robin wrote:
"Sid" is the testing kernel and is more advanced than
"Sarge" and will cause you problems; stay away from
that one.
I would disagree. For a production machine definitely but maybe not a
desktop machine. I have run unstable without any problems for 18
months. Maybe I've been lucky
On Monday 20 September 2004 19:02, robin wrote:
> >"Sid" is the testing kernel and is more advanced than
> >"Sarge" and will cause you problems; stay away from
> >that one.
>
> I would disagree. For a production machine definitely but maybe not a
> desktop machine. I have run unstable without any p
"Sid" is the testing kernel and is more advanced than
"Sarge" and will cause you problems; stay away from
that one.
I would disagree. For a production machine definitely but maybe not a
desktop machine. I have run unstable without any problems for 18 months.
Maybe I've been lucky but debian i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've decided to buy a PC with Debian Preinstalled. Should I go with
"Stable" Woody or "Development" Sarge?
Which PC?
Why not build a PC, buy the 14CD's and install Sarge?
Sarge, definitely. But why not wait until Sarge is stable? Then you
won't have to upgrade...
Hugo.
<#secure method=pgp mode=sign>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I've decided to buy a PC with Debian Preinstalled. Should I go with
> "Stable" Woody or "Development" Sarge?
I'd say you're safe with either right now. You'll probably want Sarge
because it
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've decided to buy a PC with Debian Preinstalled.
> Should I go with
> "Stable" Woody or "Development" Sarge?
>
I installed stable woody from purchased CD's (which is
what you will be buying) and have been able to upgrade
it to "Sarge" status by recompiling the
6 matches
Mail list logo
