Re: Named Pipes

2003-08-17 Thread René Seindal
On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 03:57:28PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 11:16:04PM +0200, David Fokkema wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 06:24:09AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > I wanted to use a named pipe to provide random images. > > > Do you have a particu

Re: Named Pipes

2003-08-16 Thread moseley
On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 11:16:04PM +0200, David Fokkema wrote: > On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 06:24:09AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > I wanted to use a named pipe to provide random images. > Do you have a particular task in mind? If so, maybe someone knows of an > alternative way without de

Re: Named Pipes

2003-08-16 Thread David Fokkema
On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 06:24:09AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I wanted to use a named pipe to provide random images. I know I can use > a program in a loop writing to the pipe, but that means starting the > program initially (from say a init.d or xdm startup script) where it > sits bl

Re: Named Pipes

2003-08-16 Thread Pigeon
On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 06:24:09AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I wanted to use a named pipe to provide random images. I know I can use > a program in a loop writing to the pipe, but that means starting the > program initially (from say a init.d or xdm startup script) where it > sits block

Re: Named Pipes

2003-08-16 Thread Rob Weir
On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 06:24:09AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I wanted to use a named pipe to provide random images. I know I can use > a program in a loop writing to the pipe, but that means starting the > program initially (from say a init.d or xdm startup script) where it > sits bl