On Sun, 2012-06-10 at 10:44 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 22:55:58 +0200, ricccardo wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2012-06-09 at 20:34 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
> >> > Is there some operation should I do to check if all is really working
> >> > fine??
> >>
> >> Ah! It seems that backports
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 22:55:58 +0200, ricccardo wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-06-09 at 20:34 +, Camaleón wrote:
>> > Is there some operation should I do to check if all is really working
>> > fine??
>>
>> Ah! It seems that backports provides a "libnss3" package so the
>> conflict could had come by t
On 2012-06-10, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> ric@ricmbp:~$ dpkg -l | grep libnss
>> ii libnss3 2:3.13.4-3~bpo60+1 Network Security Service libraries
>> ii libnss3-1d 2:3.13.4-3~bpo60+1 Network Security Service libraries -
>> transitional package
>
> These packages do not come from the stable di
* ricccardo:
> ric@ricmbp:~$ dpkg -l | grep libnss
> ii libnss3 2:3.13.4-3~bpo60+1 Network Security Service libraries
> ii libnss3-1d 2:3.13.4-3~bpo60+1 Network Security Service libraries -
> transitional package
These packages do not come from the stable distribution. You're using
backpo
On Sat, 2012-06-09 at 20:34 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 22:02:09 +0200, ricccardo wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2012-06-09 at 09:51 +, Camaleón wrote:
> >> On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 22:13:41 +0200, ricccardo wrote:
> >>
> >> > I notice that the update manager propose to me to upgrade both
>
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 22:02:09 +0200, ricccardo wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-06-09 at 09:51 +, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 22:13:41 +0200, ricccardo wrote:
>>
>> > I notice that the update manager propose to me to upgrade both
>> > libnss3 and libnss3-1d. Under libnss3 I read:'Conflict with
On Sat, 2012-06-09 at 09:51 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 22:13:41 +0200, ricccardo wrote:
>
> > I notice that the update manager propose to me to upgrade both libnss3
> > and libnss3-1d. Under libnss3 I read:'Conflict with libnss3-1d'. So what
> > should I do?? Which of them should
On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 22:13:41 +0200, ricccardo wrote:
> I notice that the update manager propose to me to upgrade both libnss3
> and libnss3-1d. Under libnss3 I read:'Conflict with libnss3-1d'. So what
> should I do?? Which of them should I install??
Which Debian flavor? You can expect some glitch
On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 11:40:36 +0300
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
Hello Andrei,
> If you do get an error (my guess is you won't), then this list is here
> to assist you.
IMO, Riccardo was/is right to ask first, rather than just go ahead. In
this instance errors may well be non-catastrophic, but "better
On Jun 9, 2012 4:40 AM, "Andrei POPESCU" wrote:
>
> On Vi, 08 iun 12, 22:13:41, ricccardo wrote:
> > Hi to all,
> > I notice that the update manager propose to me to upgrade both libnss3
> > and libnss3-1d. Under libnss3 I read:'Conflict with libnss3-1d'. So what
> > should I do?? Which of them sh
On Vi, 08 iun 12, 22:13:41, ricccardo wrote:
> Hi to all,
> I notice that the update manager propose to me to upgrade both libnss3
> and libnss3-1d. Under libnss3 I read:'Conflict with libnss3-1d'. So what
> should I do?? Which of them should I install??
The point of having an update manager is t
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 09:13:41PM BST, ricccardo wrote:
> Hi to all,
> I notice that the update manager propose to me to upgrade both libnss3
> and libnss3-1d. Under libnss3 I read:'Conflict with libnss3-1d'. So what
> should I do?? Which of them should I install??
sudo aptitude safe-upgrade
BT
12 matches
Mail list logo
