On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 08:44:54PM -, Curt wrote:
> On 2022-11-14, wrote:
> >
> >> https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/-/issues/428
> >
> > Is there a non-javascript-ey way to look at those issues?
> >
>
>
> Mutt crashes with SIGSEGV when uid -variable is NULL in
> pgp_gpgme_extrace_keys().
>
On 2022-11-14, wrote:
>
>> https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/-/issues/428
>
> Is there a non-javascript-ey way to look at those issues?
>
Mutt crashes with SIGSEGV when uid -variable is NULL in
pgp_gpgme_extrace_keys().
Found in Mutt 2.0.5 (Debian 11 + 2.0.5-4.1+deb11u1).
Reproducible in:
2.1
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 05:46:25PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2022-11-14 11:39 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> > If anyone figures out a way to make mutt NOT segfault when reading this
> > type of email, I'd love to hear it.
>
> Upgrading to 2.2.8 or later should do the trick. I can confirm
7;d love to hear it.
No problem here on bullseye with mutt "Mutt/2.0.5 (2021-01-21)", but
that might be because I'm unconcerned about checking signatures, so
something might be uninstalled or unconfigured. Here's what I see
when Gökşin Akdeniz's second message is read:
--✄---
On 2022-11-14 11:39 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> If anyone figures out a way to make mutt NOT segfault when reading this
> type of email, I'd love to hear it.
Upgrading to 2.2.8 or later should do the trick. I can confirm that
mutt 2.2.9-1 in unstable no longer segfaults displaying the message
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 07:33:00PM +0300, Gökşin Akdeniz wrote:
>
>
> 14.11.2022 15:26 tarihinde Anssi Saari yazdı:
>
> >
> > So does mutt try to check the PGP signature in Gökşin's message and
> > crash due to that or some other issue?
> >
>
> I use Thunderbird for reading, composing,sending
14.11.2022 15:26 tarihinde Anssi Saari yazdı:
So does mutt try to check the PGP signature in Gökşin's message and
crash due to that or some other issue?
I use Thunderbird for reading, composing,sending e-mail and signing and
encrypting, decrypting e-mail messages.
Probably it is why mut
steve writes:
> Le 14-11-2022, à 08:58:02 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
>
>>On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 08:51:47AM +0100, Henning Follmann wrote:
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>> Mutt crashes trying to open this post (while opening gnupg).
>>> That's weird.
>>
>>Confirmed.
>
> Here too.
>
> mutt 2.2.7 (2022-08-
Henning Follmann wrote:
Mutt crashes trying to open this post (while opening gnupg).
That's weird.
When I save the message as attachment, and run gnupg over it, I get this
error message
| gpg: CRC error; 3B73F1 - DC33B7
| gpg: quoted printable character in armor - probably a buggy MTA has been
Le 14-11-2022, à 08:58:02 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 08:51:47AM +0100, Henning Follmann wrote:
[...]
Mutt crashes trying to open this post (while opening gnupg).
That's weird.
Confirmed.
Here too.
mutt 2.2.7 (2022-08-07)
Hi,
Thomas George wrote:
> I thought to skip this step and tried
> gpg --verify SHA515SUMS.sign.txt debian-11.5.0-amd64-netinst.iso
That's not the right way.
SHA515SUMS.sign verifies SHA515SUMS
SHA515SUMS verifies debian-11.5.0-amd64-netinst.iso
The latter step can be done by this command in the
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 08:51:47AM +0100, Henning Follmann wrote:
[...]
> Mutt crashes trying to open this post (while opening gnupg).
> That's weird.
Confirmed.
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 11:46:22PM +0300, Gökşin Akdeniz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 13.11.2022 22:14 tarihinde Thomas George yazdı:
> > I want to do a new verified instillation of a debian iso. I have the iso
> > and SHA512SUMS.sign.txt and SHHA512SUMS.txt and have tried
> >
> > gpg --verify SHA512SUMS.
On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 07:27:21PM -0500, Thomas George wrote:
> Still strugglng. command suggested returns new key but no user id - skipped
>
Please do not top post, especially not if answers were posted
properly in a chronological way.
here is what you should try:
gpg --keyserver keyring.debian
Still strugglng. command suggested returns new key but no user id - skipped
On 11/13/22 15:08, Darac Marjal wrote:
On 13/11/2022 19:14, Thomas George wrote:
I want to do a new verified instillation of a debian iso. I have the
iso and SHA512SUMS.sign.txt and SHHA512SUMS.txt and have tried
gpg
Still struggling command 3 below responds invalid option --key-server
On 11/13/22 15:46, Gökşin Akdeniz wrote:
Hello,
13.11.2022 22:14 tarihinde Thomas George yazdı:
I want to do a new verified instillation of a debian iso. I have the
iso and SHA512SUMS.sign.txt and SHHA512SUMS.txt and have tr
Hello,
13.11.2022 22:14 tarihinde Thomas George yazdı:
I want to do a new verified instillation of a debian iso. I have the iso
and SHA512SUMS.sign.txt and SHHA512SUMS.txt and have tried
gpg --verify SHA512SUMS.sign.txt SHA512SUMS.txt with the result No
Public Key
Debian public keys are l
On 13/11/2022 19:14, Thomas George wrote:
I want to do a new verified instillation of a debian iso. I have the
iso and SHA512SUMS.sign.txt and SHHA512SUMS.txt and have tried
gpg --verify SHA512SUMS.sign.txt SHA512SUMS.txt with the result No
Public Key
I thought to skip this step and tried
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017, Charles E. Blair wrote:
>When I type "apt-get upgrade" I get
> this message, and things stop:
>
> W: There is no public key available for the following key IDs:
> EF0F382A1A7B6500
>
>I hope there is a simple fix.
You can ignore the warning _in this specific instance_
19 matches
Mail list logo
