On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:33:47 -0400
Mike Viau wrote:
> And now its available on squeeze under the flashplugin-nonfree
> package:
>
> http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/flashplugin-nonfree
>
> Remember to remove your previous flashplugin .so file if you couldn't
> wait like me.
>
> Enjoy!
>
>
> On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:20:12 -0500
>
On Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:15:27 +0100 wrote:
I dont know, they are normally pretty quick, but if you cant wait,
purge any other flash plugins, and download the .so and drop it into
"/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins" and it should be picke
On Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:15:27 +0100 wrote:
I dont know, they are normally pretty quick, but if you cant wait,
purge any other flash plugins, and download the .so and drop it into
"/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins" and it should be picked up by pretty much
everything!
Yes, the 64-bit shared lib, c
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 16:06, Mike Viau wrote:
>> On Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:15:27 +0100 wrote:
>>
>> I dont know, they are normally pretty quick, but if you cant wait,
>> purge any other flash plugins, and download the .so and drop it into
>> "/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins" and it should be picked
> On Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:15:27 +0100 wrote:
>
> I dont know, they are normally pretty quick, but if you cant wait,
> purge any other flash plugins, and download the .so and drop it into
> "/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins" and it should be picked up by pretty much
> everything!
+1
And the .so f
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 09:24:53 -0400
"John A. Sullivan III" wrote:
> Any idea when it will make it into the multimedia repository? - John
>
I dont know, they are normally pretty quick, but if you cant wait,
purge any other flash plugins, and download the .so and drop it into
"/usr/lib/mozilla/plu
>
>
>> At least this new x64 flashplugin is more stable than the 32bit one
>> under nsplugins, thats all I ask of the stupid thing.
>>
>> Works fine with chrome v7-dev/ff3.6.9 both x64, still pegs a core or so
>> playing videos, sigh!
>>
> Any idea when it will make it into the multimedia
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 11:27 +0100, Angus Hedger wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 18:25:44 + (UTC)
> Camaleón wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > JFYI, Adobe released a "preview" of the Flash player plugin for 64
> > bits systems:
> >
> > http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/
> >
>
> At l
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 23:33, John W Foster wrote:
>
> Here is the clincher..I have compared the output of streaming 1080p video on
> this same machine running mixed squeeze/sid to the same box running
> windows 7 pro. the video quality seems to be exactly the same. I can not tell
> any differen
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 18:25:44 + (UTC)
Camaleón wrote:
> Hello,
>
> JFYI, Adobe released a "preview" of the Flash player plugin for 64
> bits systems:
>
> http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/
>
> Now let's see how long it takes to put the "vulnerable" flag on it
> again
> >:-)
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 18:25 +, Camaleón wrote:
> Hello,
>
> JFYI, Adobe released a "preview" of the Flash player plugin for 64 bits
> systems:
>
> http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/
>
> Now let's see how long it takes to put the "vulnerable" flag on it again
> >:-)
>
> Wel
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 18:25:44 +, Camaleón wrote:
> JFYI, Adobe released a "preview" of the Flash player plugin for 64 bits
> systems:
Thanks for the heads up, was waiting for it to happen for a while.
--
Tong (remove underscore(s) to reply)
http://xpt.sourceforge.net/techdocs/
http://xp
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 02/22/07 15:37, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 04:44:04PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Article I, Section 8.
The actual language in the constitution states that "The Congress shall
have the power to ...
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why does it matter to you, since you want to move to Canada?
Holy fucking flamebait Ron!
Don't think for one second that Canadians aren't affected by, or interested
in, American politics. We'd rather not be, but we have no choice, living
right next door to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/22/07 15:37, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 04:44:04PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>>> Article I, Section 8.
>>>
>>> The actual language in the constitution states that "The Congress shall
>>> have
Paul Johnson wrote:
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 04:44:04PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Article I, Section 8.
The actual language in the constitution states that "The Congress shall
have the power to ... promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts,
by securin
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 04:44:04PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>>
>> Article I, Section 8.
>>
>> The actual language in the constitution states that "The Congress shall
>> have the power to ... promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts,
>> by securing for limi
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 05:59:13PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:31:18AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> >>
> >> Well, how would you describe someone who is so eager to dispose of your
> >> country's founding rights just to make a buck?
> >
>
Paul Johnson wrote:
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:31:18AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
Well, how would you describe someone who is so eager to dispose of your
country's founding rights just to make a buck?
You seem confused. He was simply acting to *secure* the rights
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:31:18AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
>> Well, how would you describe someone who is so eager to dispose of your
>> country's founding rights just to make a buck?
>
> You seem confused. He was simply acting to *secure* the rights of
> corpor
David E. Fox wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 12:02:48 +0100
> Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It seems to me that Steve Jobs likes DRM very much, as long as it makes
>> it difficult for competitors to interoperate smoothly with iTunes and/or
>> the iPod. (I know that the end user has r
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 07:01:16PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Arguably, since corporations are legal *persons* but have a potentially
> indefinite lifespan, 125 years (or life + 50 years) *is* a limited time.
