On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 08:52, Alan Connor wrote:
> You have 3 spammers on the list, that I have been able to identify for
> sure.
>
> You can figure it out: They are the ones that spearheaded the opposition
> against CR.
>
> "No!" you say, in shock, "It couldn't be HIM?!"
>
> Oh yes it could. And
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 01:51:39 -0700
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What? The group's reputation preceeds it? Or you already know about
> the resident kooks there? Or just the name alone?
Furry + Something Positive a few weeks back about covers it. :)
--
Steve C. Lamb
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 10:52:40PM -0700, Alan Connor wrote:
>
> You have 3 spammers on the list, that I have been able to identify for
> sure.
>
> You can figure it out: They are the ones that spearheaded the opposition
> against CR.
>
> "No!" you say, in shock, "It couldn't be HIM?!"
>
> Oh y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 10:52:40PM -0700, Alan Connor wrote:
> "No!" you say, in shock, "It couldn't be HIM?!"
Alan, to be honest, I haven't seen anybody so far out since mhirtes on
alt.fan.furry. (Everybody else can get some amusement value out of
h
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 00:26:54 -0700
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alan, to be honest, I haven't seen anybody so far out since mhirtes on
> alt.fan.furry. (Everybody else can get some amusement value out of
> his posts on google)
Hell, all I need to know is someone was further out th
On Thu, 07 Aug 2003, Alan Connor wrote:
> You have 3 spammers on the list, that I have been able to identify for
> sure.
First of all, whoever wants to hit me with a cluebat for replying can -
I probably deserve it.
The debian-user mailing list does get spammed - I believe that you don't
have t
On 09 Aug 2003 00:51:30 +0300
Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 08:52, Alan Connor wrote:
> > You have 3 spammers on the list, that I have been able to identify for
> > sure.
> > You can figure it out: They are the ones that spearheaded the opposition
> > against CR.
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 10:52:40PM -0700, Alan Connor wrote:
|
| You have 3 spammers on the list, that I have been able to identify for
| sure.
Yeah right. Spammers don't subscribe to mailing lists like this one.
| You can figure it out: They are the ones that spearheaded the opposition
| again
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:35:34AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Hell, all I need to know is someone was further out than someone else on
> alt.fan.furry to get the giggles.
What? The group's reputation preceeds it? Or you already know about
the re
9 matches
Mail list logo