Re: PAM problems

2001-12-19 Thread Blake Barnett
I have the same setup. The only difference is I run cucipop as a standalone daemon (I recommend this anyway). It works as expected. My pam config is identical, you may want to try running it as a daemon instead, also, check the bug reports on the bugtracking system on debian.org. On Wed, 2001-

Re: PAM problems

2001-12-19 Thread David Purton
On Wed, 19 Dec 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi David! > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 11:01:30PM +1030, David Purton wrote: > > /etc/pam.d/cucipop contains this: > > > > auth required pam_unix_auth.so > > account required pam_unix_acct.so > > Probably barking up the wrong tree, but

Re: PAM problems

2001-12-19 Thread sean
Hi David! On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 11:01:30PM +1030, David Purton wrote: > /etc/pam.d/cucipop contains this: > > auth required pam_unix_auth.so > account required pam_unix_acct.so Probably barking up the wrong tree, but most of the files in my /etc/pam.d/ directory use pam_unix.s

Re: PAM problems

1999-09-15 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 05:01:52PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 06:00:17AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 03:25:45PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I have problems with PAM apps since the last upgrade forced them onto my > > > system. > > >

Re: PAM problems

1999-09-15 Thread lexchive
On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 06:00:17AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 03:25:45PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I have problems with PAM apps since the last upgrade forced them onto my > > system. > > > Hmm...seems like you have basic functionality, just a few nitpicks. The

Re: PAM problems

1999-09-15 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 03:25:45PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have problems with PAM apps since the last upgrade forced them onto my > system. > > First: pam_env.so outputs messages about non alpha-numeric variable names in > /etc/environment when i login. The funny things is, those varia