Re: OT: mutt/nano spellchecking

2009-10-05 Thread Tony Baldwin
Chris Jones wrote: On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 08:39:36AM EDT, Tony Baldwin wrote: One of the things keeping me from using Mutt as my default mail client all the time is the lack of certain spell check features. That's got nothing to do with mutt. Spell-checking is a feature of the editor that

Re: OT: mutt/nano spellchecking

2009-10-05 Thread Siggy Brentrup
On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 08:39 -0400, Tony Baldwin wrote: > Hi, > One of the things keeping me from using Mutt as my default mail > client all the time is the lack of certain spell check features. > I wasn't aware at all, until today, that I could set up nano to > spell check, but now have it work

Re: OT: mutt/nano spellchecking

2009-10-05 Thread Chris Jones
On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 08:39:36AM EDT, Tony Baldwin wrote: > One of the things keeping me from using Mutt as my default mail client > all the time is the lack of certain spell check features. That's got nothing to do with mutt. Spell-checking is a feature of the editor that you told mutt to us

Re: OT: mutt/nano spellchecking

2009-10-04 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 08:39:36AM -0400, Tony Baldwin wrote: > Hi, > > One of the things keeping me from using Mutt as my default mail client > all the time is the lack of certain spell check features. You did not like "i" from mutt to use console spell checker? There is native method. Menu