Am 2008-01-30 22:40:27, schrieb mouss:
> so we can no more discuss Puppy Linux or the Puppy package manager on
> debian lists?
>
> keyword filtering on general public lists is risky. I wonder if training
> bayes with a large corpus would help (the problem is what spam to use in
> the corpus).
Am 2008-02-01 06:32:34, schrieb Ron Johnson:
> On 01/30/08 17:17, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > I would filter for UPPER case only subjects since to 99.99% they are spam.
>
> OR AOL USERS.
N.C. :-)
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Networ
El sáb, 02-02-2008 a las 11:10 +1300, Chris Bannister escribió:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:42:22PM -0500, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> > On Tue January 29 2008, Nigel Henry wrote:
> > > First of all, let me say a big thank you, as it proves that my spamfilter
> > > is not yet filtering out spam from
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:42:22PM -0500, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On Tue January 29 2008, Nigel Henry wrote:
> > First of all, let me say a big thank you, as it proves that my spamfilter
> > is not yet filtering out spam from the Debian mailing list.
>
> I'd be interested in a filter that would w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/30/08 17:17, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2008-01-30 08:46:51, schrieb Paul Cartwright:
>> On Wed January 30 2008, David Baron wrote:
>>> OK spamassassin folks: Rules which would say no puppies on software mailing
>>> lists, no software on dog-br
On Wed January 30 2008, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> I would filter for UPPER case only subjects since to 99.99% they are spam.
that sounds something like:
select SUBJECT, matches regular expression, THEN_WHAT..
I don't do regular expressions..
--
Paul Cartwright
Registered Linux user # 367800
Regi
Am 2008-01-29 18:34:57, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> Hello,
> I am kathy barry by the by the name,i have two puppies of whose breed
> are tcup yorkies and english bull dog for sale.The puppies comes with
> akc,ckc papers,1 yr health gurantee and they got thier 1st shot.
Can I use them as watchd
Am 2008-01-30 08:46:51, schrieb Paul Cartwright:
> On Wed January 30 2008, David Baron wrote:
> > OK spamassassin folks: Rules which would say no puppies on software mailing
> > lists, no software on dog-breeders mailing lists. A few false alarms, i.e.
> > "that great new app is such a sweet-puppie
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 01:29:32PM -0500, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> I'm not sure that original post was as much
> spam as inappropriate or a troll..
I agree. It was mostly just inappropriate. And it lacked a lot of the
key signs of spam so even a well trained spam filter would likely have
missed i
On Wed January 30 2008, mouss wrote:
> so we can no more discuss Puppy Linux or the Puppy package manager on
> debian lists?
yes!
>
> keyword filtering on general public lists is risky. I wonder if training
> bayes with a large corpus would help (the problem is what spam to use in
> the corpus).
I
John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 08:38 +0200, David Baron wrote:
OK spamassassin folks: Rules which would say no puppies on software mailing
lists, no software on dog-breeders mailing lists. A few false alarms, i.e.
"that great new app is such a sweet-puppie" and that "breeder's man
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 08:38 +0200, David Baron wrote:
> OK spamassassin folks: Rules which would say no puppies on software mailing
> lists, no software on dog-breeders mailing lists. A few false alarms, i.e.
> "that great new app is such a sweet-puppie" and that "breeder's management
> package
On Wed January 30 2008, David Baron wrote:
> OK spamassassin folks: Rules which would say no puppies on software mailing
> lists, no software on dog-breeders mailing lists. A few false alarms, i.e.
> "that great new app is such a sweet-puppie" and that "breeder's management
> package is a killer ap
On Wednesday 30 January 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > First of all, let me say a big thank you, as it proves that my spamfilter
> > is not yet filtering out spam from the Debian mailing list.
>
> I'd be interested in a filter that would work on a message like that.. Not
> sure what the differ
Paul Cartwright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue January 29 2008, Nigel Henry wrote:
> > First of all, let me say a big thank you, as it proves that my spamfilter
> > is not yet filtering out spam from the Debian mailing list.
>
> I'd be interested in a filter that would work on a message like that
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:50:11 +0100, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> I'd be interested in a filter that would work on a message like that.. Not
> sure what the difference is between a message about puppies and a message
> about ndiswrapper.. Not sure if ndiswrapper is in the dictionary, but puppies
> is
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 06:34:57PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: PUPPIES FOR SALE
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is a very nice puppy (free):
http://www.puppylinux.org/user/viewpage.php?page_id=1
best regards.
--
Gérard
On Tue January 29 2008, Nigel Henry wrote:
> First of all, let me say a big thank you, as it proves that my spamfilter
> is not yet filtering out spam from the Debian mailing list.
I'd be interested in a filter that would work on a message like that.. Not
sure what the difference is between a mes
On Tuesday 29 January 2008 18:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
> I am kathy barry by the by the name,i have two puppies of whose breed are
> tcup yorkies and english bull dog for sale.The puppies comes with akc,ckc
> papers,1 yr health gurantee and they got thier 1st shot.
>
> I am giving this
19 matches
Mail list logo
