Re: Need help with resolution

1998-09-21 Thread Stephen J. Carpenter
On Mon, Sep 21, 1998 at 07:43:35AM -0500, Ken Archer wrote: > You are right. That SHOULD work, but I had already tried that and it didn't > solve the problem. From what I can see, it seems to be a problem with the > system only seeing 256k of videoram when it has 2 meg. I should normally be > ab

Re: Need help with resolution

1998-09-21 Thread M.C. Vernon
On Mon, 21 Sep 1998, Ken Archer wrote: > You are right. That SHOULD work, but I had already tried that and it didn't > solve the problem. From what I can see, it seems to be a problem with the > system only seeing 256k of videoram when it has 2 meg. I should normally be > able to toggle between

Re: Need help with resolution

1998-09-21 Thread Ken Archer
You are right. That SHOULD work, but I had already tried that and it didn't solve the problem. From what I can see, it seems to be a problem with the system only seeing 256k of videoram when it has 2 meg. I should normally be able to toggle between resolutions with Ctrl - Alt - "+", but it is lo

Re: Need help with resolution

1998-09-21 Thread Stephen J. Carpenter
On Sun, Sep 20, 1998 at 07:46:54PM -0500, Ken Archer wrote: > I currently have SuSE 5.2, Red Hat 5.1, Slackware 3.4 and Debian 2.0 on > seperate partitions on a 10 gig hd. As you can tell, I am constantly looking > for something better. From what I heard, I thought it might be Debian, but I > can

Re: Need help with resolution

1998-09-21 Thread Ole J. Tetlie
*-Ken Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | | I currently have SuSE 5.2, Red Hat 5.1, Slackware 3.4 and Debian 2.0 on | seperate partitions on a 10 gig hd. As you can tell, I am constantly looking | for something better. From what I heard, I thought it might be Debian, but I | can't even get the resolutio