On 2017-06-22 at 12:53, Wellington Terumi Uemura wrote:
> * Who does it? I use 30 tabs max.
Over the course of the past two years (give or take), I've managed to
reduce my open-tab count on my primary computer to a current count of
only 426 - but my peak was 5,190 simultaneous open tabs. I hope t
* Who does it? I use 30 tabs max.
* I don't know, I'm a right hand. You can install and figure it out I guess.
* Not that I'm aware of, BUT, instead of recover tabs you can look at
history and recover from there without using huge amount of resource on
your HDD to show all the tabs you had ope
On Fri, 13 May 2016, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 13 May 2016 01:39:23 Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > Guess I'm stuck with the unsupported Chrome. No biggie.
>
> Because Chrome is unsupported for Wheezy and 32 bit, pepper flash is
> unsupported for Wheezy and 32 bit. It makes no difference which o
On Friday 13 May 2016 09:44:43 Curt wrote:
> On 2016-05-13, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Friday 13 May 2016 01:39:23 Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >> Guess I'm stuck with the unsupported Chrome. No biggie.
> >
> > Because Chrome is unsupported for Wheezy and 32 bit, pepper flash is
> > unsupported for Whee
On 2016-05-13, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 13 May 2016 01:39:23 Patrick Bartek wrote:
>> Guess I'm stuck with the unsupported Chrome. No biggie.
>
> Because Chrome is unsupported for Wheezy and 32 bit, pepper flash is
> unsupported for Wheezy and 32 bit. It makes no difference which of the
>
On Friday 13 May 2016 01:39:23 Patrick Bartek wrote:
> Guess I'm stuck with the unsupported Chrome. No biggie.
Because Chrome is unsupported for Wheezy and 32 bit, pepper flash is
unsupported for Wheezy and 32 bit. It makes no difference which of the
browsers that you use that uses pepper flas
On 30/10/2014, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 05:56:25PM +0100, Siard wrote:
>> I just installed the x86_64 version in my new PC (amd64) with 'dpkg -i'.
>> After trying to 'apt-get install' the 3 gstreamer*-dependencies,
>> I followed apt's advice to try 'apt-get -f install'
El 2011-02-02 a las 15:23 -0500, Paul Cartwright escribió:
(resending to the list)
> On 02/02/2011 01:53 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>> BTW, I just have installed today (in Squeeze+GNOME) all major browsers,
>> that is: Firefox 4 (beta), Google Chrome and Opera (as part of my web
>> developer tasks I nee
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 13:33:33 -0500, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On 02/02/2011 09:33 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>> It only happens within Opera? Try to launch it with another user that
>> has a clean .opera profile ("gksu opera" will open Opera as "root") and
>> check if the copy/paste weird behaviour remain
On 02/02/2011 09:33 AM, Camaleón wrote:
It only happens within Opera? Try to launch it with another user that has
a clean .opera profile ("gksu opera" will open Opera as "root") and check
if the copy/paste weird behaviour remains.
no it does not happen under KDE with my wifes' account. With
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 06:55:07 -0500, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> I have a problem with Chrome not working right. I click on a link & it
> does nothing( something about a plugin missing). So I started up Opera
> 11.01 build 1190. when I get to the page I want, I tried to COPY the URL
> & PASTE into an
Hi Jim,
On 1/29/08, hce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does the opera browser has caches when I view the web pages?
Yes, Opera caches web pages. You'll find them here:
Tools/Preferences/Advanced/History. You can also empty the
cache there.
Have you tried to reload a page/frame.
... sometime I cou
On Mon January 28 2008, hce wrote:
> Does the opera browser has caches when I view the web pages? I am
> using an opera browser in my debian, it works all fine until yesterday
> when I connected the PC to a new purchased one Ethernet port ADSL
> modem. Sometime I could see the whole configuration p
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 03:49:13PM -0400, Rick wrote:
> Notice, that Opera can do all of this (email, usenet, rss feeds, irc, web
> surfing, contacts... and more, inside one app, and all at the same time.
