On Mon, Jan 26, 1998 at 01:53:01PM -0600, Jeff Noxon wrote:
> >
> > And it worked using pap-secrets:
> >
> > * hostname "" *
>
> FYI, I'm using lines like:
>
> jeff * "" *
> steve * "" *
> tom * "" *
>
> Since I don't want all my accounts to be PPP-able.
>
I started this whole thread, so I might as well chime in now. :-)
On Mon, Jan 26, 1998 at 07:59:17PM +0100, Sergio Talens-Oliag wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 1998 at 09:58:40AM +, Philip Hands wrote:
> > > I can verify that turning off shadow passwords fixes the PAP problem.
> > > This is unaccept
On Thu, Jan 15, 1998 at 09:58:40AM +, Philip Hands wrote:
> > I can verify that turning off shadow passwords fixes the PAP problem.
> > This is unacceptable. And it's already reported in bug 16044. Oh well.
I've found the problem and it's really a silly thing: the binary
package for ppp_2
Hello Phil,
On Thu, 15 Jan 1998, Philip Hands wrote:
> > I can verify that turning off shadow passwords fixes the PAP problem.
> > This is unacceptable. And it's already reported in bug 16044. Oh well.
>
> It this the case with ppp-pam installed ?
With or without. Tried both.
> If you are u
> I can verify that turning off shadow passwords fixes the PAP problem.
> This is unacceptable. And it's already reported in bug 16044. Oh well.
It this the case with ppp-pam installed ?
If you are using ppp for dial-in, with PAP authentication, I was assuming that
people will be using PAM to
I can verify that turning off shadow passwords fixes the PAP problem.
This is unacceptable. And it's already reported in bug 16044. Oh well.
On Thu, Jan 15, 1998 at 03:10:26AM +0100, Peter Gervai wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jan 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> > > [PAP not working with ppp 2.3.2]
> > >
On Thu, 15 Jan 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > [PAP not working with ppp 2.3.2]
> > > # magic fix
> > > * * "" *
>
> > This magic fix doesn't work on 2.3.2; I tried it before and I tried it
> > again.
>
> Package: ppp
> Status: install ok installed
> Priority: optional
> Section
On Wed, Jan 14, 1998 at 07:46:41PM -0600, Jeff Noxon wrote:
> [PAP not working with ppp 2.3.2]
> On Thu, Jan 15, 1998 at 10:34:01AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > I had this problem; PAP just didn't damn well work. For me, the fix was
> > to add the following to pap-secrets:
> >
> > # magic fix
[PAP not working with ppp 2.3.2]
On Thu, Jan 15, 1998 at 10:34:01AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> I had this problem; PAP just didn't damn well work. For me, the fix was
> to add the following to pap-secrets:
>
> # magic fix
> * * "" *
>
> Someone on one of the linux mailing lis
Rick Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Peter Iannarelli wrote:
> >
> > In pap-secrets I has to adjust the following line.
> >
> > * *""
> >
> This kind of entry would allow everybody access to your system without a
> password. So Joe down the street who knows a username but doe
On Wed, Jan 14, 1998 at 04:27:26PM -0600, Jeff Noxon wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 1998 at 10:50:09PM +0100, Gergely Madarasz wrote:
> >login Use the system password database for authenticating
> > the peer using PAP, and record the user in the sys-
> > tem wtmp file
Peter Iannarelli wrote:
>
> Hello Guys:
>
> It took me some time to get dial-in ppp working as well.
>
> In pap-secrets I has to adjust the following line.
>
> * beagle ""
>
> to
>
> * *""
>
> Peter
This kind of entry would allow everybody access to your system without
IL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Jeff Noxon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Wednesday, January 14, 1998 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: Problem dialing in w/AutoPPP/PAP! Help!
>On Wed, 14 Jan 1998, Peter Gervai wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 14 Jan 1998, Jeff Noxon wrote:
>>
On Wed, Jan 14, 1998 at 10:50:09PM +0100, Gergely Madarasz wrote:
>login Use the system password database for authenticating
> the peer using PAP, and record the user in the sys-
> tem wtmp file. Note that the peer must have an
> entry in th
On Wed, 14 Jan 1998, Peter Gervai wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 1998, Jeff Noxon wrote:
>
> > > > pppd[24325]: pppd 2.3.2 started by LOGIN, uid 0
> > > [...]
> > > > pppd[24325]: rcvd [PAP AuthReq id=0x1 user="pierre"
> > > > password=""]
> > > > pppd[24325]: PAP authentication failure for pierre
> >
On Wed, 14 Jan 1998, Jeff Noxon wrote:
> > > pppd[24325]: pppd 2.3.2 started by LOGIN, uid 0
> > [...]
> > > pppd[24325]: rcvd [PAP AuthReq id=0x1 user="pierre" password=""]
> > > pppd[24325]: PAP authentication failure for pierre
> > > pppd[24325]: sent [PAP AuthNak id=0x1 "Login incorrect"]
> >
On Wed, Jan 14, 1998 at 10:26:12PM +0100, Peter Gervai wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 1998, Jeff Noxon wrote:
>
> > pppd[24325]: pppd 2.3.2 started by LOGIN, uid 0
> [...]
> > pppd[24325]: rcvd [PAP AuthReq id=0x1 user="pierre" password=""]
> > pppd[24325]: PAP authentication failure for pierre
> > pppd[
On Wed, 14 Jan 1998, Jeff Noxon wrote:
> pppd[24325]: pppd 2.3.2 started by LOGIN, uid 0
[...]
> pppd[24325]: rcvd [PAP AuthReq id=0x1 user="pierre" password=""]
> pppd[24325]: PAP authentication failure for pierre
> pppd[24325]: sent [PAP AuthNak id=0x1 "Login incorrect"]
> pppd[24325]: sent [LCP
On Wed, 14 Jan 1998, Jeff Noxon wrote:
I have exactly the same question! Upgraded from 2.2.0f to 2.3.2 and PAP
stopped working from /etc/shadow. I thought it's libpam0g but after
installing them all it still does not work.
If you - or anyone - get the answer I'd be very interested as well!
> I'm
19 matches
Mail list logo
