Re: Partitioning Scheme

2008-10-27 Thread ss11223
On Oct 25, 1:10 am, "Javier Vasquez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm about to install a new Debian system.  Previously what I've done > is to create 3 partitions (/, /boot, swap), but now that I have the > oporttunity, I'd like to do things differently.  I was reading the > Debian referenc

Re: Partitioning Scheme

2008-10-25 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, Here is my laptop partition, with sizes and the amount that is free. , | FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on | /dev/mapper/spark_vg-root_lv | 4.0G 554M 3.2G 15% / | /dev/mapper/spark_vg-home_lv |24G 7.4G 16G

Re: Partitioning Scheme for New 120GB Hard Drive -- Comments?

2004-02-23 Thread M . Kirchhoff
Karsten M. Self ix.netcom.com> writes: > > Updated at http://twiki.iwethey.org/Main/NixPartitioning > Thanks for updating your info. Partitioning tends to confuse recent Windows converts or those, like me, who started experimenting with Linux using a simple two-partition configuration (root an

Re: Partitioning Scheme for New 120GB Hard Drive -- Comments?

2004-02-14 Thread Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:54:05 +, Mark wrote: > Can you mix lvm and RAID? Yes. RAID-5 at least three SCSI disks, and partition the RAID with LVM2. > Does it make sense? Yes. > Would it be just too much complexity? Not quite. -- Leandro GuimarÃes Far

Re: Partitioning Scheme for New 120GB Hard Drive -- Comments?

2004-02-13 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 06:10:11PM -0500, Al Davis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Friday 13 February 2004 02:49 pm, Karsten M. Self wrote: > > You've also left off a recovery partition. ?I keep a 256 MiB - 512 > > MiB partition on which a relatively minimal installation is kept. > > I would go fa

Re: Partitioning Scheme for New 120GB Hard Drive -- Comments?

2004-02-13 Thread Benedict Verheyen
>M.Kirchhoff wrote: > I've been using GNU/Linux now for 18 months, and Debian for about 12. > Currently, my workstation hard drive is partitioned simply: > > /dev/hda1 => / > /dev/hda2 => swap > > I just purchased a new 120GB IDE drive, however, and would like to > partition it more effectively,

Re: Partitioning Scheme for New 120GB Hard Drive -- Comments?

2004-02-13 Thread Al Davis
On Friday 13 February 2004 02:49 pm, Karsten M. Self wrote: > You've also left off a recovery partition.  I keep a 256 MiB - 512 > MiB partition on which a relatively minimal installation is kept. I would go farther than that. My preferred setup is to have enough space to completely install twi

Re: Partitioning Scheme for New 120GB Hard Drive -- Comments?

2004-02-13 Thread Brendan Strejcek
Mark wrote: > Can you mix lvm and RAID? > Does it make sense? > Would it be just too much complexity? At my place of employ, we have someone working on building a linux box with the functionality of a netapp. The underlying device is a software raid 5 array of several disks which is presented t

Re: Partitioning Scheme for New 120GB Hard Drive -- Comments?

2004-02-13 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 05:54:17PM +0100, Andreas Janssen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hello > > M.Kirchhoff (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: > > > I've been using GNU/Linux now for 18 months, and Debian for about 12. > > Currently, my workstation hard drive is partitioned simply: > > > > /dev/hda1

Re: Partitioning Scheme for New 120GB Hard Drive -- Comments?

2004-02-13 Thread Mark
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 01:24:33PM -0500, Paul Morgan wrote: > Consider using LVM, for all your Linux filesystems except the root > filesystem. Then you can adjust the size if you guess wrongly. > > I am running 2x40GB and 4x80GB drives. The 80GBs are split into 4G > physical partitions, which g

Re: Partitioning Scheme for New 120GB Hard Drive -- Comments?

2004-02-13 Thread Paul Morgan
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:23:42 +, M.Kirchhoff wrote: > I've been using GNU/Linux now for 18 months, and Debian for about 12. Currently, > my workstation hard drive is partitioned simply: > > /dev/hda1 => / > /dev/hda2 => swap > > I just purchased a new 120GB IDE drive, however, and would like

Re: Partitioning Scheme for New 120GB Hard Drive -- Comments?

2004-02-13 Thread Kent West
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 03:23:42PM +, M.Kirchhoff wrote: > Here's my proposed scheme, based on Karsten's guide--out-of-date, but useful > nonetheless: http://kmself.home.netcom.com/Linux/FAQs/partition.html > > 20GB => WinXP (unless by some stroke of fortuity Half-Life2 is ported to Linux) >

Re: Partitioning Scheme for New 120GB Hard Drive -- Comments?

2004-02-13 Thread Andreas Janssen
Hello M.Kirchhoff (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: > I've been using GNU/Linux now for 18 months, and Debian for about 12. > Currently, my workstation hard drive is partitioned simply: > > /dev/hda1 => / > /dev/hda2 => swap > > I just purchased a new 120GB IDE drive, however, and would like to > pa

Re: Partitioning Scheme for New 120GB Hard Drive -- Comments?

2004-02-13 Thread Brian
Hi, (3) If you don't mind spending a few rainy afternoons, you might want to investigate lvm. It allows you to create virtual resizable partitions, so the only thing you have to decide at install time is size-of-slash and size-of-everything-else. It also allows you to do filesystem

Re: Partitioning Scheme for New 120GB Hard Drive -- Comments?

2004-02-13 Thread Brendan Strejcek
M. Kirchhoff wrote: > I just purchased a new 120GB IDE drive, however, and would like to > partition it more effectively > > 20GB => WinXP (unless by some stroke of fortuity Half-Life2 is ported > to Linux) > 150MB => / > 100MB => /boot > 1GB => /tmp > 1GB => swap > 1GB => /var > 20GB => /u