On Fri 26 Jan 2018 at 10:14:22 (+0100), Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 20:31:36 -0600
> David Wright wrote:
>
> > But the main difference between the old and new versions (upgraded
> > today) is that the new version spews error messages from the
> > configuration files, 152 o
ks
> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 20:44:46 -0600
> From: Greg Marks
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: PDF displayed incorrectly by certain software
>
> Thanks for the replies. The most recent upgraded versions of Poppler
> in Debian 9 (libpoppler64:amd64 0.48.0-2
Hi,
On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 20:44:46 -0600
Greg Marks wrote:
> Thanks for the replies. The most recent upgraded versions of Poppler
> in Debian 9 (libpoppler64:amd64 0.48.0-2+deb9u2, libpoppler-glib8:amd64
> 0.48.0-2+deb9u2, poppler-utils 0.48.0-2+deb9u2, libpoppler-qt4-4:amd64
> 0.48.0-2+deb9u2, l
Hi,
On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 20:31:36 -0600
David Wright wrote:
> But the main difference between the old and new versions (upgraded
> today) is that the new version spews error messages from the
> configuration files, 152 of them in all.
>
> Here are the first few. (The program stammers.)
>
> Conf
: PDF displayed incorrectly by certain software
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 14:21:59 +0100
> Ionel Mugurel Ciobîcă wrote:
>
> > Downgraded some poppler packages and I can view now all pdf files
> > with xpdf. The difference between the old and new files now (for
On Thu 25 Jan 2018 at 22:05:27 (+0100), Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 14:21:59 +0100
> Ionel Mugurel Ciobîcă wrote:
>
> > Downgraded some poppler packages and I can view now all pdf files
> > with xpdf. The difference between the old and new files now (for me)
> > is that th
Hi,
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 14:21:59 +0100
Ionel Mugurel Ciobîcă wrote:
> Downgraded some poppler packages and I can view now all pdf files
> with xpdf. The difference between the old and new files now (for me)
> is that they use (visible) different fonts.
Just for the record, today's upgrade to st
On 23-01-2018, at 10h 11'43", Curt wrote about "Re: PDF displayed incorrectly
by certain software"
>
> Same problem here with bank statements (recent bank statements unviewable in
> xpdf but viewable in evince).
>
> (Actually it appears the pdfs viewable in
On 23-01-2018, at 11h 18'26", Michael Lange wrote about "Re: PDF displayed
incorrectly by certain software"
> Hi again,
>
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:03:24 +0100
> Michael Lange wrote:
>
> uh no, appears to be rather this bug in libpoppler:
>
> https
Hi again,
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:03:24 +0100
Michael Lange wrote:
> just a shot in the dark: I think okular and qpdfview use qt, some of the
> "working" viewers seem to use gtk. Not sure about the toolkit xpdf and
> some of the other programs use, but maybe the problem has something to
> do with
On 2018-01-23, Ionel Mugurel Ciobîcă wrote:
> On 22-01-2018, at 18h 28'13", Greg Marks wrote about "PDF displayed
> incorrectly by certain software"
>> I have encountered a peculiar situation where a PDF file displays as
>> gibberish with certain PDF viewers but displays correctly with others.
>>
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 18:28:13 -0600
Greg Marks wrote:
> I have encountered a peculiar situation where a PDF file displays as
> gibberish with certain PDF viewers but displays correctly with others.
> The PDF file in question can be downloaded from the site:
>
>https://link.springer.com/a
ebian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: PDF displayed incorrectly by certain software
Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 01:15:16 + (UTC)
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On 22-01-2018, at 18h 28'13", Greg Marks wrote about "PDF displayed incorrectly by
certain software"
I have en
On 23-01-2018, at 13h 55'49", Richard Hector wrote about "Re: PDF displayed
incorrectly by certain software"
> 3) the stderr out from (at least) okular and xpdf look like they might
> be useful to someone who understands the topic better, but do look like
> something
On 22-01-2018, at 18h 28'13", Greg Marks wrote about "PDF displayed incorrectly
by certain software"
> I have encountered a peculiar situation where a PDF file displays as
> gibberish with certain PDF viewers but displays correctly with others.
> [...]
> numerous "Missing or bad Type3 CharProc ent
On 23/01/18 13:28, Greg Marks wrote:
> I have encountered a peculiar situation where a PDF file displays as
> gibberish with certain PDF viewers but displays correctly with others.
> The PDF file in question can be downloaded from the site:
>
>https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11856-0
16 matches
Mail list logo
