On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:12:58 +0200
Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Rene,
>
> I have never installed OOo on an ARM machine, but do you know, HOW much
> Memory I must have to run it? I have a Atmel AT91SAM9G20 (400 MHz) with
> 256 MByte SDRAM and 2x 512 MByte NAND Flash and a Fre
Hi Rene,
I have never installed OOo on an ARM machine, but do you know, HOW much
Memory I must have to run it? I have a Atmel AT91SAM9G20 (400 MHz) with
256 MByte SDRAM and 2x 512 MByte NAND Flash and a Freescale i.MX31 (532
MHz) with 512 MByte mobile SDRAM and 512 MByte of NAND Flash.
Am 2008
Am 2008-10-18 17:30:52, schrieb Josep M.:
> Hello.
>
> Openoffice.org have .deb packages for debian, I have in etch and runs
> well.
But not version 3
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
24V Electronic Engineer
Tamay Dogan Network
Debia
Shalom Tzafrir,
Am 2008-10-18 18:16:59, schrieb Tzafrir Cohen:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 12:06:38PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> > You say that OOo3 is "Experimental 3.0.0-3", but evidence shows that the
> > ftp.debian.org experimental branch is still at 3.0.0~rc4-1.
>
> $ rmadison openoffice.
Am 2008-10-17 23:40:55, schrieb Jason C. Wells:
> Is it advisable to install non-Debian provided packages?
>
> For example .deb files are out for openoffice3 but they haven't made
> their way to lenny yet. It seems like the Sun provided .deb files
> aren't quite so slick with handling dependen
Ron Johnson wrote: b
>> And you won't be able to install it on pure lenny, needs one lib from
>> sid. The other one (liblucene2-java) can be omitted when you don't
>> install the metapackage (openoffice.org) or don't need search in the
>> help...
>>
>> At some time there will be a lenny-backport, t
On 10/21/08 05:53, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
Paul Cartwright wrote:
so on my Lenny system, if I run this command:
apt-get install -t experimental openoffice.org
will it overwrite my existing 2.4 installation, or will I have 2 OOs
available ?
think a bit... Same package names -> overwrites 2
On 10/21/08 03:57, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 12:06:38PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
You say that OOo3 is "Experimental 3.0.0-3", but evidence shows that the
ftp.debian.org experimental branch is still at 3.0.0~rc4-1.
$ rmadison openoffice.org
openof
Hi,
Paul Cartwright wrote:
> so on my Lenny system, if I run this command:
>
> apt-get install -t experimental openoffice.org
>
> will it overwrite my existing 2.4 installation, or will I have 2 OOs
> available ?
think a bit... Same package names -> overwrites 2.4.
And you won't be able to ins
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> $ rmadison -s experimental openoffice.org-core
I just tried that command and got the same results.. never heard of
rmadison before!!
> openoffice.org-core | 1:3.0.0-3 | experimental | amd64, i386, powerpc, sparc
>
> Grüße/Regards,
>
> René
> (the maintainer, and sorry
Hi,
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 12:06:38PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> > You say that OOo3 is "Experimental 3.0.0-3", but evidence shows that the
> > ftp.debian.org experimental branch is still at 3.0.0~rc4-1.
>
> $ rmadison openoffice.org
> openoffice.org | 1.1.3-9sarge8 |
Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Jason C. Wells wrote:
>>
>>> Is it advisable to install non-Debian provided packages?
>>> For example .deb files are out for openoffice3 but they haven't made
>>> their way to lenny yet. It seems like the Sun provided .deb files
>>> aren't quite so
Miles Fidelman wrote:
>>
> While I love apt for most things, I've installed lots of non-debian
> packages, using the basic configure; make; make install approach. For
> many packages, that's the only way to get the latest version. I've yet
> to get Sympa to work from its .deb, for example.
>
Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Jason C. Wells wrote:
>>
>>> Is it advisable to install non-Debian provided packages?
