Re: New Kernel: make-kpkg vs. make bzLilo

1999-10-22 Thread Matthew Gregan
On Wed, Oct 20, 1999 at 07:41:20PM -0400, Salman Ahmed wrote: > One other thing: are there any problems compiling 2.2.12 or 2.2.13 with gcc > 2.95.2 ?? I read today in the 2.2.13 kernel's release notes at > that gcc 2.95 should > not be used to c

Re: New Kernel: make-kpkg vs. make bzLilo

1999-10-21 Thread David Natkins
Salman Ahmed wrote: > > > "ekw" == eric k wolven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > ekw> Ingo: Get the "kernel package" (dselect or apt-get) & install > > ekw> unpack kernel-source. etc. > > ekw> make menuconfig or xconfig > > ekw> then: make-kpkg clean > > ekw> then: m

Re: New Kernel: make-kpkg vs. make bzLilo

1999-10-21 Thread Ethan Benson
On 20/10/99 Brad wrote: > Has anyone tried compiling the recent kernels (ie 2.2.10-12) with gcc 2.95 > or 2.95.2 ? Any problems ?? I've done it, no problems here. YMMV. with 2.2.12 you had to add -fno-scrict-aliasing to the Makefile CC arguments, I am told that 2.2.13 will detect gcc 2.95 an

Re: New Kernel: make-kpkg vs. make bzLilo

1999-10-21 Thread Brad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Salman Ahmed wrote: [[[SNIP quoted details of using make-kpkg]]] > > Some people have mentioned earlier making another target as well : modules > (or modules_install). Is that necessary ? Do you mean 'modules-image'? That's used if you hav

Re: New Kernel: make-kpkg vs. make bzLilo

1999-10-21 Thread eric k. wolven
Sal: The kernel pkg script makes the modules. The dpkg -i kernel-image (etc) installs the modules--and warns you to mv any old modules. No make_install_modules is necessary with the kpg script. I tried to install the 2.3.4 kernel from ftp.kernel.org. My system booted but fluttered, so I stuc

Re: New Kernel: make-kpkg vs. make bzLilo

1999-10-20 Thread eric k. wolven
Ingo: Get the "kernel package" (dselect or apt-get) & install unpack kernel-source. etc. make menuconfig or xconfig then: make-kpkg clean then: make kpkg --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image then: cd /usr/src then: dpkg -i kernel-image(etc).deb Everything will install. No muss, no fuss Got

Re: New Kernel: make-kpkg vs. make bzLilo

1999-10-20 Thread Tomasz Wegrzanowski
On Wed, Oct 20, 1999 at 01:12:00PM +0200, Ingo Reimann wrote: > Hi, > > can anybody tell me, what do do, if i don't want to do the complicated > debain way to install a new kernel? > > in former times (SuSE <=6.1 ) i got the sources, and did the > make menuconfig > make dep && make clean && make

Re: New Kernel: make-kpkg vs. make bzLilo

1999-10-20 Thread Ingo Reimann
On Wed, Oct 20, 1999 at 04:32:38PM +0300, Martin Fluch wrote: > On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Ingo Reimann wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > can anybody tell me, what do do, if i don't want to do the complicated > > debain way to install a new kernel? > > > > in former times (SuSE <=6.1 ) i got the sources, and d

Re: New Kernel: make-kpkg vs. make bzLilo

1999-10-20 Thread Martin Fluch
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Ingo Reimann wrote: > Hi, > > can anybody tell me, what do do, if i don't want to do the complicated > debain way to install a new kernel? > > in former times (SuSE <=6.1 ) i got the sources, and did the > make menuconfig > make dep && make clean && make bzLilo && make modu

Re: New Kernel: make-kpkg vs. make bzLilo

1999-10-20 Thread T.V.Gnanasekaran
Hi > make menuconfig > make dep && make clean && make bzLilo && make modules && make_modules_install It should be 'make bzImage' -gnana