On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:07:04PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 03:21:53PM +0100, mess-mate wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 07:07:30 -0500
> > Seneca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > | In ~/.gnupg/gnupg.conf, uncomment or add
> > | "keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve".
> >
>
on Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:51:39PM +, debian parisc ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Friends,
>
> forgive me for my ignorance, but I see a lot of emails on this list with
> PGP signatures. Exactly what purpose does it serve having PGP as part of
> your signature? They just look like a string of
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:51:39PM +, debian parisc wrote:
>> Friends,
>>
>> forgive me for my ignorance, but I see a lot of emails on this list with
>> PGP signatures. Exactly what purpose does it serve having PGP as part of
>> your signature? The
Thanks to all for your help.
Indeed, options or a conf are both valuable after
a test.
mess-mate
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 16:10:24 -0500
"Robert L. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
|
| Move the file from .gnupg/options to .gnupg/gpg.conf, they changed the
| location of the file a bit back.
|
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:28:31AM -0500, Robert L. Harris wrote:
> Make one.
No, the preferred file this is in is .gnupg/options. Having two
different options files *will* be a pain in the ass.
--
.''`. Baloo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian admin and user
`. `'`
`- Debia
Move the file from .gnupg/options to .gnupg/gpg.conf, they changed the
location of the file a bit back.
May want to try different keyservers (comment out the gatech, etc.
Thus spake mess-mate ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 10:28:31 -0500
> "Robert L. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 10:28:31 -0500
"Robert L. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
|
| Make one.
|
| Here's mine:
| # So we can work with pgp keys
| force-v3-sigs
| # To deal with mailer and >From lines
| escape-from-lines
| # we only need to do this once while the gpg process is usin
This one time, at band camp, mess-mate said:
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 07:07:30 -0500
> Seneca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | In ~/.gnupg/gnupg.conf, uncomment or add
> | "keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve".
> |
> ?? there is no gnupg.conf !! Did I missing somewhat ?
> here are the files I have
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 03:21:53PM +0100, mess-mate wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 07:07:30 -0500
> Seneca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | In ~/.gnupg/gnupg.conf, uncomment or add
> | "keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve".
>
> ?? there is no gnupg.conf !! Did I missing somewhat ?
For ~/.gnupg/gn
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 11:39:57AM +0100, mess-mate wrote:
> Uhh, good idea, how can I do that ??
Go look at the comments in your .gnupg/options
--
.''`. Baloo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian admin and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than to fix a sy
Make one.
Here's mine:
# So we can work with pgp keys
force-v3-sigs
# To deal with mailer and >From lines
escape-from-lines
# we only need to do this once while the gpg process is using the ring
lock-once
# Our options
keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve include-disabled include-
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 07:07:30 -0500
Seneca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 11:39:57AM +0100, mess-mate wrote:
| > On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 17:26:26 -0800
| > Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| >
| > | On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 08:50:06PM +0100, mess-mate wrote:
| > | > But the
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 11:39:57AM +0100, mess-mate wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 17:26:26 -0800
> Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> | On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 08:50:06PM +0100, mess-mate wrote:
> | > But the senders public key must be retrieved from a key-server and added
> | > to your o
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 17:26:26 -0800
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 08:50:06PM +0100, mess-mate wrote:
| > But the senders public key must be retrieved from a key-server and added
| > to your own key-list before an automated check is possible.
| > mess-mate
|
| U
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 08:50:06PM +0100, mess-mate wrote:
> But the senders public key must be retrieved from a key-server and added
> to your own key-list before an automated check is possible.
> mess-mate
Unless you've set your gnupg to automagically grab public keys from
the keyserver for you
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 11:06:27 -0500
Seneca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:51:39PM +, debian parisc wrote:
| > forgive me for my ignorance, but I see a lot of emails on this list with
| > PGP signatures. Exactly what purpose does it serve having PGP as part of
| > your
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 11:06:27 -0500
Seneca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:51:39PM +, debian parisc wrote:
| > forgive me for my ignorance, but I see a lot of emails on this list with
| > PGP signatures. Exactly what purpose does it serve having PGP as part of
| > your
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:51:39PM +, debian parisc wrote:
> forgive me for my ignorance, but I see a lot of emails on this list with
> PGP signatures. Exactly what purpose does it serve having PGP as part of
> your signature? They just look like a string of characters that could have
> been
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:51:39PM +, debian parisc wrote:
> Friends,
>
> forgive me for my ignorance, but I see a lot of emails on this list with
> PGP signatures. Exactly what purpose does it serve having PGP as part of
> your signature? They just look like a string of characters that coul
On Monday 27 Jan 2003 2:51 pm, debian parisc wrote:
> It maybe because I receive most of the emails from this list in windows95
> (I'm at work), that they have no significance.
If you are using pgp you can verify the authenticity of the message - i.e. it
comes from who the 'from' line says, rathe
20 matches
Mail list logo
