On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 04:20:08PM -0700, Scott Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 02:33:23PM -0500, Skylar Thompson wrote:
> [...]
> > BIND 9, unlike previous version, is actually quite stable and secure. I'd
> > recommend transitioning to that rather than to other DNS servers, because
> >
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 02:33:23PM -0500, Skylar Thompson wrote:
[...]
> BIND 9, unlike previous version, is actually quite stable and secure. I'd
> recommend transitioning to that rather than to other DNS servers, because
> (AFAIK) it is much more full-featured than any other OSS DNS server.
[...]
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 05:26:58AM -0700, Scott Robinson wrote:
> [This list is migthy verbose, so please respond both to the list and myself
> directly.]
>
> I'm about to transition the DNS server from one Debian stable machine to
> another. The current configuration is a chroot hack on top of th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 26 January 2002 12:52 am, Joe Wise wrote:
> I'm trying to get my box to resolve DNS. I thought that I had correctly
> configured the name server, but I guess not. Any help as to where the DNS
> should be stored?
>
> Joe
/etc/resolv.conf
On Sun, Nov 05, 2000 at 11:39:06AM -0800, Jay Kelly wrote:
> Im running bind and apache on the same box. I use to host my web but have
> moved it over to another hosting co. I have removed the entry in named.conf
> but when I try to open the url I stll am getting it from my apache server
> and not
On Thu, 7 Nov 1996, M. Filizzi wrote:
> I finaly got ppp working but now I can't get it to telnet anywhere except
> for the places in /etc/hosts file, I did set the DNS in the resolv.conf
> and well it still wouln't let me go to anywhere else... it wouln't let me
> view web pages other then the
6 matches
Mail list logo
