On Friday, February 01, 2019 10:27:05 AM Curt wrote:
> Maybe inconclusive. What's a gnome application, anyway?
I'd like to try to answer that:
* I would say that a GNOME application is one that is in some sense
supported by the GNOME (I guess GNU?) organization -- it is probably hosted
(i.e.
On 2019-02-01, Kenneth Parker wrote:
> --1724fb0580ce49f7
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 4:21 AM Joe wrote:
>
>
>> ... NM is a Gnome application. ...
>>
>
>
> That's funny: Last year, I installed Kubuntu (not Debian, but same Package
> Manager
On Fri 01 Feb 2019 at 00:19:09 (-0500), Kenneth Parker wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 4:21 AM Joe wrote:
>
>
> > ... NM is a Gnome application. ...
> >
>
>
> That's funny: Last year, I installed Kubuntu (not Debian, but same Package
> Manager) and, even though no Gnome, Network Manager was
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 4:21 AM Joe wrote:
> ... NM is a Gnome application. ...
>
That's funny: Last year, I installed Kubuntu (not Debian, but same Package
Manager) and, even though no Gnome, Network Manager was installed.
--
> Joe
>
Kenneth Parker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Also in reply to:
20190131092106.2a6b3...@jresid.jretrading.com
q2ugqc$4kcj$1...@blaine.gmane.org
20190131115051.3276c...@jresid.jretrading.com
On 2019-01-31 09:21 + "Joe" wrote:
>By 'removing' Cinnamon, do you mean that you uninstalled it?
>I
On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 10:57:42 +0100
deloptes wrote:
> Joe wrote:
>
> > NM is a Gnome application.
>
> Are you sure? IMO it is not a gnome only tool although it is
> developed by gnome
> https://developer.gnome.org/NetworkManager/stable/NetworkManager.html
>
That's what I mean. It was develop
Joe wrote:
> NM is a Gnome application.
Are you sure? IMO it is not a gnome only tool although it is developed by
gnome
https://developer.gnome.org/NetworkManager/stable/NetworkManager.html
Description-en: network management framework (daemon and userspace tools)
NetworkManager is a system netw
On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 07:21:10 +
"Harley A.W. Lorenzo" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> After digging around more, the service file isn't just the only thing
> gone, the entire package has been removed as well. Honestly, I have
> no idea what could have resulted i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
After digging around more, the service file isn't just the only thing gone,
the entire package has been removed as well. Honestly, I have no idea what could
have resulted in this package being removed suddenly given the only circumstance
that changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Thank you.
To my surprise, the service was masked. I unmasked it, and the service is
completely gone now. I'm going to write it back in and see if this fixes
the issue, but now I'm very curious why the service masked itself after
switching desktop e
On 1/31/2019 3:04 AM, Harley A.W. Lorenzo wrote:
> On a Debian testing laptop that I switched from Cinnamon to XFCE4 (without
> xfce4-goodies initially) rebooting into the new desktop environment caused
> all my network interfaces except from loopback to fail. The network manager
> doesn't appea
11 matches
Mail list logo