> Now that I said that is anyone running Opera using All of its abilities.?
> and if so
Hi.
P Kapat, 01.09.2007 00:29:
> One thing that annoys me
> is that if you come across a .torrent file on the net, using opera, it
> doesn't give you a option to just download the .torrent file or even
> better open with another application.
Never tried to change that behaviour? See Preferences →
On 8/31/07, Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Notice, that Opera can do all of this (email, usenet, rss feeds, irc, web
> surfing, contacts... and more, inside one app, and all at the same time.
And also download torrents!!!
> Now that I said that is anyone running Opera using All of its abil
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 09:50:37PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> Considering that Opera seems to be faster than Iceweasel or Konqueror
> AND it brings additional value with the mail and IRC client it is a
> pretty strong alternative. Right now the only things keeping me back are
> the licence
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 12:37:19PM -0400, Rick wrote:
> Thought I would ask, to see if anyone has drop kmail (kde-pim) and switch
> over, to Opera to use it for email, web, IRC, IM, etc
> how does it compare ? any advantages, besides a single app verus multiply
> apps..
> Kinda like the idea
On Friday 03 August 2007 12:37 pm, Rick wrote:
> Thought I would ask, to see if anyone has drop kmail (kde-pim) and switch
> over, to Opera to use it for email, web, IRC, IM, etc how does it
> compare ? any advantages, besides a single app verus multiply apps.. Kinda
> like the idea, of a unifi
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 07:20:10AM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> I know opera in Debian is faster on my two-seater than iceweasel. But
> that is when it reads my wordpress blog. But in most other sites the
> advertisements get in the way and then it is slower again.
So for me it might just
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote in Article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to
gmane.linux.debian.user:
>> Firefox in Windows is faster than Iceweasel/Firefox in Debian and
>> Ubuntu. Firefox in Windows is faster than Swiftfox in Debian/Ubuntu.
>> Firefox in Zenwalk is faster than Iceweasel/Firefox/Swiftfox in
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tejas yazmış:
> Firefox in Windows is faster than Iceweasel/Firefox in Debian and
> Ubuntu. Firefox in Windows is faster than Swiftfox in Debian/Ubuntu.
> Firefox in Zenwalk is faster than Iceweasel/Firefox/Swiftfox in
> Debian.(may be it is because of
Paul Johnson wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote in Article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to
gmane.linux.debian.user:
On an unrelated matter I installed Opera on Sid.
It *is* faster than iceweasel.
But because it hasn't got the ease of the adblock extension, that turns
out to be a wash.
You mean bein
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote in Article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to
gmane.linux.debian.user:
> On an unrelated matter I installed Opera on Sid.
>
> It *is* faster than iceweasel.
>
> But because it hasn't got the ease of the adblock extension, that turns
> out to be a wash.
You mean being a propriet
tejas wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sam Leon yazmış:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
tejas wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Firefox in Windows is faster than Iceweasel/Firefox in Debian and
Ubuntu. Firefox in Windows is faster than Swiftfox
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sam Leon yazmış:
>
>
> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>> tejas wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Firefox in Windows is faster than Iceweasel/Firefox in Debian and
>>> Ubuntu. Firefox in Windows is faster than Swiftfox in De
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
tejas wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Firefox in Windows is faster than Iceweasel/Firefox in Debian and
Ubuntu. Firefox in Windows is faster than Swiftfox in Debian/Ubuntu.
Firefox in Zenwalk is faster than Iceweasel/Firefox/Swiftfox in
Debian.(may be
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:20:10 -0500
Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know opera in Debian is faster on my two-seater than iceweasel. But
> that is when it reads my wordpress blog. But in most other sites the
> advertisements get in the way and then it is slower again.
Then block th
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
tejas wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Firefox in Windows is faster than Iceweasel/Firefox in Debian and
Ubuntu. Firefox in Windows is faster than Swiftfox in Debian/Ubuntu.
