Hi Alan,
On 20 Jul 2010, at 12:52, Alan Chandler wrote:
> Lets take this back to the list - not keep it between us - and I am
> subscribed to the list so no need to copy me.
Ah. Sorry. I didn't realise I had only mailed you directly.
> I don't know. When I have had a problem before, I have ju
On 18/07/10 18:30, Matthew Glubb wrote:
Hi Alan,
Thanks very much for your reply.
Lets take this back to the list - not keep it between us - and I am
subscribed to the list so no need to copy me.
On 17 Jul 2010, at 20:08, Alan Chandler wrote:
You don't include the one piece of informati
Hello,
The four failures seem really high to me too. This might be a silly
question but: have you checked/replaced the controller and cables yet?
I had a machine with four disks and one of them picked randomly were
reported as bad every few weeks (all of them connected to the motherboard).
I rul
Matthew Glubb put forth on 7/17/2010 3:11 AM:
> Normally in the past when a disk has failed, I have dropped the offending
> disk from the array, replaced the disk, booted, rebuilt the filesystem on the
> new disk and re-synced the array. I've done this about four times with this
> method.
Once
On 17/07/10 09:11, Matthew Glubb wrote:
Hi All,
I have a problem replacing a failed disk with a LVM volume on a RAID1 array.
Normally in the past when a disk has failed, I have dropped the offending disk
from the array, replaced the disk, booted, rebuilt the filesystem on the new
disk and re-
5 matches
Mail list logo