Re: PAM not working reliably

2002-06-25 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 01:39:24AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: | So why is it if I have /etc/shadow owned by root:shadow, group has read | access, and mail in the shadow group, exim can't authenticate through | PAM. If I chown /etc/shadow to root:mail, it works...WTF? I haven't checked it, but m

Re: PAM not working reliably

2002-06-25 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 05:19:59PM +0800, Crispin Wellington wrote: > > So why is it if I have /etc/shadow owned by root:shadow, group has read > > access, and mail in the shadow group, exim can't authenticate through > > PAM. > PAM (running at the

Re: PAM not working reliably

2002-06-25 Thread Crispin Wellington
On Tue, 2002-06-25 at 16:39, Paul Johnson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > So why is it if I have /etc/shadow owned by root:shadow, group has read > access, and mail in the shadow group, exim can't authenticate through > PAM. If I chown /etc/shadow to root:mail, it wor