On 06/24/2024 12:29 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
Karen Lewellen (12024-06-24):
Good afternoon.
I am providing another option that might help here.
robobraille,
www.robobraille.org
Provides services, free of charge, that will convert pdf files to a number
of different formats, including .html
They
On 06/24/2024 12:22 PM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Good afternoon.
I am providing another option that might help here.
robobraille,
www.robobraille.org
Provides services, free of charge, that will convert pdf files to a
number of different formats, including .html
They provide audio, mobi, and co
On 2024-08-07 09:27, Arbol One wrote:
Anyone knows about a PDF editor for Debian?
do you mean CLI or windows tool for PDF editor?
--
corey hickman
On Tue 06 Aug 2024 at 21:27:00 (-0400), Arbol One wrote:
> Anyone knows about a PDF editor for Debian?
Perhaps you could summarise what you learnt, and what you feel you
didn't learn, from the thread that you opened here six weeks ago.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2024/06/msg00667.html
qpdf is good for e.g. removing any password protection - given you know the
password. But I kinda doubt that's what's meant with editor. And quite
frankly, you can do most of what qpdf does more comfortably with tools like
PDFSam or PDF Arranger. The latter even lets you crop pages or rename the
do
On 24/06/24 at 00:50, Arbol One wrote:
Hello.
Is there a PDF editor that would work with Debian 12?
Time ago I used Qpdf to delete some pages in a .pdf, for a quick
description:
~$ apt show qpdf
in the manual there are some command examples, I used these command to
edit a pdf:
- To dele
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 08:01:26PM +0200, Detlef Vollmann wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 04:26:47 -0400
> Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
>
> > I use Master PDF Editor. It works great.
> > https://code-industry.net/free-pdf-editor/
>
> It looks nice.
> But being a closed source SW from Russia I'd be
On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 04:26:47 -0400
Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> I use Master PDF Editor. It works great.
> https://code-industry.net/free-pdf-editor/
It looks nice.
But being a closed source SW from Russia I'd be careful to run
it outside of an isolated VM (which is actually true for most
clos
I wouldn't say PDFs are bad for visually impaired users. In fact, as bitmap
fonts are thankfully a thing of the past for almost everywhere, you can
zoom any document to your hearts desire. Though sometimes you need some
tricks, e.g. Evince is configured to only use 50 MB of storage by default
for c
Karen Lewellen (12024-06-24):
> Good afternoon.
> I am providing another option that might help here.
> robobraille,
>
> www.robobraille.org
> Provides services, free of charge, that will convert pdf files to a number
> of different formats, including .html
> They provide audio, mobi, and conver
Good afternoon.
I am providing another option that might help here.
robobraille,
www.robobraille.org
Provides services, free of charge, that will convert pdf files to a
number of different formats, including .html
They provide audio, mobi, and convert epub files too..but I digress.
As a test,
On 06/24/2024 12:35 AM, Richard wrote:
Hello,
this very much depends on what you are expecting it to do. In general, PDFs
are only meant to be viewed - and printed - they where never meant for
anything else. ...
Second sentence should read:
... only meant to be viewed by those with *NORMAL* vi
On 24/6/24 13:35, Richard wrote:
So your best bet is just to try to never have to edit a PDF at all.
Always try to get a hand on the original file the PDF was delivered
from. Even if it's a docx
In my view, pdf and docx shoud be regarded as publication formats for
content managed in a pro
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 2:23 AM Arbol One wrote:
> Hello.
> Is there a PDF editor that would work with Debian 12?
>
I use Master PDF Editor. It works great.
https://code-industry.net/free-pdf-editor/
Thanks.
> --
> *ArbolOne.ca* Using Fire Fox and Thunderbird. ArbolOne is composed of
> students
Arbol One wrote:
> Is there a PDF editor that would work with Debian 12?
It's depending on what you understand under "edit", and whether you expect to
use Free Open Source Software (FOSS) or not.
If you just want to fill out forms (JavaScript), then I'd recommend the FOSS
programs: chromium bro
Hello,
this very much depends on what you are expecting it to do. In general, PDFs
are only meant to be viewed - and printed - they where never meant for
anything else. Even filling out forms is just s bad hackjob through
JavaScript. That being said, there is software with PDF editing
capabilities
Dan Ritter writes:
> Apart from Windows-derived GDI printers, the majority of laser
> and inkjet printers have a PostScript interpreter built in, even
> if its primary use is in interpreting PDF files.
