On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 02:34:17PM +0200, Joe Hart wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Michael Pobega wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 07:14:02PM +0800, Tim Yang wrote:
> >> I agree it could be good for secuirity, but it was
> >> not implemented before.
> >> Every distri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul E Condon wrote:
[snip]
>> I suppose one should have some idea how to network administration before
>> setting up a network server in the first place, and it does help to read
>> the documentation.
>>
>> Joe
>
> I disagree about people who don't k
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 02:34:17PM +0200, Joe Hart wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Michael Pobega wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 07:14:02PM +0800, Tim Yang wrote:
> >> I agree it could be good for secuirity, but it was
> >> not implemented before.
> >> Every distri
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 07:07:21 -0400
Michael Pobega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> I mean, how many people use SSH servers on a daily basis (I bet loads
> do, but I'd assume most don't). And how many people actually run a
> server on their local computer (Besides Apache, which I'm sure almost
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Pobega wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 07:14:02PM +0800, Tim Yang wrote:
>> I agree it could be good for secuirity, but it was
>> not implemented before.
>> Every distribution I used such as Fedora, SUSE,
>> and even sarge installed ssh server
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 07:14:02PM +0800, Tim Yang wrote:
> I agree it could be good for secuirity, but it was
> not implemented before.
> Every distribution I used such as Fedora, SUSE,
> and even sarge installed ssh server
> by default and people using the service never have
> to think about how
I agree it could be good for secuirity, but it was
not implemented before.
Every distribution I used such as Fedora, SUSE,
and even sarge installed ssh server
by default and people using the service never have
to think about how to do when the service vanished.
Now it is changed so there might be
One thing I could not straight out is which task can
actually install the openssh server? If the openssh server
can not be installed by standard task selection,
then this could be listed as a bug, since it would
be difficult for people who actually need this service
to find out what to do.
I did s
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 10:46:25AM +0800, Tim Yang wrote:
>
> However I found a little problem. Since it is a server, I
> try to connect from another box with SSH and it was
> refused. I found out the problem was that the SSH server
> was not installed. Only openssh client was installed,
> not the
Tim Yang:
>
> However I found a little problem. Since it is a server, I
> try to connect from another box with SSH and it was
> refused. I found out the problem was that the SSH server
> was not installed. Only openssh client was installed,
> not the server. I have to manually apt-get the openssh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 10:46:25AM +0800, Tim Yang wrote:
> I have done a fresh installation of etch RC2 release, in order
> to set up a server for home use one a x86 box which I
> constantly try out different distributions.
>
> I have selected a few
11 matches
Mail list logo
