on Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 04:20:04PM -0500, David Raeker-Jordan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> How can I alias a bunch of addresses in Mutt so that only the alias name
> appears in the To: field?
>
> Example:
>
> alias Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,\
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,\
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,\
> <[E
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 11:00:35PM -0500, David Raeker-Jordan wrote:
> All of my entries in /etc/aliases associate one known user with one alias.
> What would one alias for many addresses look like?
like this--local users are listed by login (mailbox) name; remote
users are [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 09:16:36PM -0500, Walt Mankowski wrote:
| On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 07:09:58PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
| > What were you expecting? The only way you can suppress each recipient
| > from knowing who else is recieving something is using BCC...
|
| That's not true. Mailing
heya,
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 11:00:35PM -0500, David Raeker-Jordan wrote:
> All of my entries in /etc/aliases associate one known user with one alias.
> What would one alias for many addresses look like?
separate them with commas
hth
sean
msg24176/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signa
Walt Mankowski wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 07:09:58PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > What were you expecting? The only way you can suppress each recipient
> > from knowing who else is recieving something is using BCC...
>
> That's not true. Mailing list managers do it (I don't know the
> ad
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 08:49:47PM -0600, Pete Templin wrote:
> He was referring to MUAs, not MTAs. Sheesh.
True, but that's likely the sort of behavior he's seen elsewhere and
is trying to duplicate.
msg24161/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
He was referring to MUAs, not MTAs. Sheesh.
Pete Templin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Walt Mankowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 8:17 PM
To: debian-user
Subject: Re: OT Aliasing Multiple Addresses in Mutt
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 07:09:58PM
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 07:09:58PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> What were you expecting? The only way you can suppress each recipient
> from knowing who else is recieving something is using BCC...
That's not true. Mailing list managers do it (I don't know the
addresses of everyone subscribed to
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 05:14:58PM -0500, David Raeker-Jordan wrote:
> That is a good idea, and I will use it if I have to. It seems, however, that
> mutt would have a cleaner way to suppress the individual addresses in a list
> of addresses.
What were you expecting? The only way you can suppress
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 05:14:58PM -0500, David Raeker-Jordan wrote:
| sean finney wrote:
| > On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 04:20:04PM -0500, David Raeker-Jordan wrote:
| > > The alias Group shows up in my addressbook, but when I send mail to this
| > > group, every name appears in the To: field of each
sean finney wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 04:20:04PM -0500, David Raeker-Jordan wrote:
> > The alias Group shows up in my addressbook, but when I send mail to this
> > group, every name appears in the To: field of each email. How can I modify
> > the list so that only "Group" appears in the To:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 04:20:04PM -0500, David Raeker-Jordan wrote:
> The alias Group shows up in my addressbook, but when I send mail to this
> group, every name appears in the To: field of each email. How can I modify
> the list so that only "Group" appears in the To: field.
>
> Thank you.
how
12 matches
Mail list logo