I think that's probably outdated info too. My cheapie Epson XP-3100
supports some bitmap forma
On 13/3/23 08:13, Brian wrote:
The processing chain in cups generated a raster bitmap image for me to
format and deliver to the printer. I didn't dig deep but I suspect the
previous stages involved postscript before raster conversion rather than
directly from a pdf stage.
Suspicions don't qu
On Mon 13 Mar 2023 at 04:25:12 +0800, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
>
> On 13/3/23 03:38, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >
> > Nowadays PDF is what matters: it's the standard format for driverless
> > printing (along with a mix of JPEG, PWG raster, or PCLm depending on
> > which driverless printing standard you
On 13/3/23 03:38, Stefan Monnier wrote:
Nowadays PDF is what matters: it's the standard format for driverless
printing (along with a mix of JPEG, PWG raster, or PCLm depending on
which driverless printing standard you're talking about). Admittedly,
standards like IPP Everywhere require suppor
>> However, the cost of implementation was high; computers output raw
>> PS code that would be interpreted by the printer into a raster image
>> at the printer's natural resolution. This required high performance
>> microprocessors and ample memory. The LaserWriter used a 12 MHz
>> Motorola 68
On Sun 12 Mar 2023 at 16:52:37 -, Curt wrote:
> On 2023-03-12, Dan Ritter wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Many (most?) printers do not understand PostScript. The
> >> > printing system itself is based on processing PDFs.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Oh.
> >> Times have changed!
> >> I thought it was the other wa
On Sun 12 Mar 2023 at 11:50:15 -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Yassine Chaouche wrote:
> > Le 3/12/23 à 14:18, Brian a écrit :
> > > On Sun 12 Mar 2023 at 10:45:02 +0100, Yassine Chaouche wrote:
> > >
> > > > Le 3/9/23 à 15:33, Vincent Lefevre a écrit :
> > > > > it is strange that the choice was to
Curt wrote:
> On 2023-03-12, Dan Ritter wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Many (most?) printers do not understand PostScript. The
> >> > printing system itself is based on processing PDFs.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Oh.
> >> Times have changed!
> >> I thought it was the other way around.
> >
> > You are correct, Yas
On 2023-03-12, Dan Ritter wrote:
>> >
>> > Many (most?) printers do not understand PostScript. The
>> > printing system itself is based on processing PDFs.
>> >
>>
>> Oh.
>> Times have changed!
>> I thought it was the other way around.
>
> You are correct, Yassine.
>
> PostScript is an interpre
Yassine Chaouche wrote:
> Le 3/12/23 à 14:18, Brian a écrit :
> > On Sun 12 Mar 2023 at 10:45:02 +0100, Yassine Chaouche wrote:
> >
> > > Le 3/9/23 à 15:33, Vincent Lefevre a écrit :
> > > > it is strange that the choice was to generate
> > > > PostScript and not PDF.
> > >
> > > Isn't postscrip
Le 3/12/23 à 14:18, Brian a écrit :
On Sun 12 Mar 2023 at 10:45:02 +0100, Yassine Chaouche wrote:
Le 3/9/23 à 15:33, Vincent Lefevre a écrit :
it is strange that the choice was to generate
PostScript and not PDF.
Isn't postscript what printers read?
Many (most?) printers do not understand
Le 3/9/23 à 15:33, Vincent Lefevre a écrit :
it is strange that the choice was to generate
PostScript and not PDF.
Isn't postscript what printers read?
Best,
--
yassine -- sysadm
+213-779 06 06 23
http://about.me/ychaouche
Looking for side gigs.
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 10:21:55PM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 09/03/2023 21:29, tomas wrote:
> > TeX is perfectly fine as a PDF backend. Especially if you go for the
> > more "modern" variants, like LuaTeX, which grok UTF-8 natively.
>
> I am curious if you can provide preamble with font confi
On 09/03/2023 21:29, tomas wrote:
TeX is perfectly fine as a PDF backend. Especially if you go for the
more "modern" variants, like LuaTeX, which grok UTF-8 natively.
