basti wrote:
> On 27.05.19 17:32, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> basti wrote:
>>
>>> also on a network card with 2 NIC's
>>
>>> srv-a nic ens2f0 ens2f0 srv-b
>>> ens2f1 ens2f1
>>
>>> Can I use a switch that only supoort static LAC to speedup my
>>> connection? For example tp-link TL
On 27.05.19 17:32, Sven Hartge wrote:
> basti wrote:
>
>> also on a network card with 2 NIC's
>
>> srv-a nic ens2f0 ens2f0 srv-b
>> ens2f1 ens2f1
>
>> Can I use a switch that only supoort static LAC to speedup my
>> connection? For example tp-link TL-SG108E ? Or must it supp
Sven Hartge wrote:
>> also on a network card with 2 NIC's
>
>> srv-a nic ens2f0 ens2f0 srv-b
>> ens2f1 ens2f1
>
>> Can I use a switch that only supoort static LAC to speedup my
>> connection? For example tp-link TL-SG108E ? Or must it support LACP?
>
> For this direct connection you s
basti wrote:
> I want to speedup my network connection beween srv-a and srv-b. There is
> only a 1:1 connection.
> I have try to use balance-alb and copy some files from a to b with only
> 112 MB/s with dd and netcat.
In the RHEL Network Guide [1] it says that LACP is supported only with
switch
basti wrote:
> also on a network card with 2 NIC's
> srv-a nic ens2f0 ens2f0 srv-b
> ens2f1 ens2f1
> Can I use a switch that only supoort static LAC to speedup my
> connection? For example tp-link TL-SG108E ? Or must it support LACP?
For this direct connection you should us
Reco wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 01:48:39PM +0200, basti wrote:
>> Can this mode be used in this setup?
> AFAIK standard linux bonding can only use Passive LACP in 802.3ad.
No, it does active LACP.
>> How must I configure the other side?
> That's means you have to use openvswitch on eith
also on a network card with 2 NIC's
srv-a nic ens2f0 ens2f0 srv-b
ens2f1 ens2f1
Can I use a switch that only supoort static LAC to speedup my
connection? For example tp-link TL-SG108E ? Or must it support LACP?
On 27.05.19 15:49, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Mon, May 27,
Hi.
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 04:36:10PM +0200, basti wrote:
> also on a network card with 2 NIC's
>
> srv-a nic ens2f0 ens2f0 srv-b
> ens2f1 ens2f1
>
> Can I use a switch that only supoort static LAC to speedup my
> connection? For example tp-link TL-SG108E ?
They inv
also on a network card with 2 NIC's
srv-a nic ens2f0 ens2f0 srv-b
ens2f1 ens2f1
Can I use a switch that only supoort static LAC to speedup my
connection? For example tp-link TL-SG108E ? Or must it support LACP?
On 27.05.19 15:49, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Mon, May 27, 2
Hi.
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 03:36:38PM +0200, basti wrote:
> Hello sven,
> hello reco,
>
> I want to speedup my network connection beween srv-a and srv-b. There is
> only a 1:1 connection.
Any bonding mode will utilize a single link in such case.
The 'catch 22' for active-active bonding
Hello sven,
hello reco,
I want to speedup my network connection beween srv-a and srv-b. There is
only a 1:1 connection.
I have try to use balance-alb and copy some files from a to b with only
112 MB/s with dd and netcat.
So Im not shure if balance-alb use both interfaces.
On 27.05.19 15:09, Reco
Hi.
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 01:48:39PM +0200, basti wrote:
> Can this mode be used in this setup?
AFAIK standard linux bonding can only use Passive LACP in 802.3ad.
> How must I configure the other side?
That's means you have to use openvswitch on either side as it can be
configured to
basti wrote:
> I have 2 Servers both of them has an dual port nic, I want to bond this
> and try to configure this in 802.3ad mode. There are no switch beween,
> and there is no crossover cable installed.
"and there is no crossover cable installed"?
Beside the point that Gigabit Ethernet does n
Do you have anything such as bonding or VLANs setup? It could be
possible that iftop is seeing the traffic twice eg. once on the VLAN
interface and once on the actual physical interface.
Just a guess though.
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Chris Davies wrote:
> Rob Owens wrote:
>> Hardware-wis
Rob Owens wrote:
> Hardware-wise, everything is gigabit except for the 100Mb NIC in the
> desktop machine.
Ah, ok. I wasn't sure if you /really/ meant that.
