deleted
>>> and I can't find any version of it online
>>
>> deb http://ftp.
On 01/13/2016 06:10 PM, Jochen Spieker wrote:
Jose Martinez:
Lisi, where can you get the authentication signature for the the
mozilla.debian.net repository??
I am not Lisi, but have you considered just going straight to
http://mozilla.debian.net/? :)
J.
Hmmm...What a novel idea!!
--
Qu
On Thursday 14 January 2016 00:10:17 Jochen Spieker wrote:
> Jose Martinez:
> > Lisi, where can you get the authentication signature for the the
> > mozilla.debian.net repository??
>
> I am not Lisi, but have you considered just going straight to
> http://mozilla.debian.net/? :)
You beat me to it,
Jose Martinez:
>
> Lisi, where can you get the authentication signature for the the
> mozilla.debian.net repository??
I am not Lisi, but have you considered just going straight to
http://mozilla.debian.net/? :)
J.
--
When you put a gun to my head you aren't fooling anyone.
[Agree] [Disagree]
On 01/13/2016 05:38 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Wednesday 13 January 2016 23:22:30 David Christensen wrote:
On 01/13/2016 10:31 AM, Amr Saber wrote:
Hi there,
While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked t
I really cant thank you all enough :)
On 14 Jan 2016 01:39, "Lisi Reisz" wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 January 2016 23:22:30 David Christensen wrote:
> > On 01/13/2016 10:31 AM, Amr Saber wrote:
> > > Hi there,
> > > While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
> > > couldn't
On Wednesday 13 January 2016 23:22:30 David Christensen wrote:
> On 01/13/2016 10:31 AM, Amr Saber wrote:
> > Hi there,
> > While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
> > couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
> > spelling for each package)
On 01/13/2016 10:31 AM, Amr Saber wrote:
Hi there,
While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
spelling for each package) and it just said package not found ...
You can search for packages here:
On 01/13/2016 02:38 PM, Charlie Kravetz wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
Amr Saber wrote:
Hi there,
While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
spelling for each package) and it just said
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
Amr Saber wrote:
>Hi there,
>While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
>couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
>spelling for each package) and it just said package not found ...
>any way, The problem is
On Wed 13 Jan 2016 at 12:36:33 -0600, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
> On Wed, January 13, 2016 12:31 pm, Amr Saber wrote:
> > The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally deleted
> > and I can't find any version of it online
>
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ jessie main non-free
On Wed, January 13, 2016 12:31 pm, Amr Saber wrote:
> The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally deleted
> and I can't find any version of it online
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ jessie main non-free contrib
deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ jessie main non-free contr
Thank you guys for the fast response. I guess Sven is right. This makes
my problem a 'somebody else's problem' (our webserver admins).
regards
Eugen
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 22:58 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2013-03-18 21:54 +0100, Eugen Wintersberger wrote:
>
> > I have a problem with one
Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2013-03-18 21:54 +0100, Eugen Wintersberger wrote:
I have a problem with one of my private apt repositories. I created
the repo using reprepro on my public www directory.
I can access the repository with my browser (you can find it below
http://www.desy.de/~wintersb/a
On 2013-03-18 21:54 +0100, Eugen Wintersberger wrote:
> I have a problem with one of my private apt repositories. I created
> the repo using reprepro on my public www directory.
> I can access the repository with my browser (you can find it below
> http://www.desy.de/~wintersb/apt/debian ). Aft
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:54:27 +0100
Eugen Wintersberger wrote:
> Hi folks
> I have a problem with one of my private apt repositories. I created
> the repo using reprepro on my public www directory.
> I can access the repository with my browser (you can find it below
> http://www.desy.de/~winter
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 10:52:48 +
Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 09:40:10PM +, Richard wrote:
> > Hi
> > All downloads , but I'm getting this:-
> >
> > Setting up initscripts (2.88dsf-22) ...
> > insserv: warning: script 'K50vmware-USBArbitrator' missing LSB tags and
> > ove
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 09:40:10PM +, Richard wrote:
> Hi
> All downloads , but I'm getting this:-
>
> Setting up initscripts (2.88dsf-22) ...