Firefox in Zenwalk is faster than Iceweasel/Firefox/Swiftfox in
Debian.(may
tejas wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Firefox in Windows is faster than Iceweasel/Firefox in Debian and
Ubuntu. Firefox in Windows is faster than Swiftfox in Debian/Ubuntu.
Firefox in Zenwalk is faster than Iceweasel/Firefox/Swiftfox in
Debian.(may be it is because of Zenwal
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 1:58 pm, Jon Dowland wrote:
> > Why are you so anti-tabs? I find tab browsing to be a lot
> > faster and easier to switch between tabs then trying to
> > open multiple windows/instances.
>
> Perhaps his window manager handles tabs for him. It can then
> be confusing to be fa
> Why are you so anti-tabs? I find tab browsing to be a lot
> faster and easier to switch between tabs then trying to
> open multiple windows/instances.
Perhaps his window manager handles tabs for him. It can then
be confusing to be faced with three paradigms: which window,
then which tab in that
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 21:39:41 +
steef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On an unrelated matter I installed Opera on Sid.
> >
> > It *is* faster than iceweasel.
> >
> > But because it hasn't got the ease of the adblock extension, that
> > turns out to be a wash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Firefox in Windows is faster than Iceweasel/Firefox in Debian and
Ubuntu. Firefox in Windows is faster than Swiftfox in Debian/Ubuntu.
Firefox in Zenwalk is faster than Iceweasel/Firefox/Swiftfox in
Debian.(may be it is because of Zenwalk's low mem usa
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 12:20:33 -0700, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On an unrelated matter I installed Opera on Sid.
>> >
>> > It *is* faster than iceweasel.
>> >
>> I have always thought that FireFox was faster than Opera.
>
> Seamonkey it's the fastest.
None faster than elinks. ;-)
I
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
On an unrelated matter I installed Opera on Sid.
It *is* faster than iceweasel.
But because it hasn't got the ease of the adblock extension, that
turns out to be a wash.
Hugo
no no no. seamonkey is the fastest.
steef
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
ArcticFox wrote:
On Jul 9, 2007, at 2:55 PM, Sam Leon wrote:
Matthew K Poer wrote:On Monday 09 July 2007 3:14 pm, Sam Leon wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
On an unrelated matter I installed Opera on Sid.
It *is* faster
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 15:45:06 -0400
Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 03:25:40PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> [...]
> > We discuss this every now and then (I use privoxy), but is there any
> > convenient way to easily add stuff that privoxy misses to its config
> > file
On Jul 9, 2007, at 2:55 PM, Sam Leon wrote:
Matthew K Poer wrote:On Monday 09 July 2007 3:14 pm, Sam Leon wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
On an unrelated matter I installed Opera on Sid.
It *is* faster than iceweasel.
But because it hasn't got the ease of the adblock extension, tha
Octavio Alvarez wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:17:45 -0700, Orestes leal
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:05:11 -0400
Matthew K Poer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 09 July 2007 1:06 pm, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On an unrelated matter I installed Opera on Sid.
>
>
Matthew K Poer wrote:
On Monday 09 July 2007 3:14 pm, Sam Leon wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
On an unrelated matter I installed Opera on Sid.
It *is* faster than iceweasel.
But because it hasn't got the ease of the adblock extension, that
turns out to be a wash.
Hugo
I
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 03:25:40PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
[...]
> We discuss this every now and then (I use privoxy), but is there any
> convenient way to easily add stuff that privoxy misses to its config
> files? Also, the default Debian privoxy runs once as root; adblock can
> obviously be confi
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 19:26:32 +0200
Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 12:06:35 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On an unrelated matter I installed Opera on Sid.
> >
> > It *is* faster than iceweasel.
