Re: Nautilus barfs

2003-01-15 Thread Russell
Paul Johnson wrote: On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 08:46:19AM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote: Don't use Nautilus. It's a bloated piece of crap. What do you suggest as an alternative? apt-get install gnome-commander/testing Don't get the one from stable because the one in testing has much more

Re: Nautilus barfs

2003-01-13 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Paul Johnson said: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 08:46:19AM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > > Don't use Nautilus. It's a bloated piece of crap. > > What do you suggest as an alternative? It's what we have if we want to use GNOME2, unfortunately. This is apparentl

Re: Nautilus barfs

2003-01-13 Thread Sridhar M.A.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 06:43:19AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 08:46:19AM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > > Don't use Nautilus. It's a bloated piece of crap. > > What do you suggest as an alternative? > Have you tried rox? Regards, -- Sridhar M.A

Re: Nautilus barfs

2003-01-13 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On 13/01/03 Paul Johnson did speaketh: > What do you suggest as an alternative? What are your needs? I mostly use the shell. If I need some simple file browsing, I use either Emacs dired mode, or something simple like dfs or gentoo. Mike -- Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, GnuP

Re: Nautilus barfs

2003-01-13 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 08:46:19AM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > Don't use Nautilus. It's a bloated piece of crap. What do you suggest as an alternative? -- .''`. Baloo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian admin and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to

Re: Nautilus barfs

2003-01-13 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On 12/01/03 Paul Johnson did speaketh: > OK, after browsing between one and three levels deep from wherever I > start in the filesystem or from Start Here, Nautilus 2.0.8 shows > nothing, but accurately states the number of objects. Then when you > refresh or try to do anything other than close t