I am curious if you can provide preamble with font configuration working
for most of users for documents including non-latin sc
On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 10:42 PM Charles Curley
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 08:50:08 +0800
> Corey Hickman wrote:
>
> > If I want to convert some excel files to PDF, what's the suggested
> > way? I know I can program with java to implement that, but if there
> > are existing command-line soluti
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 08:50:08 +0800
Corey Hickman wrote:
> If I want to convert some excel files to PDF, what's the suggested
> way? I know I can program with java to implement that, but if there
> are existing command-line solutions I would like to try them.
This really should have been a new em
On 2023-03-10 08:50:08 +0800, Corey Hickman wrote:
> If I want to convert some excel files to PDF, what's the suggested way? I
> know I can program with java to implement that, but if there are existing
> command-line solutions I would like to try them.
I've just tried on some Excel file: unoconv
On 2023-03-09 17:58:37 +, Brian wrote:
> That would be a big drawback for a printing filter.
>
> CHARSET=utf-8 /usr/lib/cups/filter/texttopdf 1 1 1 1 1 UTF-8-demo.txt
> >out.pdf
The only good thing is that box drawing is fine (while the other
converters don't work well for that). However, t
On 2023-03-09 19:24:20 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> If everything else fails, read the instructions [1].
>
> --pdf-engine=PROGRAM
>
> Use the specified engine when producing PDF output. Valid values
> are pdflatex, lualatex, xelatex, latexmk, tectonic, wkhtmltopdf,
> weasyprint, p
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 2:15 AM Linux-Fan wrote:
> Corey Hickman writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > What's the suggested PDF generator in Debian (without desktop)?
> > And is there a VIM plugin for that?
>
> For cases where I care little about font or formatting, I use VIM's
> integrated hardcopy:
>
>
On Thu 09 Mar 2023 at 18:36:26 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2023-03-09 18:07:24 +0100, didier gaumet wrote:
> > Le 09/03/2023 à 16:11, Vincent Lefevre a écrit :
> >
> > >libreoffice --headless --convert-to pdf file.txt
> > >
> > > produces a PDF of better quality (fewer spacing issues)
On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 05:47:02PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2023-03-09 17:38:54 +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> > Vincent Lefevre (12023-03-09):
> > > produces a PDF of better quality (fewer spacing issues).
> >
> > If you want a PDF of better quality, use a workflow that includes TeX.
>
Corey Hickman writes:
Hello,
What's the suggested PDF generator in Debian (without desktop)?
And is there a VIM plugin for that?
For cases where I care little about font or formatting, I use VIM's
integrated hardcopy:
:ha > /tmp/print.ps
:!ps2pdf /tmp/print.ps /tmp/print.p
On Thu 09 Mar 2023 at 17:35:41 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2023-03-09 15:13:21 +, Brian wrote:
> > On Thu 09 Mar 2023 at 15:01:00 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> >
> > > On 2023-03-09 13:42:22 +, Brian wrote:
> > > > For a searchable PDF, I would use
> > > >
> > > > :execute '!/
On 2023-03-09 18:07:24 +0100, didier gaumet wrote:
> Le 09/03/2023 à 16:11, Vincent Lefevre a écrit :
>
> >libreoffice --headless --convert-to pdf file.txt
> >
> > produces a PDF of better quality (fewer spacing issues).
> [...]
>
> Hello,
>
> I do not use it myself so I don't know it well
* On 2023 09 Mar 04:41 -0600, Corey Hickman wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What's the suggested PDF generator in Debian (without desktop)?
> And is there a VIM plugin for that?
If you really want to be "old school" there is roff handled by Groff in
Debian (most man pages are written in roff using the "man"
Le 09/03/2023 à 16:11, Vincent Lefevre a écrit :
libreoffice --headless --convert-to pdf file.txt
produces a PDF of better quality (fewer spacing issues).
[...]
Hello,
I do not use it myself so I don't know it well but unoconv seems to be a
headless Libreoffice converter with the ability
On 2023-03-09 17:38:54 +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> Vincent Lefevre (12023-03-09):
> > produces a PDF of better quality (fewer spacing issues).