> >
> > But because it hasn't got the ease of the adb
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:19:12 -0700
"Octavio Alvarez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:17:45 -0700, Orestes leal
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:05:11 -0400
> > Matthew K Poer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Monday 09 July 2007 1:06 pm, Hugo Van
On Monday 09 July 2007 3:14 pm, Sam Leon wrote:
> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On an unrelated matter I installed Opera on Sid.
> >
> > It *is* faster than iceweasel.
> >
> > But because it hasn't got the ease of the adblock extension, that
> > turns out to be a wash.
> >
> > Hugo
>
> I r
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
On an unrelated matter I installed Opera on Sid.
It *is* faster than iceweasel.
But because it hasn't got the ease of the adblock extension, that
turns out to be a wash.
Hugo
I really want to use opera but I can't because it seems to force you to
use tabs >
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 01:32:04PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 10:19:12AM -0700, Octavio Alvarez wrote:
> > On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:17:45 -0700, Orestes leal
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:05:11 -0400
> > >Matthew K Poer <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 12:06:35 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On an unrelated matter I installed Opera on Sid.
>
> It *is* faster than iceweasel.
>
> But because it hasn't got the ease of the adblock extension, that turns out
> to be a wash.
Privoxy does a decent job of filtering ads,
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 10:19:12AM -0700, Octavio Alvarez wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:17:45 -0700, Orestes leal
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:05:11 -0400
> >Matthew K Poer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>On Monday 09 July 2007 1:06 pm, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> >>
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:17:45 -0700, Orestes leal
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:05:11 -0400
Matthew K Poer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 09 July 2007 1:06 pm, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On an unrelated matter I installed Opera on Sid.
>
> It *is* faster than ic
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:05:11 -0400
Matthew K Poer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 09 July 2007 1:06 pm, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On an unrelated matter I installed Opera on Sid.
> >
> > It *is* faster than iceweasel.
> >
> > But because it hasn't got the ease of the adblock ext
On Monday 09 July 2007 1:06 pm, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On an unrelated matter I installed Opera on Sid.
>
> It *is* faster than iceweasel.
>
> But because it hasn't got the ease of the adblock extension, that turns
> out to be a wash.
>
> Hugo
Are you *begging* for a flame war?
I have a
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 09:13 -0500, Dennis G. Wicks wrote:
> Greetings;
>
> Just reinstalled the latest version of Opera but when I start it I get
>
> dgwicks:~# opera http://www.debian.org
> ERROR: ld.so: object 'libjvm.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded:
> ignored.
> ERROR: ld.so: object '
Marc Shapiro wrote:
Dennis G. Wicks wrote:
Greetings;
Just reinstalled the latest version of Opera but when I start it I get
dgwicks:~# opera http://www.debian.org
ERROR: ld.so: object 'libjvm.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded:
ignored.
ERROR: ld.so: object 'libawt.so' from LD_PRELOAD c
Dennis G. Wicks wrote:
Greetings;
Just reinstalled the latest version of Opera but when I start it I get
dgwicks:~# opera http://www.debian.org
ERROR: ld.so: object 'libjvm.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded:
ignored.
ERROR: ld.so: object 'libawt.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded:
I'm running opera perfectly now, but I had problems too with the
second-last version.
This one works fine (sid):
> osmosis:~# dpkg-query -s opera
> Package: opera
> Status: install ok installed
> Priority: optional
> Section: non-free/web
> Installed-Size: 12768
> Maintainer: Opera Packaging Team
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:13:51 -0500
"Dennis G. Wicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings;
>
> Just reinstalled the latest version of Opera but when I start it I get
>
> dgwicks:~# opera http://www.debian.org
> ERROR: ld.so: object 'libjvm.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded:
> ignored.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/23/07 09:13, Dennis G. Wicks wrote:
> Greetings;
>
> Just reinstalled the latest version of Opera but when I start it I get
>
> dgwicks:~# opera http://www.debian.org
> ERROR: ld.so: object 'libjvm.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded:
> ign
Thanks, the weekly snapshot works great.
