Re: Performance Issues with Spamassassin

2002-03-11 Thread Anthony and Mary Ann Tantillo
Actually, I just realized that if I comment out the exim line in inetd.conf the exim daemon will be started in /etx/init.d/exim. Tony On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 12:17:33AM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote: > on Fri, Mar 08, 2002, Anthony and Mary Ann Tantillo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > I have begun

Re: Performance Issues with Spamassassin

2002-03-11 Thread Anthony and Mary Ann Tantillo
Enabling the spamassassin daemon and checking mail for spam in daemon mode has made a huge difference. The exim change is interesting. This would involve changing the exim line in inet.d to /usr/sbin/exim exim -bd -q3min , changin the smtp_accept_queue_per_connection line to 50 in /etc/exim/ex

Re: Performance Issues with Spamassassin

2002-03-11 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Fri, Mar 08, 2002, Anthony and Mary Ann Tantillo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I have begun using spamassassin (2.01) with razor (1.19) as a mailfilter > in combination with fetchmail (5.9.8), procmail (3.2.2), and exim (3.3.4). > When I fetch a large number of messages (e.g. when I first start

Re: Performance Issues with Spamassassin

2002-03-09 Thread Anthony and Mary Ann Tantillo
That sounds good. I noticed that Debian sets up the spamd daemon to run as root. Is there any reason to run the daemon as a non-root user on a standalone system (assuming the firewall is set up correctly)? The README.spamd.gz file talks about this Tony On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 10:42:06PM -050

Re: Performance Issues with Spamassassin

2002-03-08 Thread Chris Hilts
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 10:33:21PM -0500, Anthony and Mary Ann Tantillo wrote: > I have begun using spamassassin (2.01) with razor (1.19) as a mailfilter > in combination with fetchmail (5.9.8), procmail (3.2.2), and exim (3.3.4). > When I fetch a large number of messages (e.g. when I first start