>>> For example .deb files are out for openoffice3 but they haven't made
>>> their way to lenny yet. It seems like the Sun provided .deb files
>>> aren't quite so
Paul Johnson wrote:
Jason C. Wells wrote:
Is it advisable to install non-Debian provided packages?
For example .deb files are out for openoffice3 but they haven't made
their way to lenny yet. It seems like the Sun provided .deb files
aren't quite so slick with handling dependencies. That or
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 12:06:38PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> You say that OOo3 is "Experimental 3.0.0-3", but evidence shows that the
> ftp.debian.org experimental branch is still at 3.0.0~rc4-1.
$ rmadison openoffice.org
openoffice.org | 1.1.3-9sarge8 | oldstable | source, all
openoffice.
On 10/18/08 11:59, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
But even after I just updated apt, I still get this:
# apt-get update
[yadda yadda]
$ apt-cache policy openoffice.org
openoffice.org:
Installed: 1:2.4.1-9
Candidate: 1:2.4.1-11
Version table:
1:3.0.0~rc4-1 0
On 10/18/08 11:38, Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 11:21:18AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 10/18/08 10:54, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 10/18/08 02:11, Osamu Aoki wrote:
[snip]
Experimental1:3.0.0-3
It looks like someone is uploading it to Experimental now.
Thanks!
But even after I j
Ron Johnson wrote:
> But even after I just updated apt, I still get this:
>
> # apt-get update
> [yadda yadda]
> $ apt-cache policy openoffice.org
> openoffice.org:
>Installed: 1:2.4.1-9
>Candidate: 1:2.4.1-11
>Version table:
> 1:3.0.0~rc4-1 0
>1 http://ftp.debian.org
Jason C. Wells wrote:
> Is it advisable to install non-Debian provided packages?
> For example .deb files are out for openoffice3 but they haven't made
> their way to lenny yet. It seems like the Sun provided .deb files
> aren't quite so slick with handling dependencies. That or I am
> missing so
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 11:21:18AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 10/18/08 10:54, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 10/18/08 02:11, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> Experimental1:3.0.0-3
>>>
>>> It looks like someone is uploading it to Experimental now.
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> But even after I just updated apt
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 11:21:18 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 10/18/08 10:54, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 10/18/08 02:11, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> Experimental1:3.0.0-3
>>>
>>> It looks like someone is uploading it to Experimental now.
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> But even after I just updated apt,
On 10/18/08 10:54, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 10/18/08 02:11, Osamu Aoki wrote:
[snip]
Experimental1:3.0.0-3
It looks like someone is uploading it to Experimental now.
Thanks!
But even after I just updated apt, I still get this:
# apt-get update
[yadda yadda]
$ apt-cache policy openoffice.o
On 10/18/08 02:11, Osamu Aoki wrote:
[snip]
Experimental1:3.0.0-3
It looks like someone is uploading it to Experimental now.
Thanks!
--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Help a man when he is in trouble and he will remember you when
he is in trouble again.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hello.
Openoffice.org have .deb packages for debian, I have in etch and runs
well.
Josep
El sáb, 18-10-2008 a las 16:11 +0900, Osamu Aoki escribió:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:40:55PM -0700, Jason C. Wells wrote:
> > Is it advisable to install non-Debian provided packages?
>
> Advisa
Jason C. Wells wrote:
> Is it advisable to install non-Debian provided packages?
> For example .deb files are out for openoffice3 but they haven't made
> their way to lenny yet. It seems like the Sun provided .deb files
> aren't quite so slick with handling dependencies. That or I am
> missing so
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:40:55PM -0700, Jason C. Wells wrote:
> Is it advisable to install non-Debian provided packages?
Advisable-- No
Will it work -- probably if you read their documentation for
requirement.
> For example .deb files are out for openoffice3 but they h
On Friday 17 October 2008 11:40:55 pm Jason C. Wells wrote:
> Is it advisable to install non-Debian provided packages?
>
> For example .deb files are out for openoffice3 but they haven't made
> their way to lenny yet. It seems like the Sun provided .deb files
> aren't quite so slick with handling
28 matches
Mail list logo