>
> If you want a PDF of better quality, use a workflow that includes TeX.
Not really. This can be better, but this can also be much worse,
in particul
Vincent Lefevre (12023-03-09):
> produces a PDF of better quality (fewer spacing issues).
If you want a PDF of better quality, use a workflow that includes TeX.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 2023-03-09 15:13:21 +, Brian wrote:
> On Thu 09 Mar 2023 at 15:01:00 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
> > On 2023-03-09 13:42:22 +, Brian wrote:
> > > For a searchable PDF, I would use
> > >
> > > :execute '!/usr/lib/cups/filter/texttopdf 1 1 1 1 1 % > out.pdf'
> > >
> > > cups-filte
Le 9 mars 2023 Corey Hickman a écrit :
> I always compose documents in debian via VIM. so if there is a PDF plugin
> for VIM that would be great.
There is a VimTeX plugin. You compose a LaTeX file and compile PDF with
pdflatex/lualatex.
https://github.com/lervag/vimtex
On 09/03/2023 22:11, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
libreoffice --headless --convert-to pdf file.txt
produces a PDF of better quality (fewer spacing issues).
I was assuming something like markdown/reStructuredText/asciidoc/etc.
instead of plain text. As the last resort
:TOhtml
vim command t
On Thu 09 Mar 2023 at 15:29:51 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 01:42:22PM +, Brian wrote:
> > On Thu 09 Mar 2023 at 12:43:51 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > There are other (simpler) options, look for text2pdf/text2ps. Personally,
> > > I go the (La)
On Thu 09 Mar 2023 at 15:11:05 +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> Vincent Lefevre (12023-03-09):
> > But it generates a letter page size instead of using /etc/papersize.
>
> And apparently that is not its only flaw, a quick test had it just skip
> non-ascii characters.
A possible solution:
:execu
On Thu 09 Mar 2023 at 15:01:00 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2023-03-09 13:42:22 +, Brian wrote:
> > For a searchable PDF, I would use
> >
> > :execute '!/usr/lib/cups/filter/texttopdf 1 1 1 1 1 % > out.pdf'
> >
> > cups-filters needs to be on the system.
>
> But it generates a lette
On 2023-03-09 15:55:13 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2023-03-09 21:42:24 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
> > If you use some markup language that can be converted to HTML then
> > there is an alternative to LaTeX workflow:
> >
> > chromium --headless --disable-gpu --print-to-pdf=/tmp/test.pdf
> > f
On 2023-03-09 21:42:24 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 09/03/2023 17:32, Corey Hickman wrote:
> >
> > What's the suggested PDF generator in Debian (without desktop)?
> > And is there a VIM plugin for that?
>
> If you use some markup language that can be converted to HTML then there is
> an alterna
On 2023-03-09 15:29:51 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> TeX is perfectly fine as a PDF backend. Especially if you go for the
> more "modern" variants, like LuaTeX, which grok UTF-8 natively.
Yes, but has anyone written a nice wrapper that fully supports Unicode
(selecting the right fonts...)?
I k
On 09/03/2023 17:32, Corey Hickman wrote:
What's the suggested PDF generator in Debian (without desktop)?
And is there a VIM plugin for that?
If you use some markup language that can be converted to HTML then there
is an alternative to LaTeX workflow:
chromium --headless --disable-gpu --pri
Vincent Lefevre (12023-03-09):
> Until now, I've been using a script that does
>
> paps $opt | ps2pdf - $@[-1]:t.pdf
>
> with some options. But due to the use of PostScript as an intermediate
> file, the PDF has no text part (it is not searchable, etc.).
It is not due to the use of PostScript,
On 2023-03-09 15:12:17 +0100, Yassine Chaouche wrote:
> Le 3/9/23 à 12:43, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
> > look for text2pdf/text2ps.
> It's strange that we have a2ps and ps2pdf but not a2pdf.
a2ps is old and does not support Unicode. AFAIK, paps is suggested
as a replacement, but it is strange tha
On 2023-03-09 15:11:05 +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> Vincent Lefevre (12023-03-09):
> > But it generates a letter page size instead of using /etc/papersize.
