On Saturday 12 November 2016 10:50:42 Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Maybe one should install a warning sign at the archive to tell
> future readers that there is nearly no info about xorriso in this
> thread.
17 about xorriso and permissions (presenting problem often not the real
problem, and that may
On Saturday 12 November 2016 05:50:42 Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [pissing contest and associated difficulties]
>
> Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > How the heck did this thread degenerate to this?
>
> Curt wrote:
> > I degenerated it, I'm afraid.
>
> An uprise of the progressive youth against us old
Hi,
[pissing contest and associated difficulties]
Gene Heskett wrote:
> > How the heck did this thread degenerate to this?
Curt wrote:
> I degenerated it, I'm afraid.
An uprise of the progressive youth against us old farts ?
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/53/ca/af/53caafee1d123414aa
On 2016-11-11, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 11 November 2016 05:07:42 Curt wrote:
>
>> On 2016-11-10, Richard Owlett wrote:
>> > It may be close, I pre-date the Harvard MarkI. I am definitely
>> > older than Linus Torvalds father ;)
>>
>> Is this the senile equivalent of a pissing contest? Or
On Friday 11 November 2016 05:07:42 Curt wrote:
> On 2016-11-10, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > It may be close, I pre-date the Harvard MarkI. I am definitely
> > older than Linus Torvalds father ;)
>
> Is this the senile equivalent of a pissing contest? Or the pissing
> equivalent of a senile contest
On Friday 11 November 2016 10:07:42 Curt wrote:
> On 2016-11-10, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > It may be close, I pre-date the Harvard MarkI. I am definitely
> > older than Linus Torvalds father ;)
>
> Is this the senile equivalent of a pissing contest? Or the pissing
> equivalent of a senile contest?
On 2016-11-10, Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> It may be close, I pre-date the Harvard MarkI. I am definitely
> older than Linus Torvalds father ;)
>>
Is this the senile equivalent of a pissing contest? Or the pissing
equivalent of a senile contest?
--
“It is enough that the arrows fit exactly in th
On 11/10/2016 9:49 PM, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 10 Nov 2016 at 17:05:06 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
On 11/10/2016 1:52 PM, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 10 Nov 2016 at 04:53:47 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
Yes, but not in the context of a sub-project from last few days.
I suspect what I a
On Thu 10 Nov 2016 at 17:05:06 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 11/10/2016 1:52 PM, David Wright wrote:
> >On Thu 10 Nov 2016 at 04:53:47 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
> >
> >>Yes, but not in the context of a sub-project from last few days.
> >>I suspect what I aiming at might look like - the g
On Thursday 10 November 2016 22:56:41 Richard Owlett wrote:
> I pre-date the Harvard MarkI
But not, I think, Colossus.
Lisi
On 11/10/2016 1:52 PM, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 10 Nov 2016 at 04:53:47 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
Yes, but not in the context of a sub-project from last few days.
I suspect what I aiming at might look like - the groups and
permission bits set at time partition created, thus avoiding game
On 11/10/2016 9:41 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
Well, let's see if I can shed some light here. Probably not, but
I'll try.
[snip detailed essay]
Yes, you did shed needed light.
Thank you.
On 11/10/2016 8:53 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Thursday 10 November 2016 10:53:47 Richard Owlett wrote:
On 11/9/2016 5:16 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Sunday 06 November 2016 16:47:00 Richard Owlett wrote:
[snip]
Based on responses to previous posts titled "Trivial script will
NOT execute" and "Permi
On Thu 10 Nov 2016 at 04:53:47 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
> Yes, but not in the context of a sub-project from last few days.
> I suspect what I aiming at might look like - the groups and
> permission bits set at time partition created, thus avoiding games
> with /etc/fstab .
>
> richard@jessi
Thanks, Greg! That's brilliant! \o/
Lisi
On Thursday 10 November 2016 15:41:02 Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 02:53:14PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > Richard - are you clear that the permissions are not for the partitions
> > but for the directories on the mount points on the fil
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 02:53:14PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> Richard - are you clear that the permissions are not for the partitions but
> for the directories on the mount points on the filing system on which those
> partitions have been hung?? This can be hard to grasp, but it can and does
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 02:53:14PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Thursday 10 November 2016 10:53:47 Richard Owlett wrote:
> > On 11/9/2016 5:16 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > On Sunday 06 November 2016 16:47:00 Richard Owlett wrote:
> > >> [snip]
> > >> B
On Thursday 10 November 2016 10:53:47 Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 11/9/2016 5:16 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Sunday 06 November 2016 16:47:00 Richard Owlett wrote:
> >> [snip]
> >> Based on responses to previous posts titled "Trivial script will
> >> NOT execute" and "Permissions for an entire PART
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 08:27:58AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 11/10/2016 7:58 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> >>I don't understand.
> >
> >Hm. Too concise (both of us ;-)
> >
> >I'll give it a shot. By "you" I meant "user owl, i.e. any pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 07:40:06AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 11/10/2016 5:20 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 04:53:47AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >>On 11/9/2016
On 11/10/2016 5:20 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 04:53:47AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 11/9/2016 5:16 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Sunday 06 November 2016 16:47:00 Richard Owlett wrote:
[snip]
Based on responses to previous
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 04:53:47AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 11/9/2016 5:16 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> >On Sunday 06 November 2016 16:47:00 Richard Owlett wrote:
> >>[snip]
> >>Based on responses to previous posts titled "Trivial script will
> >>N
On 11/9/2016 5:16 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Sunday 06 November 2016 16:47:00 Richard Owlett wrote:
[snip]
Based on responses to previous posts titled "Trivial script will
NOT execute" and "Permissions for an entire PARTITION" I have
multiple problems understanding Linux file systems generally.
On Sunday 06 November 2016 16:47:00 Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 11/4/2016 3:04 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Richard Owlett's xorriso wrote:
> >> xorriso : FAILURE : Cannot write all bytes to disk filesystem path
> >> '/media/myrepo/pool/main/n/ns3/ns3-doc_3.17+dfsg-1_all.deb' : No space
Hi,
Richard Owlett wrote:
> Evidently xorriso does EXACTLY what told to do
> *NOT* what operator _THOUGHT_ he had told it to do ;/ <*ROFL*>
That's the curse of being a king with absolutely loyal subjetcs.
> a graphical display of
> that I had no space left and gave me an option to forcibly dele
On 11/4/2016 3:04 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
Hi,
Richard Owlett's xorriso wrote:
xorriso : FAILURE : Cannot write all bytes to disk filesystem path
'/media/myrepo/pool/main/n/ns3/ns3-doc_3.17+dfsg-1_all.deb' : No space left on
device
...
xorriso : aborting : -abort_on 'FAILURE' encountered 'FA
Hi,
Richard Owlett's xorriso wrote:
> xorriso : FAILURE : Cannot write all bytes to disk filesystem path
> '/media/myrepo/pool/main/n/ns3/ns3-doc_3.17+dfsg-1_all.deb' : No space left
> on device
> ...
> xorriso : aborting : -abort_on 'FAILURE' encountered 'FAILURE'
Looks like the filesystem to
27 matches
Mail list logo