> insserv: warning: script 'K50vmware-USBArbitrator' missing LSB tags and
> overrides
> insserv: warning: script 'K01vmware' missing LSB tags and over
Lázaro Morales wrote:
> Err http://security.debian.org squeeze/updates Release.gpg
> Could not connect to security.debian.org:80 (149.20.20.6). - connect
> (110: Connection timed out) [IP: 149.20.20.6 80]
Is this machine behind some type of firewall that is blocking outbound
connections? Look
Thanks for your replies,
After posting in the mailing list, I tried commenting line containing
debian-volatile, but I get this new error:
Err http://security.debian.org squeeze/updates Release.gpg
Could not connect to security.debian.org:80 (149.20.20.6). - connect
(110: Connection timed
Hi, ¿do you have debian-volatile in sources.list?
Delete (or comment) that line and try again.
See
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=60268
Greetings,
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 02:24:03PM -0400, Lázaro Morales wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After a fresh install of Debian Squeeze I try to update
On Mon 01 Aug 2011 at 14:24:03 -0400, Lázaro Morales wrote:
> After a fresh install of Debian Squeeze I try to update the system's
> packages cache with:
>
> # apt-get update
>
> And I get the following error:
>
> Failed to exec method /usr/lib/apt/methods/
> Failed to exec method /usr/lib/apt/
On Friday 15 April 2011 23:49:24 Christian Jakob wrote:
> Can anyone change status of this post to SOLVED ?!
You can - just add SOLVED to the subject line!! It is usually put at the
beginning.
I have done it for you. It is no more complicated than it is to start the
thread in the first place,
>>There is only one question left:
>>Why did this happen? What could I have done, that these values changed to
>>-1?
>
>I don't know any tool that edits that file. I always edit it with (sudo -e
>/etc/apt/preferences). So, my assumption is that you made the change
>yourself, perhaps without knowing
In <1393449085.44289.1302886728608.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb037>, Christian Jakob
wrote:
>>You've pinned all your available repositories to a negative value. APT
>>refuses to install any package with a negative priority, which is why none
>>of your packages have installation candidates.
>>
>>Check /
>You've pinned all your available repositories to a negative value. APT
>refuses to install any package with a negative priority, which is why none of
>your packages have installation candidates.
>
>Check /etc/apt/preferences and /etc/apt/preferences.d/*; you've got at least
>on stanza wrong in
In <406058322.9701.1302882000282.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb034>, Christian Jakob
wrote:
>root@debian # apt-cache policy
>Package files:
> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
> release a=now
> -1 http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/contrib Packages
> release v=5.0,o=Debian,a=oldstable,l=Debian-Security,c=c
TO: scot..
>Um, fsck did what?
First there came a WARNING: sd2 is mounted ... blabla
Then something like this:
/dev/sda2: recovering journal
/dev/sda2: clean, ... files, ... blocks
For me this looked like fsck didn't do anything...
But, I think there is no hardwa
On 15/04/11 01:07, Christian Jakob wrote:
> fsck did something, but it doesn't fix the problem ...
Um, fsck did what?
Did it simply optimise directories - or did the file system need repairing?
Did it test the ability of the drive to retain data - find some sections
where failing and add them to t
On 14/04/11 15:46, Christian Jakob wrote:
>> Before trying to replace apt... how about trying a manual install of
>> scons and posting the output?
>
> root@debian # dpkg -i scons_1.0.0-1_all.deb
Selecting previously deselected package scons.
(Reading database ... 175 901 files and directories cur
(TOFU corrected. In general, this list prefers well-trimmed posts with
replies interleaved or underneath the quoted context. Some prefer top-
posting, but I think everyone with an opinion desires posts to be well-
trimmed.)
In <998647986.2435386.1302844626401.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb033>, Christia
root@debian # apt-get update
Hit http://security.debian.org lenny/updates Release.gpg
Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny Release.gpg
Hit http://security.debian.org lenny/updates Release
Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny Release
Ign http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/main Packages/DiffIndex
I
In <1038309152.3627061.1302793651098.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb038>, Christian
Jakob wrote:
>fsck did something, but it doesn't fix the problem ...
