On Wed 05 Aug 2015 at 19:51:58 +0100, Paul Lavender wrote:
> No, it doesn't. I get a number to choose from, but not the one I want. 2.6
What doesn't?
What are you referring to?
Yoy have broken a thread and given no context for your reply. You may
think you know what you mean. We do not.
--
T
No, it doesn't. I get a number to choose from, but not the one I want.
2.6 is there - I'm not sure why, 3.2 - was that the last Wheezy, and
3.16 which is the most recent Jessie, I think.
Unfortunately 3.16 doesn't work for me, there are problems in the SATA
drivers on my ITX atom board. I'm afra
On Wednesday 05 August 2015 19:24:19 Brian wrote:
> On Wed 05 Aug 2015 at 18:05:01 +0100, Paul Lavender wrote:
> > I'm using kernel 3.13.5-1-amd64, which was released on a a pre-release
> > Jessie. How can I find the headers? Obviously the world has moved on and
> > the linux-headers-amd64 no longe
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 06:05:01PM +0100, Paul Lavender wrote:
> I'm using kernel 3.13.5-1-amd64, which was released on a a
> pre-release Jessie. How can I find the headers? Obviously the world
> has moved on and the linux-headers-amd64 no longer has them.
>
Does `apt-cache search linux-headers`
On Wed 05 Aug 2015 at 18:05:01 +0100, Paul Lavender wrote:
> I'm using kernel 3.13.5-1-amd64, which was released on a a pre-release
> Jessie. How can I find the headers? Obviously the world has moved on and the
> linux-headers-amd64 no longer has them.
http://snapshot.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSC
Jeff Grossman wrote:
I just ran 'aptitude update' and noticed in Aptitude there is a
section called "Obsolete and Locally Created Packages". How come it
would list "linux-image-2.6.22-2-k7" as obsolete? Isn't that my
kernel? I am running Testing.
It is also listing:
g++-4.2
gcc-4.2
linux-
Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 07:54:15AM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
I'm running Sid.
What's the way to find out what packages are obsolete and what they
should be replaced with?
Your question is pretty vague. What do you mean by obsolete?
AFAIK if you remove etch and
On Sun, 27 May 2007 19:02:25 +0300
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrei Popescu) wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 07:54:15AM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm running Sid.
> > What's the way to find out what packages are obsolete and what they
> > should be replaced with?
>
> Your question
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 07:54:15AM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running Sid.
> What's the way to find out what packages are obsolete and what they
> should be replaced with?
Your question is pretty vague. What do you mean by obsolete?
AFAIK if you remove etch and lenny from sourc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hugo Vanwoerkom escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running Sid.
> What's the way to find out what packages are obsolete and what they
> should be replaced with?
# aptitude update
Updates de DB of package that repos have avaible.
# aptitude upgrade
Updates your
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I run debian testing and I was looking under the obsolete and locally created
>packages in aptitude, and it appears that a lot of packages I use have been
>obsoleted. These include kdebase, all the X packages, and a few others. So i
>went to the debian website, and chec
Hi,
same prob as mine
my solution was:
change the access method of dselect. The package-file of dselect
is not updated, this is done in the apt-folder.
--
> Von: Harry Henry Gebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Betreff: Re: Obsolete packages
&
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 06:20:01PM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
> > just upgraded my system from a mix of Test 1 and Test 3 to the full 2.2
> > release. Noticed that I now appear to have alot of "Obsolete/local
> > Optional packages" now showing in dselect. According to the docs the
> Perhaps you sh
> Hi,
>
> just upgraded my system from a mix of Test 1 and Test 3 to the full 2.2
> release. Noticed that I now appear to have alot of "Obsolete/local Optional
> packages" now showing in dselect. According to the docs the best way to get
> rid of this (as these packages are the current versio
> "Gary" == Gary Hennigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Gary> If you don't need them then it's generally safe to delete obsolete
Gary> packages. I have a couple that I keep around because there's no
Gary> replacement in potato. glimpse for example is obsoleted but there's
Gary> n
As far as I know obsolete means something as: old, not needed any more or
there are better packages to replace this one with.
You can remove them if you want to, as long as they don't give any
conflicts it won't matter if you leave them on.
Ron Rademaker
On Thu, 18 May 2000, A. Scott White wrote:
"A. Scott White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I recently upgraded to Potato and Linux 2.2.15
>
> Now, when I go into dselect->select several packages are listed as Obsolete.
> What, exactly, does this mean? Should I remove these packages?
If you don't need them then it's generally safe to delete
rich wrote:
>
> Is it OK to remove all of the packages that dselect calls "obsolete"
> after potato upgrade?
-
I would be careful about that. Some of your custom installed software
may need some of the so called "obsolete" package
Generally, yes. Just use dselect to do it. If it bitches about broken
dependencies, put it back.
Bryan
On 21-Jan-2000 rich wrote:
> Is it OK to remove all of the packages that dselect calls "obsolete"
> after potato upgrade?
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] <
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
