On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:36:51 +0100, Raf Czlonka writes:
> Or "ucarp". I guess "keepalived" has been mentioned already and since
> you're not running a cluster it might be an overkill.
Really good stuff! I didn't know them. Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:46:51 -0500, green writes:
> I have not used it, but you might want to look at the vrrpd package.
Interesting... I didn't know that. Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 03:46:51AM BST, green wrote:
> Volkan YAZICI wrote at 2011-10-27 12:16 -0500:
> > I have two servers A and B, where both knows the IP address of itself
> > and the other. Assume A goes down (that is, A is not reachable via
> > ping), then B temporarily takes the IP address o
Volkan YAZICI wrote at 2011-10-27 12:16 -0500:
> I have two servers A and B, where both knows the IP address of itself
> and the other. Assume A goes down (that is, A is not reachable via
> ping), then B temporarily takes the IP address of A via IP aliasing.
I have not used it, but you might want
You seem to be looking for fail safe redundancy, may be you would like
to check heartbeat, or running a small cluster with virtual servers in
it, with fail over.
Sincerely,
Carlos
El 27/10/11 15:16, Volkan YAZICI escribió:
Hi,
I have two servers A and B, where both knows
Nevermind. See "apt-file search ipwatchd".
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:16:43 +0300, Volkan YAZICI writes:
> I have two servers A and B, where both knows the IP address of itself
> and the other. Assume A goes down (that is, A is not reachable via
> ping), then B temporarily takes the IP address of A vi
6 matches
Mail list logo