>
>root@debian # dpkg -l | grep aptitude
>root@debian # apt-get install aptitude
>Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
>Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut
>L
fsck did something, but it doesn't fix the problem ...
root@debian # dpkg -l | grep aptitude
root@debian # apt-get install aptitude
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut
Lese Status-Informationen ein... Fertig
Paket aptitude ist nicht verfügbar, wird aber von einem
>Before trying to replace apt... how about trying a manual install of
>scons and posting the output?
root@debian # dpkg -i scons_1.0.0-1_all.deb
Wähle vormals abgewähltes Paket scons.
(Lese Datenbank ... 175901 Dateien und Verzeichnisse sind derzeit installiert.)
Entpacke scons (aus scons_1.0.0-1_
On 14/04/11 02:59, Christian Jakob wrote:
>> scott@work:~$ python -V
>> Python 2.5.2
>
> this is the same as mine...
>
> root@debian # python -V
> Python 2.5.2
You appear to have all the listed dependancies
>
>> Have you manually installed scons?
>> Did it throw up any errors?
>
> No I d
>Had you temporarily used other repositories around that time?
No, /etc/apt/sources.list~ is empty.
>The dependencies for scons are python... could it be that you have some
>non-standard python on your system??
>Occasionally I've had install problems because I'd forgotten that I'd
>temporarily ma
On 13/04/11 02:26, Christian Jakob wrote:
> Ok, first of all: Thank you for helping me!
>
>> There's the clue.
>> If you can't remember what happened then (mixed repositories, aborted
>> install, bodgied compile etc) then maybe it's something you don't know
>> about
>
> Yes, I can not remembe
Ok, first of all: Thank you for helping me!
>There's the clue.
>If you can't remember what happened then (mixed repositories, aborted
>install, bodgied compile etc) then maybe it's something you don't know
>about
Yes, I can not remember what I did wrong last time I used Debian.
Maybe it is im
On 12/04/11 15:38, Christian Jakob wrote:
> Good morning,
>
>
> No, the problem occurs since a few weeks/months and not only with this
> package...
There's the clue.
If you can't remember what happened then (mixed repositories, aborted
install, bodgied compile etc) then maybe it's something y
Good morning,
>The only things I can think of are:-
>;temporary problem with the repository (it certainly works at the time
>of writing this)
>;your apt database is corrupted
>;weird dependency problem/conflicts
>
>Any non-Lenny perl on your system?
No, the problem occurs since a few weeks/month
On 12/04/11 04:48, Christian Jakob wrote:
> Hi @all,
>
>
> Normally I can handle debian problems by my own, but this time I have a
> really unusual problem with apt-get.
> I use german version of lenny on a 32 bit i386 architecture.
> Internet connection works fine and public keys are up-to-date
Op 13-07-10 19:12, PRAKHAR gaur schreef:
> --Forwarded Message Attachment--
> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:38:41 +0200
> From: sjo...@lorentz.leidenuniv.nl
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Problem with apt-get --
>
> PRAKHAR gaur schreef:
>>>&g
From: prakhar_aaid...@hotmail.com
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Problem with apt-get --
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:42:21 +0530
--Forwarded Message Attachment--
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:38:41
+0200
From: sjo...@lorentz.leidenuniv.nl
To:
debian-user@lists.debian.org
--Forwarded Message Attachment--
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:38:41
+0200
From: sjo...@lorentz.leidenuniv.nl
To:
debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Problem with apt-get --
PRAKHAR gaur schreef:
>>>You might also add:
>>>export ftp_proxy=$http_proxy
>>
>>
PRAKHAR gaur schreef:
You might also add:
export ftp_proxy=$http_proxy
Ok.
But now there is a slight problem, when ever I use "sudo apt-get update",
it does not work. but if I become root first, using "su", and then so the same
thing, it works.
I tried closing all the terminals and opening
Dear Liam,
>Probably one of your configuration files was replaced during the upgrade. The
>original will have been preserved with the extension
>.dpkg-old.
I installed the OS again, did not upgrade it.
>You might also add:
>export ftp_proxy=$http_proxy
Ok.
