On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 02:59:22PM +0100, Lukas Ruf wrote:
> my boss agreed to distribute some code and information I have written
> under the terms of the GNU GPL v2 and the respective documentation
> license. However, he requested me to install a system which allows me
> to keep track on who is
* Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-23 18:42]:
>
[ ..]
> performance - in which case you won't be using CGI - it's usually best
> to use whatever language you are most familiar with and find most
> maintainable.
>
Totally, I agree!
wbr,
Lukas
--
Lukas Ruf
http://www.rawip.org
Wanna know
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 06:29:19PM +0100, Lukas Ruf wrote:
> I already have a suite of C based CGI "scripts" that work perfect
> together. Since submitting the initial question, I programed exactly
> what you described and tested it. One question open to me is
> concurrency: does htpasswd handle
* Derrick 'dman' Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-23 18:22]:
> I don't know of any existing system, but it should be quite trivial to
> code yourself.
>
This depends. It's true for the simplest approach.
> For the simplest approach use a .htpasswd file to restrict access to
> the directory co
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 02:59:22PM +0100, Lukas Ruf wrote:
| This means, a person should be able to register herself by providing a
| least a valid email address to which an access code is sent to. This
| access code is then used to download the respective tar-files.
I don't know of any existing
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 04:29:59PM +0100, Lukas Ruf wrote:
> * Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-23 16:25]:
> >
> > It sounds like this is in line with the letter, if not the spirit of the
> > GPL. As long as you're willig to give the source to anyone who you give
> > the binary to, under the
Bob writes:
> I haven't studied GPL law, but I do have a feeling you can't do this.
He can. He can't require that they agree to any restrictions, but he can
ask for their email addresses.
> Besides everyone would be free to distribute the goods themselves, so
> it's impractical to say the least.
* Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-23 16:25]:
>
> It sounds like this is in line with the letter, if not the spirit of the
> GPL. As long as you're willig to give the source to anyone who you give
> the binary to, under the terms of the GPL, then you'll be fine.
>
The full bunch of source w
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 03:19:35PM +0100, Robert Ian Smit wrote:
> * Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [23-11-2002 15:04]:
> > my boss agreed to distribute some code and information I have written
> > under the terms of the GNU GPL v2 and the respective documentation
> > license. However, he requested
* Robert Ian Smit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-23 15:17]:
> Can't help with a technical solution. I haven't studied GPL law, but
> I do have a feeling you can't do this. Besides everyone would be
> free to distribute the goods themselves, so it's impractical to say
> the least.
>
We do not mind
* Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [23-11-2002 15:04]:
> my boss agreed to distribute some code and information I have written
> under the terms of the GNU GPL v2 and the respective documentation
> license. However, he requested me to install a system which allows me
> to keep track on who is request
11 matches
Mail list logo