Cheers,
Chris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:04:15PM +, Chris Davies wrote:
> Rob Owens wrote:
> > I've got an onboard NIC, supposedly 100Mb.
> > [...]
> > I've got gigabit networking between the two computers
>
> So do you have 1Gb or 100Mb connectivity?
Hardware-wise, everything is gigabit except for the 10
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 04:34, Chris Davies wrote:
> Rob Owens wrote:
> > I've got an onboard NIC, supposedly 100Mb.
> > [...]
> > I've got gigabit networking between the two computers
>
> So do you have 1Gb or 100Mb connectivity?
> CHris
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@li
Rob Owens wrote:
> I've got an onboard NIC, supposedly 100Mb.
> [...]
> I've got gigabit networking between the two computers
So do you have 1Gb or 100Mb connectivity?
CHris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact list
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:03:49PM -0500, Allan Wind wrote:
> On 2012-01-25 09:39:40, Rob Owens wrote:
> > I've got an onboard NIC, supposedly 100Mb. I've been doing a dd over
> > ssh for the last hour, and iftop tells me that I'm transmitting at a
> > steady 186Mb, while receiving about 1.2Mb.
>
On 2012-01-25 09:39:40, Rob Owens wrote:
> I've got an onboard NIC, supposedly 100Mb. I've been doing a dd over
> ssh for the last hour, and iftop tells me that I'm transmitting at a
> steady 186Mb, while receiving about 1.2Mb.
Perhaps you have compression enabled for ssh?
/Allan
--
Allan Wind
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 09:39:40AM -0500, Rob Owens wrote:
> I've got an onboard NIC, supposedly 100Mb. I've been doing a dd over
> ssh for the last hour, and iftop tells me that I'm transmitting at a
> steady 186Mb, while receiving about 1.2Mb.
>
> I read up a bit on full duplex, and as I unders
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
bri...@aracnet.com put forth on 3/31/2010 10:06 PM:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:45:37 -0500
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Got this error message stream on a server today. Never seen this
before. Does this mean my NIC is going south? Or is something else
going on? I tried man
bri...@aracnet.com put forth on 3/31/2010 10:06 PM:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:45:37 -0500
> Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>> Got this error message stream on a server today. Never seen this
>> before. Does this mean my NIC is going south? Or is something else
>> going on? I tried manualy bringing the
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:45:37 -0500
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Got this error message stream on a server today. Never seen this
> before. Does this mean my NIC is going south? Or is something else
> going on? I tried manualy bringing the NIC back up but ifdown/up
> didn't fix the problem. Had to re
Thanks you. That has worked great for me.
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:16:59 -0400 (EDT), Roman Gelfand wrote:
>>
>> My server has two onboard nics. I am using etho. For the longest
>> time it was working no problem. Then it just lost networ
On Fri, Mar 26 at 10:55, Stephen Powell penned:
>
> First of all, when you say that you have "two onboard nics", I
> interpret that to mean that there are two network adapters built-in
> to the motherboard, as opposed to separate network adapters
> installed in a bus-slot. Is that what you mean?
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:55:17 -0400 (EDT), Stephen Powell wrote:
> It's quite common to see a motherboard with a built-in ethernet
> adapter, but I haven't seen any motherboards with *two* built-in
> ethernet adapters.
I have been informed in a private e-mail that two built-in nics
is not uncommon
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:16:59 -0400 (EDT), Roman Gelfand wrote:
>
> My server has two onboard nics. I am using etho. For the longest
> time it was working no problem. Then it just lost network
> connectivity.When running ifconfig I get RX packets:0.
>
> Would any one know a way to fix it?
Roman Gelfand put forth on 3/25/2010 10:16 PM:
> My server has two onboard nics. I am using etho. For the longest
> time it was working no problem. Then it just lost network
> connectivity.When running ifconfig I get RX packets:0.
>
> Would any one know a way to fix it? I had similar probl
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 08:58:20AM -0400, daniel arjona wrote:
> Hello Everybody:
>
> I am playing with Linux Debian 3.1 release 1 for first time. I have some
> problems with the network access. In fact I can not ping my gateway. I
> double checked the network setups using webmin and also using
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 21:51 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hi,
> my net inforce card always worked in promiscuous mode
> when the boot the system,always display the eth0 only worked with
> promiscuous mode, how can i change it,and if that influence on
> the eth0's work?