>
> And apparently that is not its only flaw, a quick test had it just skip
> non-ascii characters.
>
> I wish somebody would make a good c
On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 01:42:22PM +, Brian wrote:
> On Thu 09 Mar 2023 at 12:43:51 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> > There are other (simpler) options, look for text2pdf/text2ps. Personally,
> > I go the (La)TeX way.
>
> For a searchable PDF, I would use
What do you mean by "searcha
Yassine Chaouche (12023-03-09):
> It's strange that we have a2ps and ps2pdf but not a2pdf.
a2ps dates back from when PDF was a crappy format where you either had
to use proprietary Acrobat Reader or Libre readers unable to show most
files properly.
I mean, its web page has the HTML tags in all ca
Le 3/9/23 à 12:43, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
look for text2pdf/text2ps.
It's strange that we have a2ps and ps2pdf but not a2pdf.
Best,
--
yassine -- sysadm
+213-779 06 06 23
http://about.me/ychaouche
Looking for side gigs.
Vincent Lefevre (12023-03-09):
> But it generates a letter page size instead of using /etc/papersize.
And apparently that is not its only flaw, a quick test had it just skip
non-ascii characters.
I wish somebody would make a good command-line front-end for Pango +
Cairo.
Regards,
--
Nicolas
On 2023-03-09 13:42:22 +, Brian wrote:
> For a searchable PDF, I would use
>
> :execute '!/usr/lib/cups/filter/texttopdf 1 1 1 1 1 % > out.pdf'
>
> cups-filters needs to be on the system.
But it generates a letter page size instead of using /etc/papersize.
--
Vincent Lefèvre - Web:
On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 19:03:23 +0800
Corey Hickman wrote:
> I always compose documents in debian via VIM. so if there is a PDF
> plugin for VIM that would be great.
Not a plugin for VIM, but if you run CUPS look into the debian package
printer-driver-cups-pdf.
--
Does anybody read signatures any
On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 12:10:39PM +0100, Erwan David wrote:
> Le 09/03/2023 à 12:03, Corey Hickman a écrit :
> > I always compose documents in debian via VIM. so if there is a PDF
> > plugin for VIM that would be great.
> >
> > Thanks
>
> Not a Vim plugin, but I usually compose documents in mark
Le 09/03/2023 à 12:03, Corey Hickman a écrit :
I always compose documents in debian via VIM. so if there is a PDF
plugin for VIM that would be great.
Thanks
Not a Vim plugin, but I usually compose documents in markdown in
aneditor (be it vim or emacs) then generate a pdf from the markdown wi
I always compose documents in debian via VIM. so if there is a PDF plugin
for VIM that would be great.
Thanks
On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 7:01 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Corey Hickman (12023-03-09):
> > What's the suggested PDF generator in Debian (without desktop)?
>
> There are many things capable
Corey Hickman (12023-03-09):
> What's the suggested PDF generator in Debian (without desktop)?
There are many things capable of generating PDF in Debian. What do you
want to generate your PDF *from*?
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
On Fri 26 Jan 2018 at 10:14:22 (+0100), Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 20:31:36 -0600
> David Wright wrote:
>
> > But the main difference between the old and new versions (upgraded
> > today) is that the new version spews error messages from the
> > configuration files, 152 o
ks
> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 20:44:46 -0600
> From: Greg Marks
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: PDF displayed incorrectly by certain software
>
> Thanks for the replies. The most recent upgraded versions of Poppler
> in Debian 9 (libpoppler64:amd64 0.48.0-2
Hi,
On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 20:44:46 -0600
Greg Marks wrote:
> Thanks for the replies. The most recent upgraded versions of Poppler
> in Debian 9 (libpoppler64:amd64 0.48.0-2+deb9u2, libpoppler-glib8:amd64
> 0.48.0-2+deb9u2, poppler-utils 0.48.0-2+deb9u2, libpoppler-qt4-4:amd64
> 0.48.0-2+deb9u2, l
Hi,
On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 20:31:36 -0600
David Wright wrote:
> But the main difference between the old and new versions (upgraded
> today) is that the new version spews error messages from the
> configuration files, 152 of them in all.
>
> Here are the first few. (The program stammers.)
