On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 02:51:10PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It looks like the system is still running, but any attempt to access the
> hard drive gets stuck in an uninteruptible sleep.
you might consider the following sysctl settings (if you want to
automatically reboot the system):
fi
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 02:35:25PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> my memory usage
> has steadily climbed despite having no users on the system,
perhaps htop memstat sysatat or similar things can help
smartmontools hdparm (and badblocks, later) for the HD
Also, how much (kernel) memory is used
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 05:55:36AM +0200, NN_il_Confusionario wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 11:23:48PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ free -b
> > total used free sharedbuffers cached
> > Mem:1061478400 311463936 750014464
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 05:55:36AM +0200, NN_il_Confusionario wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 11:23:48PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ free -b
> > total used free sharedbuffers cached
> > Mem:1061478400 311463936 750014464
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 11:23:48PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ free -b
> total used free sharedbuffers cached
> Mem:1061478400 311463936 750014464 0 100552704 105132032
> -/+ buffers/cache: 105779200 955699200
> Swap
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 06:48:28PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> Give us some hardware details. CPU and speed, ram size, swap size, any
> errors in /var/log/syslog?
>
> You may want to install the memtest86+ package and run it when you can
> spare the box for a while. The package installs a gr
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 02:23:44PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have recently installed debain Etch 40r3 on an older Intel desktop
> which was previously reliably running a 2,4 Kernel SuSE system.
>
> The installation went pretty smoothly, and the system is being manly
> used as a firewall
I would think so. It is quite a lightly loaded system:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ free -b
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem:1061478400 311463936 750014464 0 100552704 105132032
-/+ buffers/cache: 105779200 955699200
Swap:699138048
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 02:23:44PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> tuko kernel: Process kswapd0 (pid: 122, ti=dfa66000 task=dff98550
> task.ti=dfa66000)
Is the memory (ram + swap) sufficient ? A 2.6 kernel might need more
memory than a 2.4 kernel. The heavvier use of swap is needed, the easier
9 matches
Mail list logo
