I have used many Linux distros going back to the mid 90's
Red hat, SuSE, and a few FreeBSD tests as well and for me the use of
external modems was for the most part a necessity. Multitech
(Mt5600series) was one of the best and still is, also I used external
Supra data/fax Modems
and the USR v
On 4. September 2005 at 2:01PM -0700,
Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Ewart wrote:
[...]
> > Perhaps the original poster should explain his motivation for
> > requiring an internal PCI modem?
> >
> > Dave.
> >
> >
> All I want it for is callerid on a sarge based myth system.
>
> The re
Nuke wrote:
My understanding is that a modem that has a controller will work from Linux,
with no additional driver, by being associated with an RS232 serial port.
This is obviously the COM1 or COM2 if external. If internal, the Linux
compatible modem will also have a UART chip so it becomes
Hans du Plooy wrote :
>External USB modems are often no more than the usual winmodem in a shell.
That's interesting, I did not know that.
My understanding is that a modem that has a controller will work from Linux,
with no additional driver, by being associated with an RS232 serial port.
Th
Nuke wrote:
Hans du Plooy said :-
If* you manage to track them [internal modems] down, the ones that still
exsist cost aboutas much as an external serial modem, so why not just get
one of those?
This reaction is fairly typical when internal modems are mentioned in the
Linux world, a
I use a Multitech MT5634ZPX-PCI. It is not a WinModem - it is quality kit
with an on board controller, which is what an internal modem needs for
Linux.
Hans du Plooy said :-
>If* you manage to track them [internal modems] down, the ones that still
>exsist cost aboutas much as an external seri
Dave Ewart wrote:
On Sunday, 04.09.2005 at 12:35 +0200, Hans du Plooy wrote:
Is there any PCI modems that will just work with a stock debian
sarge kernel 2.6.8?
*If* you manage to track them down, the ones that still exsist cost
about as much as an external serial modem, so why not
On Sunday 04 September 2005 03:30 am, Mike wrote:
> Is there any PCI modems that will just work with a stock debian sarge
> kernel 2.6.8?
Sufficiently ground, most internal modems will make some pretty horrible
coffee, but still better than they do a modem. Just get a plain old external
serial
Mike wrote:
Is there any PCI modems that will just work with a stock debian sarge
kernel 2.6.8?
I agree with Bob. I'd get a USR 5610B modem if you must have a PCI
modem. They're fairly pricey but it's worth the money.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
On Sunday 04 September 2005 06:30 am, Mike wrote:
> Is there any PCI modems that will just work with a stock debian sarge
> kernel 2.6.8? Like does newegg sell any modems that will just work
> without a huge hassle of tracking down a driver or some add-on crappy
> binary from some company who doesn
On Sunday, 04.09.2005 at 12:35 +0200, Hans du Plooy wrote:
> > Is there any PCI modems that will just work with a stock debian
> > sarge kernel 2.6.8?
>
> *If* you manage to track them down, the ones that still exsist cost
> about as much as an external serial modem, so why not just get one of
> t
> Is there any PCI modems that will just work with a stock debian sarge
> kernel 2.6.8?
*If* you manage to track them down, the ones that still exsist cost about
as much as an external serial modem, so why not just get one of those?
Hans
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
Looks strange. Do you have windoze on your computer? Usually you can obtain
same information from there. By the way what kind of modem do you have?
Slaven
On Tuesday 14 August 2001 10:38, Wayne wrote:
> I don't think I have a winmodem. The whole entry from the cat command
> looks like this-
>
>
I don't think I have a winmodem. The whole entry from the cat command
looks like this-
Bus 0, device 8, function 0:
Communication controller: PCI device 11d4:1805 (Anolog Device) (rev 0).
IRQ 5.
Master Capable. Latency=32. Min Gnt=1.Max Lat=255.
Prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0x002000 [0xde0020ff].
On Tuesday 14 August 2001 10:03, dman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 07:45:16AM -0400, Wayne wrote:
> | Hi,
> | I'm trying to get a PCI modem working on a Redhat 7.1 distribution.
> | I excuted the following command to see where the system saw the card.
