> > And... BTW: how do I know for certain that you aren't one of Putin's
> > trolls? Exactly.
>
You have found us out.
Good morning from Saint Pyotrsbourg.
Hi.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:04:21AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 09:24:55PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > On Sun 14 Oct 2018 at 16:06:44 -0400, Default User wrote:
> >
> > > > "
> > > > > Moreover I hope we can leave the bickering behind
> > > > > us and realize t
On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 09:24:55PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 14 Oct 2018 at 16:06:44 -0400, Default User wrote:
>
> > > "
> > > > Moreover I hope we can leave the bickering behind
> > > > us and realize that after all, we're all working on free software,
> > > > may our approaches differ someti
On Sun 14 Oct 2018 at 16:06:44 -0400, Default User wrote:
> > "
> > > Moreover I hope we can leave the bickering behind
> > > us and realize that after all, we're all working on free software,
> > > may our approaches differ sometimes.
> >
> > Agreed. Sheer commonsense. And more fun, too.
> >
> "
> "
> > Moreover I hope we can leave the bickering behind
> > us and realize that after all, we're all working on free software,
> > may our approaches differ sometimes.
>
> Agreed. Sheer commonsense. And more fun, too.
>
"
With all due respect, I must strongly disagree.
Systemd is Redhat/NSA ca
On Sun 14 Oct 2018 at 17:57:47 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 10:23:15AM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> >
> > Throughout Jessie and Stretch, I have been running Debian without
> > systemd as the init system. If systemd became installed by accident, I
> > promptly removed it
Tried to forward the message, but the mail address has permanent errors...
Ron
On Fri, 16 Jun 2000, S.P. van Noort wrote:
> Install Nano, it's interface is exactly like Pico, especially the latest
> version in woody. It is GPL, so it is in main.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Sander
>
> P.S. I've lost t
Install Nano, it's interface is exactly like Pico, especially the latest
version in woody. It is GPL, so it is in main.
Greetings,
Sander
P.S. I've lost the address of Thiago, so could someone (Ron ?) please send this
message directly to him ?
On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 04:49:55PM +0200, Ron
It'n in pine, pine is in non-free, you'll have to install the pine sources
and the diffs, then build a binary debian package that you can install.
Ron Rademaker
On Fri, 16 Jun 2000, Thiago wrote:
> Wich package at deselect have the PICO TEXT EDITOR? i would like to use
> them.
>
> Thanks!!
>
>
Thanks a lot for the info.
Chip
Bruce Sass wrote:
>
> You can get pine/pico/pilot binary .debs (3.96 and 4.10) from:
>
> http://www.ompages.com/debian/pkgs/pine/pine.html
>
> [Thanks to Santiago for making the source packages,
> and to Paul for compiling and making them available.]
>
>
You can get pine/pico/pilot binary .debs (3.96 and 4.10) from:
http://www.ompages.com/debian/pkgs/pine/pine.html
[Thanks to Santiago for making the source packages,
and to Paul for compiling and making them available.]
- Bruce
--
On Thu, 6 May 1999, Fu-Dong Chiou wrote:
> Hi all,
>
On Thu, 6 May 1999, John Galt wrote:
[ snip ]
: binary and avoid the moronic situation altogether (rather curious that
: Debian is the only distro with legal probs in this area, no?)
It's not at all curious if you bother reading the list archives.
Reading the DFSG might now be a bad idea eithe
Because pico is a separate subprogram in Pine, an email program that
Debian doesn't support in binary form because of licensing considerations.
Pine is available in non-free as a source package, along with pilot and
pico in the same package, so you'll have to download the -diffs, -src,
and .dsc fi
On Thu, May 06, 1999 at 03:17:44AM -0400, Fu-Dong Chiou wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone can tell me why I cannot find a simple editor
> pico on my Debian 2.1r2 packages. Thanks a lot!
The pico copyright is the same as the one for pine and forbids distribution
of modified binaries. Modification
14 matches
Mail list logo