> thanks any advance
F
On (25/04/06 08:58), daniel arjona wrote:
> Hello Everybody:
>
> I am playing with Linux Debian 3.1 release 1 for first time. I have some
> problems with the network access. In fact I can not ping my gateway. I
> double checked the network setups using webmin and also using the X-Term
> screen
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 08:58 -0400, daniel arjona wrote:
> Hello Everybody:
>
> I am playing with Linux Debian 3.1 release 1 for first time. I have some
> problems with the network access. In fact I can not ping my gateway. I
> double checked the network setups using webmin and also using the X-
the enables look
okay, but I get "Adapter Failure indication"...the fun continues.
Regards,
Dave.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Dave Whelan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: December 21, 2005 3:34 P
your question about the
"enables" may be pertinent, can you set that through modprobe parameters?
just thinking aloud
A
Regards
Dave.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Dave Whelan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debia
TECTED]>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: December 20, 2005 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: NIC PnP
>
>
>Dave Whelan wrote:
>> I have the driver but cannot access the driver. The setup utility for the NIC
>> gives me:
>>
>> 3c5x9setup.c:v1.00 6/19/2000 Donald Becker ([EMA
3c509
and maybe check the logs after that.
A
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: December 19, 2005 11:57 AM
Subject: Re: NIC PnP
On 12/18/2005 08:00 PM, Dave Whelan wrote:
I can't get my 3c509 working for aliant
05 11:57 AM
Subject: Re: NIC PnP
>On 12/18/2005 08:00 PM, Dave Whelan wrote:
>> I can't get my 3c509 working for aliant dsl, does anyone know how I can check
>> whether PnP is enabled on this NIC?
>> Regards,
>> Dave Whelan.
>
>Dave,
>
>I have that card wor
Thanks Ralph, I've got the driver but no syslog info.
Dave.
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: December 19, 2005 11:57 AM
Subject: Re: NIC PnP
>On 12/18/2005 08:00 PM, Dave Whelan wrote:
>> I can't
On 12/18/2005 08:00 PM, Dave Whelan wrote:
> I can't get my 3c509 working for aliant dsl, does anyone know how I can check
> whether PnP is enabled on this NIC?
> Regards,
> Dave Whelan.
Dave,
I have that card working fine on a sarge box with kernel 2.4.27. From
the syslog:
> Dec 19 10:05:57 lo
lists.debian.org
Date: December 18, 2005 9:01 PM
Subject: Re: NIC PnP
>On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 09:04:39PM -0400, Dave Whelan wrote:
>> I can't get my 3c509 working for aliant dsl, does anyone know how I can check
>> whether PnP is enabled on this NIC?
>> Regards,
>> Da
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 09:04:39PM -0400, Dave Whelan wrote:
> I can't get my 3c509 working for aliant dsl, does anyone know how I can check
> whether PnP is enabled on this NIC?
> Regards,
> Dave Whelan.
>
If it really is a 3COM 3C509 - go and get the floppies which contain
the drivers under DOS.
I'm install on Debian Sarge kernel 2.6 and work fine. But, I don't
test with kernel 2.4.
[ ]s
2005/7/12, Andrej Perdih <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello again,
>
> does anyone know if NIC Marvell Yukon 88E8053 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet
> Controlle is supporded for Debian.
>
> If it is than how should
Clive Menzies wrote:
> Andrej Perdih wrote:
> > does anyone know if NIC Marvell Yukon 88E8053 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet
> > Controlle is supporded for Debian.
> >
> > If it is than how should i install the system, must I get additional
> > drivers or
> > enything else
>
> I think you may have to
Andrej Perdih a écrit :
Hello again,
does anyone know if NIC Marvell Yukon 88E8053 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet
Controlle is supporded for Debian.
If it is than how should i install the system, must I get additional drivers or
enything else
Thank you.
Andrej
http://www.
A recent kernel should have the driver. It is called sk98lin.
On 7/12/05, Clive Menzies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On (12/07/05 12:30), Andrej Perdih wrote:
> > Hello again,
> >
> > does anyone know if NIC Marvell Yukon 88E8053 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet
> > Controlle is supporded for Debian.
> >
>
On (12/07/05 12:30), Andrej Perdih wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> does anyone know if NIC Marvell Yukon 88E8053 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet
> Controlle is supporded for Debian.
>
> If it is than how should i install the system, must I get additional drivers
> or
> enything else
I think you may have to
On (12/07/05 01:03), Andrej Perdih wrote:
> Hi Clive!
>
> Firstly thank you for your replay.