> | cat /proc/pci > pci.txt
> | Looking at
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 07:45:16AM -0400, Wayne wrote:
| Hi,
| I'm trying to get a PCI modem working on a Redhat 7.1 distribution.
| I excuted the following command to see where the system saw the card.
| cat /proc/pci > pci.txt
| Looking at the file I see that the system see the card on IRQ 5 but
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 12:59:20PM +0100, Aaron Hess wrote:
> Hi,
> I have recently installed debian on my computer and am
> having big problems installing my SupraExpress Diamond
> 56i V pro modem. Please could someone help me (no
> modem, no linux :(
Make sure your modem is supported. Take a l
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 12:59:20PM +0100, Aaron Hess wrote:
> I have recently installed debian on my computer and am
> having big problems installing my SupraExpress Diamond
> 56i V pro modem. Please could someone help me (no
> modem, no linux :(
Since you're not telling WHAT problems, I can hardl
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Curtis Hogg wrote:
buckmi >>
buckmi >> 4. reboot.
buckmi >
buckmi >Done, but modem still doesn't respond to anything.
buckmi >
buckmi >
buckmi >Any other ideas?
buckmi >
buckmi >-- Curtis Hogg
to see if it is a winmodem or not i'd email the company that makes it and
ask them
My roommate has a PCI modem as well, though it's made by ESS not Wisecom..
supposedly it's not a Winmodem, but who can really tell.
> assigned to a serial device. Do the following:
>
> 1. make sure you have pciutils installed.
Check
>
> 2. run lspci -v and look for a reference to the "serial c
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Roso Giuseppe (Beppe) wrote:
> One of my friends have a Wisecom intenal (PCI) Modem.
> Someone can explain me which module I must include in kernel to use this
> modem?
--
I believe most of the Wisecom modems were LT (Lucent Technologies) Winmodems.
The Wisecom site is www.wi
WINmodem ?
Matth
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Roso Giuseppe (Beppe) wrote:
> One of my friends have a Wisecom intenal (PCI) Modem.
> Someone can explain me which module I must include in kernel to use this
> modem?
> >From last compilation I found out in
> /proc/pci
> a line like
> communication ca
On Thu, 3 Jun 1999 14:11:32 -0400 (EDT), you wrote:
>
>On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, Oleg Krivosheev wrote:
>[snip]
>> there are several PCI modems usable under linux, i believe.
>> Find below how to do it
>>
>>***INSTALLATION OF V90 PCI LUCENT VENUS BASED MODEM***
>>
>[snip]
>
>I am delighte
On Thu, Jun 03, 1999 at 10:12:27AM -0500, Robert Rati wrote:
> I was just given a PCI modem by a friend of mine and he calims it's a PNP
> modem but not a winmodem. I hope he's right, but I don't know how to tell
> if it's a winmodem. Debian sees the modem when I cat /proc/pci and calls
> it a se
Thanks a lot Oleg. You have helped a lot of us!!
On Thu, 3 Jun 1999 Oleg Krivosheev wrote:
>
> On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, Robert Rati wrote:
>
> > Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 10:12:27 -0500 (EST)
> > From: Robert Rati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: PCI modem
> > Re
shaleh writes:
> *ALL* PCI modems I have seen are windows modems (winmodem is actually a
> USR tm).
Multitech reportedly sells a non-winmodem PCI modem.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, Oleg Krivosheev wrote:
[snip]
> there are several PCI modems usable under linux, i believe.
> Find below how to do it
>
>***INSTALLATION OF V90 PCI LUCENT VENUS BASED MODEM***
>
[snip]
I am delighted to have this information.
Would you please name other PCI mod
On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, Robert Rati wrote:
> Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 10:12:27 -0500 (EST)
> From: Robert Rati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: PCI modem
> Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 15:23:43 +
> Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Resent-cc: recipient lis
The problem is not that it's a "winmodem". The winmodem was an ISA device which
didn't
represent itself to the system as a serial interface but rather had a more
low-level
interface which required your host CPU to do a lot of the work a modem
generally does
on its own. The problem is simply that
*ALL* PCI modems I have seen are windows modems (winmodem is actually a USR tm).
At least you did not pay for it (-:
Alex writes:
> I had an ISA modem. I've recently bought another
> modem, but it's PCI.
As far as I know, Multitech makes the only non-winmodem PCI modem.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
On Fri, 19 Feb 1999, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had an ISA modem. I've recently bought another
> mothem, but it's PCI. The problem is that the system doesn't
> recognize it. Windows 98 recognizes it as a modem on COM3,
> using IRQ 9. I reconfigured pppd (using pppconfig) to use
> ttyS2 (= MS
On Wed, 4 Nov 1998, Rakesh Mohan wrote:
> I have PCI inter modem (AOpen FM 56H) on my PC. It works well with NT
> 4.0, but i am not able to configure it for debian 2.0
I think all of AOpen's modems are software based, like the USR WinModems.
Without the drivers (of which their are none for linux
33 matches
Mail list logo
