On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Jonathan Barnes wrote:
>
> Thanks for the reply, I was wondering what a good way of subnetting my networks
> would be.. What would be be advisable for someone with a DMZ and a LAN, and
> another LAN inside the first LAN
"better" or "good way" will depend on who you ask
i
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Jonathan Barnes wrote:
> Matt Perry wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Jonathan Barnes wrote:
> >
> >
> >>eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:05:1C:13:5C:8D
> >> inet addr:10.1.1.1 Bcast:10.1.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> >> UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1
Jonathan Barnes wrote:
Alvin Oga wrote:
yup ... your mask 255.255.255.0 says use only the last octet ..
10.0.0.x is NOT in the same network as 10.1.1.x
it's doing what you told it ... maybe not what you want
if you want to use 10.0.0.2 ... don't... "0" is best used for network
name
use 10.1.
Alvin Oga wrote:
yup ... your mask 255.255.255.0 says use only the last octet ..
10.0.0.x is NOT in the same network as 10.1.1.x
it's doing what you told it ... maybe not what you want
if you want to use 10.0.0.2 ... don't... "0" is best used for network name
use 10.1.1.2 and your trouble
4 matches
Mail list logo