>
> I aam shure but i have look up and i havefound these three things among
> network
> adapters. (not shure; is this NIC card ?) Otherewise please tell me where to
> find the information in windows XP ?
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 11:11:52 -0400
Phil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I got a brand new Dell laptop with a Broadcom BCM 943056 wireless
> card.
>
> I was told they (broadcom) put out a linux driver for it but then
> pulled it back. because I can't use it under linux, I'm stuck using
> windows m
Kaveh Gh wrote:
> I'm new in Debian. I have a D-link 530+ Network Interface
> Card(PCI). I have been working on Slackware and mandrake linuxes for
> several years but now I want to switch to debian! to test it! ;)
Welcome to Debian!
> Anyway, I have installed debian but it could not detect my LAN
Ian Melnick wrote:
What else can I try?
Try googling for "arp_filter hidden" and related things; there are a few
archived discussions that will come up, although I don't know whether
any of them will be useful.
Also, look through some of the other arp related options in the
Documentation/networ
> Take a look at arp_filter in
> /usr/src/linux/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt (assuming
> /usr/src/linux is your unpacked kernel source).
>
> Now, I've never come accross this problem myself, but does it seem
> plausible that the default behavior here is creating the problem for
> you
Ian Melnick wrote:
nic1: ipA, macA
nic2: ipB, macB
On the network attached to nic1 one you send an arp request:
"who-has ipA tell x.x.x.x"
where "ipA" is the ip you believe is assigned to nic1. nic1 does not
respond. nic2 responds with:
"ipA is-at macB".
Yes, this is what's happening.
Take a l
> nic1: ipA, macA
> nic2: ipB, macB
> On the network attached to nic1 one you send an arp request:
> "who-has ipA tell x.x.x.x"
> where "ipA" is the ip you believe is assigned to nic1. nic1 does not
> respond. nic2 responds with:
> "ipA is-at macB".
Yes, this is what's happening.
> At the t
Ian Melnick wrote:
The only problem was, external requests coming in weren't going anywhere.
There's some kind of switch at the "main office" that forwards requests
from the "external IP" to the "internal" one, which is what my first NIC
was set up for. When we used arping and other monitoring tool
On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 21:30, Mario Flores wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I just installed debian woody in a dell pc (400 Mhz, 128 megs, and a
> 3com NIC: 3c905B 100BaseTX). During the installation of debian, the
> installation of any network card module failed. All network
> configuration was wrong and k
> the loopback interface and to my surprise eth0 was working as well! I
> could not find which module the kernel is using for eth0 anywhere. Is it
> possible that it is not using any module? The output for lsmod is:
>
> Module Size Used by
> parport_pc 7276 1 (au
Hello
Mario Flores (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I just installed debian woody in a dell pc (400 Mhz, 128 megs, and a
> 3com NIC: 3c905B 100BaseTX). During the installation of debian, the
> installation of any network card module failed. All network
> configuration was wrong and kept getting the
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 12:29:35PM +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 11:24:34AM +0100, Peter Samek wrote:
> >
> > If you grep /var/log/dmesg (or any logfile with boot messages) for eth0
> > or eth1, you should be able to find out.
> >
> > Example from my machine:
> >
> > $ g
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 11:24:34AM +0100, Peter Samek wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 02:08:39AM +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The box is a bridging firewall, with a custom compiled kernel. I've
> > done this configuration loads of times, but not with these NICs.
> >
> [...]
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 02:08:39AM +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The box is a bridging firewall, with a custom compiled kernel. I've
> done this configuration loads of times, but not with these NICs.
>
[...]
> I'm ashamed to say that I don't know how to see which card is eth0. I'm
"Tom Kloppel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> First of all, im using a DECchip 21041 card, it is supposed to use the
> 'Tulip' module. I installed debian with the normal woddy
> kernel(2.2.20-idepci) and the network card worked just fine. Last night I
> compiled/installed/upgraded to the 2.4.18 ke
On 9 Jun 2003 "Tom Kloppel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, i gave that a shot, as far as i could tell dhcp is installed and the
> "/etc/network/interfaces" file is correct. allthough I am a "newb" so Ill
> attach that...
>
> When i tried the network restart it gave me:
>
> Reconfiguring network
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 02:38:43PM -0400, Tom Kloppel wrote:
>
> Jun 9 14:25:38 ingersoll dhclient-2.2.x: socket: Protocol not available -
> make sure CONFIG_PACKET and CONFIG_FILTER are defined in your kernel
> configuration!