-- Mark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 10:04:04AM -0600, Mark Zimmerman wrote..
> After doing an 'aptitude upgrade' this morning (which brought a boatload of
> X changes), I can no longer use opera due to a segmentation fault upon
> startup. The problem seems to be related to the QT library; here is some gd
Hello Mark Zimmerman.
Mark Zimmerman, 07.04.2007 18:04:
> After doing an 'aptitude upgrade' this morning (which brought a
> boatload of X changes), I can no longer use opera due to a
> segmentation fault upon startup.
This is a known problem. Either downgrade libx11-6 and libx11-devto version
2:1
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 05:02:45PM -0600, CW Harris wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 11:03:26AM -0400, Christopher Judd wrote:
[...]
> Also the opera web page has some troubleshooting info for java:
>
> http://www.opera.com/support/search/supsearch.dml?name=java&maxhits=15&platform=linux
Also, as
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 11:03:26AM -0400, Christopher Judd wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> I was wondering how to use opera with java. When starting opera
> with the -debugjava option, I get the following message:
>
> opera: [java] There seems to be a preloaded version of Xt.
>There is a work
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 06:37:30AM -0700, Blake Covarrubias wrote:
> Well, it works. :) Doesn't segfault on startup like the first preview
> release did. :)
For various definitions of "works", yeah. :) For instance, the
quicksearch bar is dead, and the 'g search terms' in the url bar trick
d
Blake Covarrubias wrote:
On Sun, 2003-03-23 at 23:38, Alex Togstad wrote:
You can get the second preview of Opera 7 for Linux here:
http://snapshot.opera.com/unix/intel-linux/365-20030307-7.0.0-P2/
I have not tired this yet, as I'm eager to see the results of someone
try it first. :-)
Let me kno
On Sun, 2003-03-23 at 23:38, Alex Togstad wrote:
> You can get the second preview of Opera 7 for Linux here:
>
> http://snapshot.opera.com/unix/intel-linux/365-20030307-7.0.0-P2/
>
> I have not tired this yet, as I'm eager to see the results of someone
> try it first. :-)
>
> Let me know how it
You can get the second preview of Opera 7 for Linux here:
http://snapshot.opera.com/unix/intel-linux/365-20030307-7.0.0-P2/
I have not tired this yet, as I'm eager to see the results of someone
try it first. :-)
Let me know how it goes, if you do install it. :0)
Take care!
Alex Togstad
We
Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
Does anyone know when the debian package for Opera 7 is going to be
released? I just tried to update and it says that 6.03 is the latest.
thanks :)
emma
never, Debian doesn't package opera because it is non-free. If you mean
when will a .deb become available, well, you'd
On Sun, 2003-03-23 at 21:02, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
> Does anyone know when the debian package for Opera 7 is going to be
> released? I just tried to update and it says that 6.03 is the latest.
>
> thanks :)
>
> emma
>
> --
> Emma Jane Hogbin
> [[ 416 417 2868 ][ www.xtrinsic.com ]]
>
If you
on Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 06:57:12PM +0100, Florian Sukup ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm installing Debian on an old machine. Therefore, I need a fast browser.
We just discussed this topic here.
For anything PII-300+, I'd suggest Galeon, Mozilla, or Konqueror. Not
snappy, but damned go
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 06:57:12PM +0100, Florian Sukup wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm installing Debian on an old machine. Therefore, I need a fast browser.
>
> So, I thought Opera could be a good idea. But I can't find a package
> including it (at least not bin/opera).
>
> Is there a debian package fo
Hi,
Just download the Linux version from here :
http://www.opera.com/download/index.dml?platform=linux&session=
Just select the option deb and QT Static. I have it installed on my Debian
3.0 PowerPC and it works a treat. I bought a licence to (upgrade infact)
for $15.
Very easy to install to,
ftp.opera.com/pub/opera/linux/505 but I don't think it does java. The
5.0-1 on their website may be newer, I don't know.
