Re: Off-Topic Posts

2007-03-09 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Kent West wrote: Historically this list has been tolerant of off-topic threads, likely because such threads have tended to be short-lived. However, the off-topic posters (and I have been guilty myself) seem to have taken this to mean that this list is appropriate for any and all discussions b

Re: Off-Topic Posts

2007-03-08 Thread s. keeling
H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Kent West wrote: > > Historically this list has been tolerant of off-topic threads, likely > > because such threads have tended to be short-lived. > > any helpful comments other than "read the manual". Those lists were so > full of arrogant self-proclaimed Linux or

Re: Off-Topic Posts

2007-03-08 Thread Freddy Freeloader
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 14:03 -0500, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: > Kent West wrote: > > > Historically this list has been tolerant of off-topic threads, likely > > because such threads have tended to be short-lived. > > > > However, the off-topic posters (and I have been guilty myself) seem to > >

Re: Off-Topic Posts

2007-03-08 Thread Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
Kent West wrote: > Historically this list has been tolerant of off-topic threads, likely > because such threads have tended to be short-lived. > > However, the off-topic posters (and I have been guilty myself) seem to > have taken this to mean that this list is appropriate for any and all > discu

Re: Off-Topic Posts

2007-03-08 Thread steef
Liam O'Toole wrote: On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:19:50 +0100 steef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i like, within constraints, political discussions on this list. gave me sometimes something to think about and/or a good laugh. i hate one-liners. from what side they come: they are always beside the po

Re: Off-Topic Posts

2007-03-08 Thread Hal Vaughan
On Thursday 08 March 2007 09:18, Kent West wrote: > Historically this list has been tolerant of off-topic threads, likely > because such threads have tended to be short-lived. > > However, the off-topic posters (and I have been guilty myself) seem > to have taken this to mean that this list is appr

Re: Off-Topic Posts

2007-03-08 Thread H.S.
Kent West wrote: Historically this list has been tolerant of off-topic threads, likely because such threads have tended to be short-lived. One of the reasons I love this list. Most of the messages are on topic, off topic messages are tolerated and if they live for too long, polite requests ar

Re: Off-Topic Posts

2007-03-08 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 09:48:12AM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote: > On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 08:18 -0600, Kent West wrote: > > Historically this list has been tolerant of off-topic threads, likely > > because such threads have tended to be short-lived. [...] > > > > I would urge the off-topic posters to

Re: Off-Topic Posts

2007-03-08 Thread Liam O'Toole
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:19:50 +0100 steef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i like, within constraints, political discussions on this list. gave > me sometimes something to think about and/or a good laugh. i hate > one-liners. from what side they come: they are always beside the > point for lack of nua

Re: Off-Topic Posts

2007-03-08 Thread steef
Liam O'Toole wrote: On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 08:18:12 -0600 Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Historically this list has been tolerant of off-topic threads, likely because such threads have tended to be short-lived. However, the off-topic posters (and I have been guilty myself) seem to have

Re: Off-Topic Posts

2007-03-08 Thread Liam O'Toole
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 08:18:12 -0600 Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Historically this list has been tolerant of off-topic threads, likely > because such threads have tended to be short-lived. > > However, the off-topic posters (and I have been guilty myself) seem > to have taken this to me

Re: Off-Topic Posts

2007-03-08 Thread Greg Folkert
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 08:18 -0600, Kent West wrote: > Historically this list has been tolerant of off-topic threads, likely > because such threads have tended to be short-lived. > > However, the off-topic posters (and I have been guilty myself) seem to > have taken this to mean that this list is