>
> Conf
display the file
https://gmarks.org/cklppaper.pdf
correctly. But qpdfview is still displaying gibberish.
Regards,
Greg Marks
> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 22:05:27 +0100
> From: Michael Lange
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Cc: Ionel Mugurel Ciobîcă
> Subject: [solved]Re
On Thu 25 Jan 2018 at 22:05:27 (+0100), Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 14:21:59 +0100
> Ionel Mugurel Ciobîcă wrote:
>
> > Downgraded some poppler packages and I can view now all pdf files
> > with xpdf. The difference between the old and new files now (for me)
> > is that th
Hi,
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 14:21:59 +0100
Ionel Mugurel Ciobîcă wrote:
> Downgraded some poppler packages and I can view now all pdf files
> with xpdf. The difference between the old and new files now (for me)
> is that they use (visible) different fonts.
Just for the record, today's upgrade to st
On 23-01-2018, at 10h 11'43", Curt wrote about "Re: PDF displayed incorrectly
by certain software"
>
> Same problem here with bank statements (recent bank statements unviewable in
> xpdf but viewable in evince).
>
> (Actually it appears the pdfs viewable in
On 23-01-2018, at 11h 18'26", Michael Lange wrote about "Re: PDF displayed
incorrectly by certain software"
> Hi again,
>
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:03:24 +0100
> Michael Lange wrote:
>
> uh no, appears to be rather this bug in libpoppler:
>
> https
Hi again,
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:03:24 +0100
Michael Lange wrote:
> just a shot in the dark: I think okular and qpdfview use qt, some of the
> "working" viewers seem to use gtk. Not sure about the toolkit xpdf and
> some of the other programs use, but maybe the problem has something to
> do with
On 2018-01-23, Ionel Mugurel Ciobîcă wrote:
> On 22-01-2018, at 18h 28'13", Greg Marks wrote about "PDF displayed
> incorrectly by certain software"
>> I have encountered a peculiar situation where a PDF file displays as
>> gibberish with certain PDF viewers but displays correctly with others.
>>
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 18:28:13 -0600
Greg Marks wrote:
> I have encountered a peculiar situation where a PDF file displays as
> gibberish with certain PDF viewers but displays correctly with others.
> The PDF file in question can be downloaded from the site:
>
>https://link.springer.com/a
ebian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: PDF displayed incorrectly by certain software
Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 01:15:16 + (UTC)
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On 22-01-2018, at 18h 28'13", Greg Marks wrote about "PDF displayed incorrectly by
certain software"
I have en
On 23-01-2018, at 13h 55'49", Richard Hector wrote about "Re: PDF displayed
incorrectly by certain software"
> 3) the stderr out from (at least) okular and xpdf look like they might
> be useful to someone who understands the topic better, but do look like
> something
On 22-01-2018, at 18h 28'13", Greg Marks wrote about "PDF displayed incorrectly
by certain software"
> I have encountered a peculiar situation where a PDF file displays as
> gibberish with certain PDF viewers but displays correctly with others.
> [...]
> numerous "Missing or bad Type3 CharProc ent
On 23/01/18 13:28, Greg Marks wrote:
> I have encountered a peculiar situation where a PDF file displays as
> gibberish with certain PDF viewers but displays correctly with others.
> The PDF file in question can be downloaded from the site:
>
>https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11856-0
From: abelahc...@gmail.com
thanks a lot
I think it is an encoding problem.
When I open it in embedde pdf reader in firefox, the a print it as a pdf file I
get same problem,
but if I print it as a PS file, the problem is fixed and the display is correct.
As far as I know this would make it a ps f
thanks a lot
I think it is an encoding problem.
When I open it in embedde pdf reader in firefox, the a print it as a pdf
file I get same problem,
but if I print it as a PS file, the problem is fixed and the display is
correct.
So the problem is in " pdf font" ?
by the way pdf uses font?
thanks
Brian is very knowledgeable in many areas but unless your request meets Brian's
specifications all you will get from him is criticism on how the request was
placed.
If you don't believe me check the archives of the list for this Brian-bot!
Original Message
Subject: pdf file is n
On Tue 20 Jun 2017 at 21:38:25 +0200, Yvan Masson wrote:
> First, please avoid written your emails in bold with a huge font, it is
> very annoying to read (this is probably the reason why you did no
> receive any answer).
