martin f krafft wrote:
> bollocks. and i can distinguish a punk rock recording on CD from 192kbps
> MP3s. yeah right. (i can actually tell 192kbps classical MP3s from CDs,
> not so at 224kbps anymore, and only beethoven, mahler, and verdi --
> which are the ones i know really well).
Just to be
also sprach Carel Fellinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.08.0421 +0100]:
> I'm sorry, didn't ment to be rude.
> (rereading I fail to spot my rudeness though, must be bedtime then,
> or my rusty knowledge of english)
"i don't care... it's ... we're discussion here!"
i think the "i don't care" and
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 01:03:47PM +1100, Sam Varghese wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 02:22:11AM +0100, Carel Fellinger wrote:
...
> > I don't care that it does data CDs or over-burning, it's audio cds we
> > are discussing here! For further rebutals see my reply to Martin.
>
> I merely pointed
Yes, how rude. One of the pleasures I get from mailing lists is other
people's informed opinions, even if they are somewhat "off-topic".
On Monday 07 January 2002 08:03 pm, Sam Varghese wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 02:22:11AM +0100, Carel Fellinger wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 06:42:15
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 02:22:11AM +0100, Carel Fellinger wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 06:42:15AM +1100, Sam Varghese wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 05:26:33AM +0100, Carel Fellinger wrote:
> ...
> > > More seriously, there is only one *good* audio copy program on Windows
> > > that I know
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 12:04:20AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Carel Fellinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.07.0526 +0100]:
> > Maybe because they are lamers who are used to crappy products and wont
> > notice that there speedy copied cd's are full of cracks and pops:)
>
> i've use
also sprach Carel Fellinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.08.0222 +0100]:
> I don't care that it does data CDs or over-burning, it's audio cds we
> are discussing here! For further rebutals see my reply to Martin.
it's very good at audio too. *very good*. and overburning is surely
nice...
--
mar
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 06:42:15AM +1100, Sam Varghese wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 05:26:33AM +0100, Carel Fellinger wrote:
...
> > More seriously, there is only one *good* audio copy program on Windows
> > that I know of, i.e. ExactAudioCopy, and that one takes its time to
> > grab an audio c
also sprach Carel Fellinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.07.0526 +0100]:
> Maybe because they are lamers who are used to crappy products and wont
> notice that there speedy copied cd's are full of cracks and pops:)
i've use nero for years and never had a single broken cd. truly
honestly... nero is
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 05:26:33AM +0100, Carel Fellinger wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 11:13:44PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > can someone tell me why there exists a plethora of cd cloners for
> > windoze, with which, given a moderately rapid audio-extracting CD reader,
> > you can literal
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 11:13:44PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> can someone tell me why there exists a plethora of cd cloners for
> windoze, with which, given a moderately rapid audio-extracting CD reader,
> you can literally make full use of a 16x CD writer and have a perfect
> copy of your aud
11 matches
Mail list logo