But now there is a slight proble
On 2010-07-13, PRAKHAR gaur wrote:
> --_7a55ae90-0232-4da2-b05b-00081b0cad13_
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>
> Dear Liam=2C=20
>
> apt-get used to work before so I was not able to figure out there might be =
> a problem with the p
On 2010-07-13, PRAKHAR gaur wrote:
> --_5b50f58c-d645-427a-a81a-d158616ad201_
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear All=2C
>
> I am using Debian 5.0.5=2C on a x86 machine. The Network is through a DHCP =
> server. For co
* Long Wind [2009-04-01 09:42:23 +0800]:
> When apt-get installs a package
> it will install packages that the package depends
> When I remove the package, the depended packages are not removed.
>
> Is there a command (or a way) to remove the depended packages?
Try with apt-log: http://mavior.e
On 2009-03-31 20:42, Long Wind wrote:
When apt-get installs a package
it will install packages that the package depends
When I remove the package, the depended packages are not removed.
Really? Whenever that happens to me, apt-get suggests that I run
"apt-get autoremove" to delete such packag
* Michael Ekstrand [2009-03-31 21:20:51 -0500]:
> Do be careful, though, that you don't let it remove important things
> that you use :).
Like, all of gnome. I've done that before...
--
Cheers,
Dave
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Long Wind writes:
> When apt-get installs a package
> it will install packages that the package depends
> When I remove the package, the depended packages are not removed.
>
> Is there a command (or a way) to remove the depended packages?
Use Aptitude. When Aptitude installs a package, the depen
The computer has connected to the router but it has a
static IP address. The apt-get command has worked
fine before.
When I run 'apt-get update', it doesn't complain about
sources.list format problem.
--- "Mumia W.."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Your sources.list, as posted, isn't formatted
On 09/25/2007 12:49 PM, Steve Lam wrote:
I have a problem with 'apt-get update' command and it
bugs me for weeks. I've tried to update Debian with
the command 'apt-get update' and it failed to fetch
packages. I've fixed the etc/apt/sources.list file but
It doesn't help me at all. I've tried apt
I've replace 'sarge' with 'oldstable' once. Now I try
again and apt-get update gives the same result: Failed
to fetch packages 404 not found. Here is the output
from apt-get update:
Err http://debian.yorku.ca oldstable/main Packages 404
Not Found
Err http://security.debian.org oldstable/updates/ma
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Steve Lam wrote:
I have a problem with 'apt-get update' command and it
bugs me for weeks. I've tried to update Debian with
the command 'apt-get update' and it failed to fetch
packages. I've fixed the etc/apt/sources.list file but
It doesn't help me at all. I've tried apt-s
Kaspar Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Liam and Ismael,
>
> Thanks a lot for your answers; I read the article
>
>http://jaqque.sbih.org/kplug/apt-pinning.html
>
> about apt pinning and set up my /etc/apt/preferences
> according to this -- great.
>
> Also, I used apt-show-versions to f
Liam and Ismael,
Thanks a lot for your answers; I read the article
http://jaqque.sbih.org/kplug/apt-pinning.html
about apt pinning and set up my /etc/apt/preferences
according to this -- great.
Also, I used apt-show-versions to find the packages from
unstable:
backup:/mnt# apt-get remove gc
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:09:05 +0200
Kaspar Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I have a very basic problem and would be glad to be pointed into
> the right direction: Some time ago, I installed debian-sarge and
> was forced to install a version of samba that was only available
>
Kaspar Fischer escribe:
> How can I do this, i.e., tell apt-get to uninstall everything
> from unstable and install "the same" packages from the stable
> tree? I currently end up having tons of dependency/etc. problems.
Google for apt pinning. In an ideal world, you can roll back your
system to st
Am 2006-03-15 13:23:07, schrieb Michael Ott:
> Hello!
>
> I want to install java on my Sarge.
>
> I put the line finding in the Debian Java FAQ and start
> apt-get update.
>
> And i got this error message:
> Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org stable/main Release
> Err ftp://ftp.tux.org stable/non-free
"Michael Ott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ftp://ftp.tux.org stable/non-free Packages
> Protocol corruption
I'm pretty sure you've got the ftp URL wrong.