No previous responses? Perhaps the mails had fonts too small for you to
see
Hi,
First, please avoid written your emails in bold with a huge font, it is
very annoying to read (this is probably the reason why you did no
receive any answer).
Le 20/06/2017 à 10:19, Abdelkader Belahcene a écrit :
> *Hi everybody,
> *
> *
> Strange, until today, I believed that a pdf file writ
On Tue, 20 Jun 2017 09:19:16 +0100
Abdelkader Belahcene wrote:
> *Hi everybody,*
>
>
>
> *Strange, until today, I believed that a pdf file written in any
> language can be read by a pdf reader, since it is binary !! For
> example evince, and not I was wrong !!The following file is a pdf
> file
On Tue 20 Jun 2017 at 09:19:16 +0100, Abdelkader Belahcene wrote:
> *Strange, until today, I believed that a pdf file written in any language
> can be read by a pdf reader, since it is binary !! For example evince, and
> not I was wrong !!The following file is a pdf file in Arabic, it is read
> co
Hi,
thanks a lot, this seemed to be what I have looked for.
#aptitude install xournal
bye Thomas
Am Donnerstag, 20. April 2017, 13:26:03 schrieb Thane of Athos:
> Hallo,
>
> ich würde dir Xournal empfehlen. Ist in den Repos.
>
> LG,
>
> Thanatos.
>
> On 04/20/2017 11:17 AM, Thomas wrote:
>
Hallo,
ich würde dir Xournal empfehlen. Ist in den Repos.
LG,
Thanatos.
On 04/20/2017 11:17 AM, Thomas wrote:
Hallo,
ich suche ein Programm um einfach eine Zeile oder ein paar Wörter unkenntlich
zu machen. Bei Windows hatte ich da ein Programm und konnte einfach mit einem
dicken Pinsel drübe
On 2017-04-20 11:17, Thomas wrote:
> Hallo,
> ich suche ein Programm um einfach eine Zeile oder ein paar Wörter unkenntlich
> zu machen. Bei Windows hatte ich da ein Programm und konnte einfach mit einem
> dicken Pinsel drüber gehen.
> Hier drucke ich das aus, gehe mit einem eding drüber und scan
Thomas wrote:
> ich suche ein Programm um einfach eine Zeile oder ein paar Wörter
> unkenntlich zu machen. Bei Windows hatte ich da ein Programm und
> konnte einfach mit einem dicken Pinsel drüber gehen.
Master PDF Editor for Linux can do this, it can edit text as well.
https://code-industry.net/f
Hi,
Thomas wrote:
> Hallo
Deutsch gutt. debian-user-ger...@lists.debian.org besser. :))
Well the answer to the question about a PDF editor in Debian, which
can blacken text lines, would be of interest to me. Not so much because
i need to remove info from PDF but because i look for a PDF editor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:17:44AM +0200, Thomas wrote:
> Hallo,
> ich suche ein Programm um einfach eine Zeile oder ein paar Wörter unkenntlich
> zu machen. Bei Windows hatte ich da ein Programm und konnte einfach mit einem
> dicken Pinsel drüber ge
Am 20.04.2017 um 11:17 schrieb Thomas:
> Hallo,
> ich suche ein Programm um einfach eine Zeile oder ein paar Wörter unkenntlich
> zu machen. Bei Windows hatte ich da ein Programm und konnte einfach mit einem
> dicken Pinsel drüber gehen.
> Hier drucke ich das aus, gehe mit einem eding drüber un
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 09:57:04PM +1000, win...@tpg.com.au wrote:
> Dear debian-user
> How can i install pdf reader for beaglebone debian. Please give me
> command line and link.Thanks
What have you tried, and what didn't work for you?
Have you installed *any* software on it yet?
--
"If you're
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 10:40:47PM +1000, Matthew Chong wrote:
> If you have dpkg and frontends (apt, aptitude etc) you can easily install
> zathura PDF viewer with "sudo apt-get install zathura", which is a
> minimalist PDF viewer.
You've done that on the Beaglebone have you?
--
"If you're not
1 - 100 of 493 matches
Mail list logo