Re: Perl upgrade risks

2005-07-01 Thread Antonio Lobato
Thank you for help.. Ill consider all it. But, cause this perl big trouble and some anothers circunstances, maybe I can upgrade to sarge at once. I know it will give much work, but it economizes more future work. Thank you! Tom Lobato -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [

Re: Perl upgrade risks

2005-06-29 Thread Almut Behrens
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 05:57:25PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > Almut Behrens wrote: > > (2) Install the new perl 5.8.7 in /usr/local and leave 5.6.1 as it is. > > This is probably the safest bet. In your software that needs >5.8.0, > > make sure you're calling the new version > > This doesn't

Re: Perl upgrade risks

2005-06-29 Thread Steve Lamb
Almut Behrens wrote: > (2) Install the new perl 5.8.7 in /usr/local and leave 5.6.1 as it is. > This is probably the safest bet. In your software that needs >5.8.0, > make sure you're calling the new version This doesn't work to well with packages since the packages in question could contain

Re: Perl upgrade risks

2005-06-29 Thread Almut Behrens
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 05:45:56PM -0300, Antonio Lobato wrote: > > I have a Debian Woody server running a lot of services such as > cyrus/postfix, apache, mysql-server, jabberd2, and more... Such as a > good woody system, my Perl is 5.6.1, and there are tons of scripts > that I made and