Can you go back to the source of the info and check the URL?
Nic Ferrier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
Mehmet Fatih AKBULUT wrote:
hi all,
i cannot apt-get update, upgrade or apt-cache search.
get errors below :
debian:~# apt-cache search
E: Couldn't make mmap of 134217728 bytes - mmap (12 Cannot allocate
memory)
W: Unable to munmap
debian:~# apt-get update
.
.
Reading package lists... Err
On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 02:17:09PM +0800, Chong Zan Kai wrote:
>And some more, my base-config i missing again...
>
>The output:
>debian:/# su
>debian:/# base-config
>bash: base-config: command not found
My base-config was removed due to dependencies/conflicts when updating
to Sid. Just try install
On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 02:00:28PM +0800, Chong Zan Kai wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Recently I have upgraded my Debian from sarge to Sid. However, i found that
>apt-get does not work anymore. Any one can tell me what to do?
Does your network work at all?
/M
--
Magnus Therning(OpenPGP: 0x
And some more, my base-config i missing again...The output:debian:/# sudebian:/# base-configbash: base-config: command not foundOn 1/28/06,
Chong Zan Kai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,Recently I have upgraded my Debian from sarge to Sid. However, i found that apt-get does not work anymore. Any one
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 09:57:54AM -0600, Sergio Cuéllar Valdés wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I make an apt-get update I get an error concerning a gpg key:
>
>
> W: GPG error: http://http.us.debian.org testing Release: The following
> signatures were invalid: BADSIG F1D53D8C4F368D5D Debian Archive
> Aut
Sergio Cuéllar Valdés wrote:
>Yesterday I didnt have this problem.
>
>
Ask google,.. view the archieve.
Chris.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christian Renz wrote:
> apt-get wants to install libc6_2.3.2.ds1-18_sparc.deb (to replace
> libc6-2.3.2-7). However, the installation aborts telling me that "You
> have a cpu which requires kernel 2.4.21 or greater in order to
> install this version of glibc." I tried to fix it by installing
> ker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 05 September 2004 07:15, Paul E Condon wrote:
> When attempting to run apt-get update, I get the following error
>
> Reading Package Lists... Error!
> E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
> E: Error occured while processing python-vtk (NewVersion1
On Thursday 02 September 2004 09:39, Matthew Singerman wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was attempting to install KDE yesterday, but it died halfway through. I
> am now running into very silly problems. When I try it again, I get the
> following:
>
> # apt-get install kde
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Bu
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:10:19 -0600
Brad Camroux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Reading Package Lists... 1%
> Reading Package Lists... 16%
> Reading Package Lists... 32%
> Reading Package Lists... 49%
> Reading Package Lists... 62%
> Reading Package Lists... Error!
> E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Nelson E. Castillo wrote:
I Think you don't use the kernel-patch package
unless you compile a Kernel yourself. The 2.4.18
version doesn't say much, since they append a
trailing number to the package with each update. I
think it's ok if you use the last binary (precom
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 07:08:33AM -0800, Billy Pilgrim wrote:
> > vmlinux-2.4.18-newpmac
> > Package: kernel-patch-2.4.18-powerpc
I gave you the wrong advice.
I Think you don't use the kernel-patch package unless you
compile a Kernel yourself. The 2.4.18 version doesn't say
much, s
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:24:18PM -0800, Billy
Pilgrim wrote:
...
> vmlinux-2.4.18-newpmac
...
> Package: kernel-patch-2.4.18-powerpc
As you can see, the packages names differ. Maybe you
don't
have a default kernel installed but one you (or
someone
else) compiled. That's what
Hi.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:24:18PM -0800, Billy Pilgrim wrote:
...
> vmlinux-2.4.18-newpmac
...
> Package: kernel-patch-2.4.18-powerpc
As you can see, the packages names differ. Maybe you don't
have a default kernel installed but one you (or someone
else) compiled. That's w
On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 20:53, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 17:48:00 +1100, Brian Poole wrote:
>
> > I created sources.list manually.
>
> .. as is obvious once I look at it closely. Is that mixture of stable,
> testing and unstable with good intentions and I assume you know what you
> ar
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
