On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:59:23 +0300, David wrote in message
<201204102159.23240.d_ba...@012.net.il>:
> It is time that KDE (and Gnome) background services ran nicely niced
> out of the way but this is still, after all this time, not the case.
..leaving nepomuk alone, IME it stalled my boxes, look
It is time that KDE (and Gnome) background services ran nicely niced out of
the way but this is still, after all this time, not the case.
I have long disabled Nepomuk and use Recoll instead. Indexing daemon (option)
runs niced and one does not know it is running. It simply works.
I have a runne
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:17:44 +0200, Wojtek Zabolotny wrote:
> A few months ago, my 4-core Dell Vostro 3750 running debian/testing
> started to be awfully slow. I discovered, that this is caused by
> "nepomuk-services" in KDE and spent some time to disable them for all
> users (as there was no opti
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 05:17, Wojtek Zabolotny
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A few months ago, my 4-core Dell Vostro 3750 running debian/testing started
> to be awfully slow. I discovered, that this is caused by "nepomuk-services"
> in KDE and spent some time to disable them for all users (as there was no
> o
On 10.04.2012 14:17, Wojtek Zabolotny wrote:
Hi,
A few months ago, my 4-core Dell Vostro 3750 running debian/testing started to be awfully slow. I discovered, that this is caused by "nepomuk-services" in KDE and spent some time to disable them for
all users (as there was no option to disable it
On 24/02/12 20:00, baldyeti wrote:
Not in my version of System Settings. No such thing as Advanced.
On this here mepis system (kde 4.5.3), "desktop search" is under
"workspace appearance & behaviour"
K->Settings->System Settings->Desktop Search
Switched Nepomuk off. At last. Many thanks fo
Not in my version of System Settings. No such thing as Advanced.
On this here mepis system (kde 4.5.3), "desktop search" is under
"workspace appearance & behaviour"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@l
On 23/02/12 02:40, Andrew Reid wrote:
I didn't ask for it and I don't want it. So why do we have to have it? It
hogs the CPU and has an enormous database. I certainly do not have enough
file to justify a 60Mb database.
Is it possible to stop it from working in KDE? And what about nepomuk?
I'd li
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:43:33 -0800 (PST), T wrote in message
<1329957813.30735.yahoomailclas...@web121901.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>:
> --- On Wed, 2/22/12, Shaun Jones wrote:
>
> > In the control panel you can turn it off I believe it was
> > in the advanced tab.
>
> Yes, one could try to do that b
> I didn't ask for it and I don't want it. So why do we have to have it? It
> hogs the CPU and has an enormous database. I certainly do not have enough
> file to justify a 60Mb database.
>
> Is it possible to stop it from working in KDE? And what about nepomuk?
> I'd like to stop that too. Do I ha
--- On Wed, 2/22/12, Shaun Jones wrote:
> In the control panel you can turn it off I believe it was
> in the advanced tab.
Yes, one could try to do that but in my case that POS is still running. I tried
to kill it (and I thought I did) but it just won't die! :(
# ps -A u | grep -i Nepomuk
lus
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Sian Mountbatten
wrote:
> I didn't ask for it and I don't want it. So why do we have to have it? It
> hogs the CPU and has an enormous database. I certainly do not have enough
> file to justify a 60Mb database.
>
> Is it possible to stop it from working in KDE? And
AG wrote:
> On 21/05/10 12:37, Γιώργος Πάλλας wrote:
>> Hello to all!
>> I just upgraded my debian testing, installing nepomuk search. My
>> problem is that the indexer every now and then appears in the systray
>> for a second or so, and then disappears, which is very distracting
>> (or am I very s
On 21/05/10 12:37, Γιώργος Πάλλας wrote:
Hello to all!
I just upgraded my debian testing, installing nepomuk search. My
problem is that the indexer every now and then appears in the systray
for a second or so, and then disappears, which is very distracting (or
am I very sensitive? :-) )... Any
On 20/05/10 12:19, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Le 20/05/2010 10:12, AG wrote:
Hi all
Although I am logging into Gnome DE on an up-to-date Squeeze system, I
receive a message at login that declares Nepomuk requires virtuoso
soprano to work. Having looked nepomuk up via Google, it seems like
On Thu, 20 May 2010 12:40:01 +0200, Schelstraete Bart
wrote:
Also, is it just me or do other folk here also find that KDE seems to be
pulling in loads of dependencies ... databases, nepomuk (which wants
virtuoso soprano), etc. just to operate? Seems like a lot of overhead is
required to prop
Le 20/05/2010 10:12, AG wrote:
Hi all
Although I am logging into Gnome DE on an up-to-date Squeeze system, I
receive a message at login that declares Nepomuk requires virtuoso
soprano to work. Having looked nepomuk up via Google, it seems like it
is something from our KDE friends, but using apt-
On 20/05/10 11:35, Schelstraete Bart wrote:
>Also, is it just me or do other folk here also find that KDE seems to be
>pulling in loads of dependencies ... databases, nepomuk (which wants
>virtuoso soprano), etc. just to operate? Seems like a lot of overhead is
>required to prop up KDE4.* these
>Also, is it just me or do other folk here also find that KDE seems to be
>pulling in loads of dependencies ... databases, nepomuk (which wants
>virtuoso soprano), etc. just to operate? Seems like a lot of overhead is
>required to prop up KDE4.* these days.
Who says that you need virtuos
19 matches
Mail list logo