With all due respect, this is why I've stopped accepting
thoughts on copyrights o
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:29:16 -0600
Mike McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I want to see happen is removing the restrictions of
> making backup copies of my DVDs and prohibiting me from
> playing them outside of my own "region". To me, this is
IMO, we really caved into the less-than-free g
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 12:02:48 +0100
Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems to me that Steve Jobs likes DRM very much, as long as it makes
> it difficult for competitors to interoperate smoothly with iTunes and/or
> the iPod. (I know that the end user has relatively easy ways around
As
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 04:44:04PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>
> Article I, Section 8.
>
> The actual language in the constitution states that "The Congress shall
> have the power to ... promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts,
> by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventor
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:31:18AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> Well, how would you describe someone who is so eager to dispose of your
> country's founding rights just to make a buck?
>
Paul,
You seem confused. He was simply acting to *secure* the rights of
corporations. Don't forget that b
The actual language in the constitution states that "The Congress shall
have the power to ... promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts,
by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive
Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;"
Interestingly, I've read that
Mike McCarty wrote:
BTW, where in the Constitution of these USA does it state that Copyright
must be limited?
Well, this is getting WAY off topic, but...
Article I, Section 8.
The actual language in the constitution states that "The Congress shall
have the power to ... promote the Progress o
Paul Johnson wrote:
Well, how would you describe someone who is so eager to dispose of your
country's founding rights just to make a buck?
I don't wish a painful death on anyone.
BTW, where in the Constitution of these USA does it state that Copyright
must be limited?
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;mai
Stephen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 03:38:14PM -0800 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson
> wrote:
>
> [ ...]
>
>> Sonny Bono was a terrorist for arguing against limited copyright,
>> and for that, I'm glad his death was painful.
>
> Geezus that's pretty harsh Paul.
Well, how would you describe
On 2/8/07, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Baz wrote:
> Steve Jobs is promoting the idea of ending DRM. Read at
> http://blogs.marketwatch.com/bambi/2007/02/apples_jobs_has.html
I'll wait until he practices what he preaches and stops hocking DRM music
on
iTunes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 03:38:14PM -0800 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson wrote:
[ ...]
> Sonny Bono was a terrorist for arguing against limited copyright,
> and for that, I'm glad his death was painful.
Geezus that's pretty harsh Paul.
--
Regards
Stephen A.
Baz wrote:
> Steve Jobs is promoting the idea of ending DRM. Read at
> http://blogs.marketwatch.com/bambi/2007/02/apples_jobs_has.html
I'll wait until he practices what he preaches and stops hocking DRM music on
iTunes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
Mike McCarty wrote:
> If I buy a single copy of something, I should be able to protect my
> investment in that one copy by making a single backup.
> Law allows that, but then allows the manufacturer to
> prevent it.
Along those same lines, I'm sick of corporations arguing against the
constitution
Wackojacko wrote:
Maybe this has something to do with it
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/1fc40360-abe9-11db-a0ed-779e2340.html
Could be. OTOH, The entire population of Norway is less than
that of most of the larger cities in the USA. If France and
Germany join in, then maybe things will heat up.
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 08:27:13 -0800, Baz wrote:
> On 2/7/07, Florian Kulzer wrote:
[...]
> >It seems to me that Steve Jobs likes DRM very much, as long as it makes
> >it difficult for competitors to interoperate smoothly with iTunes and/or
> >the iPod. (I know that the end user has relatively
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 15:19 -0800, Baz wrote:
> Steve Jobs is promoting the idea of ending DRM. Read at
> http://blogs.marketwatch.com/bambi/2007/02/apples_jobs_has.html
I recommend reading Ed Felten's take on this,
http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/?p=1117
--
Cheers,
Sven Arvidsson
http://www.
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 08:27 -0800, Baz wrote:
> "I know that the end user has relatively easy ways around
> these restrictions"
>
> Care to expand on this? I posted an inquiry on this new list back in
> December regarding work-arounds for iTune/iPod-dependent music. The
> word, "easy" was nowhe
On 2/7/07, Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 18:53:01 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 03:19:17PM -0800, Baz wrote:
> > Steve Jobs is promoting the idea of ending DRM. Read at
> > http://blogs.marketwatch.com/bambi/2007/02/apples_jobs_ha
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 18:53:01 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 03:19:17PM -0800, Baz wrote:
Steve Jobs is promoting the idea of ending DRM. Read at
http://blogs.marketwatch.com/bambi/2007/02/apples_jobs_has.html
Here is the original essay:
ht
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 18:53:01 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 03:19:17PM -0800, Baz wrote:
> > Steve Jobs is promoting the idea of ending DRM. Read at
> > http://blogs.marketwatch.com/bambi/2007/02/apples_jobs_has.html
> >
> Here is the original essay:
>
> http://ww
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 03:19:17PM -0800, Baz wrote:
> Steve Jobs is promoting the idea of ending DRM. Read at
> http://blogs.marketwatch.com/bambi/2007/02/apples_jobs_has.html
>
Here is the original essay:
http://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughtsonmusic/
I'd say that "promote" is a bit of a stron
42 matches
Mail list logo