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 08:20, Francois Chenais wrote:
> I have
> - Opera 5.
> - j2re1.3_1.3.0.2_i386.deb
>
> but nothing works !:-|
>
> Opera 6.0 is very sl
I have
- Opera 5.0
- j2re1.3_1.3.0.2_i386.deb
but nothing works !:-|
Opera 6.0 is very slow.
Where can I get Opera 5.05 ?
Don't find it on opera.com !
Thanks
François
On 11 Apr 2002 16:47:25 -0500
Dale Hair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hope that helps,
> Florentin.
>
>
> On 11 Apr 2002, Dale Hair wrote :
>
> | Date: 11 Apr 2002 19:23:57 -0500
> | From: Dale Hair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> | Subject: Re: opera and java plugins
> | Resent-Dat
Check www.opera.com - try to install "openmotif"
which is necessary in order the plug-in to work.
Hope that helps,
Florentin.
On 11 Apr 2002, Dale Hair wrote :
| Date: 11 Apr 2002 19:23:57 -0500
| From: Dale Hair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| To: debian-user@lists.debian.o
On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 18:52, Paul F. Pearson wrote:
> On 11 Apr 2002, Dale Hair wrote:
>
> > Installing blackdown java setup java plugins automatically for opera,
> > mozilla and netscape for me.
> > ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/linux/devel/lang/java/blackdown.org/debian/dists/woody/non-free/binary-i
On 11 Apr 2002, Dale Hair wrote:
> Installing blackdown java setup java plugins automatically for opera,
> mozilla and netscape for me.
> ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/linux/devel/lang/java/blackdown.org/debian/dists/woody/non-free/binary-i386/j2re1.3_1.3.0.2_i386.deb
>
On my LinuxPPC woody distro,
Installing blackdown java setup java plugins automatically for opera,
mozilla and netscape for me.
ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/linux/devel/lang/java/blackdown.org/debian/dists/woody/non-free/binary-i386/j2re1.3_1.3.0.2_i386.deb
On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 09:23, François Chenais wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002 22:09:40 -0600
shock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i've finally become enamored with KDE's anti-aliasing fonts. they look
> great in konqueror. opera, however, seems to use it's own font scheme.
> does anyone know what needs to be done to make opera use the
> anti-aliasing font
* mikepolniak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
>
> You will need qt and the dynamic -linked version of opera.
>
beautiful. thanks!
--
) ,_),_)
(-(__ |_ _ _ |/
) | |(_)(_ |\
( \_,
___
| http://www.exitwound.org
Hall Stevenson wrote:
>
> My problem is that I can't get it to recognize my Java installation. I
> downloaded Sun's J2RE as suggested by Opera's website. I've tried the
> various instructions they give for enabling Java too -- all with no
> luck.
> Has anyone tried this newest version ?? If so,
On 21 May 2001 01:14:59 +0800, csj whispered to the router:
!! Maybe you should just follow the Debian motto. When in doubt,
recompile.
i thought that was slackware's motto
--
Forrest English
http://truffula.net/~forrest
"America is at that akward stage, it is too late to work within the
On 19 May 2001 13:20:04 -0400, MaD dUCK wrote:
> also sprach Stephen E. Hargrove (on Fri, 18 May 2001 07:03:42PM -0500):
> > i'm running woody and have it installed:
>
> that's probably the problem - since i am running woody on one machine
> where it works, and potato on the one where it doesn't.
