On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 16:52:32 -0600, hanasaki wrote:
> The version in sarge crashed like crazy. I ended up downloading from
> openoffice.org and installing manually.
>
> Also, any chance of the OO debian packaging person provided a package
> without the pretty icons (just keep the straight OO d
The version in sarge crashed like crazy. I ended up downloading from
openoffice.org and installing manually.
Also, any chance of the OO debian packaging person provided a package
without the pretty icons (just keep the straight OO distribution)? KIS
Thanks
===
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 a
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 10:54:14AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 02:14:12PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Do you guys mean MDI (Multiple Document Interface) rather than MDA (Mail
> > Delivery Agent)? :)
>
> Slap me with a wet noodle... I didn't catch that through the entire
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 02:14:12PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> Do you guys mean MDI (Multiple Document Interface) rather than MDA (Mail
> Delivery Agent)? :)
Slap me with a wet noodle... I didn't catch that through the entire
thread.
--
Marc Wilson | Evil isn't all bad.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 10:51:17PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 05:18:54PM -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
> > Quite correct. The *appearance* is misleading, though. It should
> > look like an MDA application with no document loaded (gray
> > background) instead of like a text docu
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 05:18:54PM -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 09:51:18AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
>
> > Actually, this makes sense. What would you expect it to create, if all you
> > ran was the container application? A text document? A spreadsheet?
>
> Quite correct.
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 09:51:18AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
> Actually, this makes sense. What would you expect it to create, if all you
> ran was the container application? A text document? A spreadsheet?
Quite correct. The *appearance* is misleading, though. It should
look like an MDA app
Hi Uwe,
å æææ 28 åäæ 2003 23:21ïUwe Dippel åé:
> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 07:29:51 -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
> > However, the OOo in Testing appears to be broken. No toolbars appear,
> > and many menu choices don't actually work.
>
> This post is not too helpful, though: here it works well; yes, in test
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 23:21:09 +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 07:29:51 -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
>
>> However, the OOo in Testing appears to be broken. No toolbars appear, and
>> many menu choices don't actually work.
>
> This post is not too helpful, though: here it works well; yes
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 07:29:51 -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 06:47:08PM +0800, Stephen Liu wrote:
>
>> Shall I remove all of them;
>> /usr/bin/openoffice /etc/openoffice /usr/lib/openoffice /usr/share/
>> openoffice /usr/share/openoffice.org-debian-files /usr/share/man/man1/
>>
On Sat, 2003-12-27 at 17:45, Stephen Liu wrote:
> /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libvos3gcc3.so(_ZN3vos14OSignalHandler5raiseElPv
> +0x26)[0x40b403c0]
> /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libtl645li.so[0x409be120]
> /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libtl645li.so(_ZN6ResMgr4InitERK6String+0x24)
> [0x409be2fe]
> /u
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 12:32:01PM -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
> What happened was, the default appearance of the program changed at
> some point: if I open it (with either soffice or openoffice) with no
> document loaded, I get a blank document and no toolbars. However,
> once it's open, if I load a
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 11:21:09PM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> No problems, no complains. Other icons, but unfortunately not
> any better than the original ones from OpenOffice.
>
> But running ? No problems encountered yet.
I posted hoping to hear otherwise. (I used to be hair-trigger on bug
re
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 07:29:51 -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
> However, the OOo in Testing appears to be broken. No toolbars appear, and
> many menu choices don't actually work.
This post is not too helpful, though: here it works well; yes, in testing.
# dpkg -l | grep openoffice
ii openoffice.org 1.1
Hi Carl,
- snip -
> However, the OOo in Testing appears to be broken. No toolbars appear, and
> many menu choices don't actually work. I hadn't noticed because I haven't
> used OOo for weeks. (For most word processing I prefer Abiword.)
I tried to install 'abiword' on my Debian box. Maybe I m
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 06:47:08PM +0800, Stephen Liu wrote:
> Shall I remove all of them;
> /usr/bin/openoffice /etc/openoffice /usr/lib/openoffice /usr/share/
> openoffice /usr/share/openoffice.org-debian-files /usr/share/man/man1/
> openoffice.
> manually? Download OOo again from Debian websit
Hi Carl,
Thanks for your response.
å æææ 28 åäæ 2003 02:23ïCarl Fink åé:
> On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 12:45:44AM +0800, Stephen Liu wrote:
> > Starting configuration import into user data ..
> > .. importing layer file:///tmp/oooLocale.zERG8I - succeeded
> > Application Errorsh: line 1: crash_re
Hi Xavier,
Thanks for your advice
- snip -
> Did you try a strace on OpenOffice ?
> For example, here is how to track which files are opened by bzflag:
>| strace -e trace=file /usr/games/bzflag
$ strace -e trace=file /usr/bin/openoffice > /tmp/OO-strace
The screen of Konsole window was runnin
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 12:45:44AM +0800, Stephen Liu wrote:
> Starting configuration import into user data ..
> .. importing layer file:///tmp/oooLocale.zERG8I - succeeded
> Application Errorsh: line 1: crash_report: command not found
Pure speculation, but if a command isn't found, it's gen
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 27 Dec 2003, Stephen Liu<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake:
> Hi folks,
Yo,
> OO1.1 failed to start.
k.
> On KDE desktop
> KStart -> OO 1.1.0 -> OO write
> It started and finally died.
>
> On Konsole window
> $ openoffice
> Starting configuration import into
20 matches
Mail list logo