Subject: Re: [users] Re: opera
Date: Sat, May 19, 2001 at 01:20:04PM -0400
In reply to:MaD dUCK
Quoting MaD dUCK([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> also sprach Stephen E. Hargrove (on Fri, 18 May 2001 07:03:42PM -0500):
> > i'm running woody and have it installed:
>
>
--On Friday, May 18, 2001 10:06 PM -0400 Brian Nelson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 08:42:15PM -0500, Dana J . Laude wrote:
Actually, it's all configurable. Ya just got to play with
the settings. Personally after you get the hang of things
it's not bad for free. I don't
also sprach Brian Nelson (on Fri, 18 May 2001 09:12:57PM -0400):
> Can't say I'm all that impressed with it though. The damn toolbar/ad
> crap takes up half the damn screen. Maybe you're not missing out on
> much...
i have a registered version and i wouldn't want to substitute it for
any of skip
also sprach Stephen E. Hargrove (on Fri, 18 May 2001 07:03:42PM -0500):
> i'm running woody and have it installed:
that's probably the problem - since i am running woody on one machine
where it works, and potato on the one where it doesn't.
but i should be able to install all these dependencies w
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 10:06:15PM -0400, Brian Nelson wrote:
> > the settings. Personally after you get the hang of things
> > it's not bad for free. I don't even pay attention to the
> > banner ads.
>
> It's all configurable... except for the toolbar with the ads which is
> the biggest and m
You can kill that opera ad by pressing F11 and browsing in full screen mode
Cheers
Joel
--
No, Gates always knew the Internet was going to be important,
just as Oceania has always been at war with East Asia. ;)
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 09:43:04PM -0700, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote:
> Reset your ur screen res. Is good beyond 800x... I know what you mean, I had
> it running on a laptop at 640, not much room left for rendering eh!
Heh, well I'm running at 1600x1200 and I still don't like it. I guess
I'm pick
Hey,
Reset your ur screen res. Is good beyond 800x... I know what you mean, I had
it running on a laptop at 640, not much room left for rendering eh!
imnsho, opera dusts nutscrape, slowzilla and konq on most sites. Konq is
gonna rock shortly, the coders seem to be hell bent for the gold on it.
On Fri, 18 May 2001 21:06:15 Brian Nelson wrote:
> It's all configurable... except for the toolbar with the ads which
is
> the biggest and most annoying one. I played with it for a while
but
> couldn't come up with a configuration I liked.
>
> Besides, it's not free in any sense of the word, un
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Brian Nelson wrote:
>
> Can't say I'm all that impressed with it though. The damn toolbar/ad
> crap takes up half the damn screen. Maybe you're not missing out on
> much...
i guess i've been using it so long that i don't really
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 08:42:15PM -0500, Dana J . Laude wrote:
> On Fri, 18 May 2001 20:12:57 Brian Nelson wrote:
>
> > Can't say I'm all that impressed with it though. The damn
> toolbar/ad
> > crap takes up half the damn screen. Maybe you're not missing out
> on
> > much...
>
> Actually, i
On Fri, 18 May 2001 20:12:57 Brian Nelson wrote:
> Can't say I'm all that impressed with it though. The damn
toolbar/ad
> crap takes up half the damn screen. Maybe you're not missing out
on
> much...
Actually, it's all configurable. Ya just got to play with
the settings. Personally after yo
On Fri, 18 May 2001 17:14:44 MaD dUCK wrote:
> trying to install opera, i got dependency errors, which even
apt-get
> -f install couldn't fix. subsequently i isolated the dependency,
and
> one of those were liblcms. but an apt-get install liblcms yielded:
>
> Package liblcms has no available ver
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 07:03:42PM -0500, Stephen E. Hargrove wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 06:14:44PM -0400, MaD dUCK wrote:
> > trying to install opera, i got dependency errors, which even apt-get
> > -f install couldn't fix. subsequently i isolated the dependency, and
> > one
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 06:14:44PM -0400, MaD dUCK wrote:
> trying to install opera, i got dependency errors, which even apt-get
> -f install couldn't fix. subsequently i isolated the dependency, and
> one of those were liblcms. but an apt-get install liblcms yielded:
>
> Package liblcms has no av
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 06:14:44PM -0400, MaD dUCK wrote:
> trying to install opera, i got dependency errors, which even apt-get
> -f install couldn't fix. subsequently i isolated the dependency, and
> one of those were liblcms. but an apt-get install
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