> Jun 9 14:25:38 ingersoll dhclient-2.2.x: exiting.
>
> Do I do that?
s that in the little xconfig screen with all
the buttons?
Thanks again :-)
- Original Message -
From: "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tom Kloppel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: Nic Issues..
&g
First off insmod will only work if you compiled tulip
as a module, otherwise its always gonna be ready for
kernel to use if you compiled it into the kernel.
It sounds like youre using dhcp.. So things you
should check for is to make sure you have dhcpcd or
pump installed and runnin. Secondly, ma
Piero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A question about Nic cards and modules.
> This is the output of "ifconfig eth0":
>
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:05:5D:AA:3B:E0
>inet addr:192.168.0.3 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
>UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> A question about Nic cards and modules.
> This is the output of "ifconfig eth0":
>
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:05:5D:AA:3B:E0
>inet addr:192.168.0.3 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
>UP BROADCAST RUNNIN
* Mike Dresser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Cam Ellison wrote:
> > Is there a way I can force irq assignment on bootup?
>
> Change the IRQ settings in the bios.
>
I have tried that, using different assignments. All I get is one NIC
up, supposedly on the LAN, but there is in
Thanks, Mike. Yes, it does help. It's very strange -- cat /proc/pci
shows the SMBus, USB, both NICs, and one sound channel on IRQ 5. Go
figure.
I have tracked down the nForce driver(s), and will have a go at that.
It really looks as though Linux compatibility was an afterthought.
Maybe they ha
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Cam Ellison wrote:
> I have installed a new MB & CPU (ASUS A7N266-VM & Athlon XP1600), and
> among the problems is that both my NICs are assigned irq 5 (they used
> to be at 10 and 12 on the old board). Consequently I have no network.
>
> The /etc/interfaces man page makes
Cam Ellison said:
> I have installed a new MB & CPU (ASUS A7N266-VM & Athlon XP1600), and
> among the problems is that both my NICs are assigned irq 5 (they used to
> be at 10 and 12 on the old board). Consequently I have no network.
>
> The /etc/interfaces man page makes no mention of irq assi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30-Jun-2002 Mark Roach wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-06-30 at 10:48, Rodney D. Myers wrote:
>> I have one lingering problem with my new Debian install.
>>
>> I have most things "under" control, but the one things that is not
>> allowing me to connect to my
On Sun, 2002-06-30 at 10:48, Rodney D. Myers wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I have one lingering problem with my new Debian install.
>
> I have most things "under" control, but the one things that is not
> allowing me to connect to my internal network, nor the intern
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 01:36:39PM -0800, Paul E Condon wrote:
| I am Debian newbie. I have a LAN that was running and is now in need of
| reconstruction. On the LAN were two Linux boxes and two Macs. The Linux
| box that provided internet access via ppp has a Netgear fa311 NIC. This
| card is not
On Sun, 2001-12-02 at 15:36, Paul E Condon wrote:
> I am Debian newbie. I have a LAN that was running and is now in need of
> reconstruction. On the LAN were two Linux boxes and two Macs. The Linux
> box that provided internet access via ppp has a Netgear fa311 NIC. This
> card is not supported by
On Sunday 02 December 2001 01:36 pm, Paul E Condon wrote:
> I am Debian newbie. I have a LAN that was running and is now in need of
> reconstruction. On the LAN were two Linux boxes and two Macs. The Linux
> box that provided internet access via ppp has a Netgear fa311 NIC. This
> card is not suppo
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 10:51:15AM +0100, spear wrote:
> Hi there !
>
> It seems that the drivers delivered with the mainboard are "
> Slackware/Redhat " designed ... I found another one, a natsemi.c file, but i
> never had to manage anything like this : how should i proceed ? What do i
> need ins
On Sun, 11 Nov 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying to configure my 2 NIC PCI cards in my PC under Debian. I have
> an EtherExpress Pro/100, and a Network Everywhere NC100. I've tried what
I do know the original, beta version of the EtherExpress Pro/100 uses a
different chipset than the
Hello,
After building the modules are they loaded? If you type lsmod (as
root) do you see the right driver? As an example, I have a second nic
that I haven't yet figured out how to start automatically. So,
whenever I want to use it, I type 'modprobe natsemi' which loads the
module natsemi and p
On Thu, 2001-11-08 at 22:16, Jason Machacek wrote:
> Is it possible to configure a NIC card without recompiling the kernel?
Yes.
Run "modconf" to load in another network card module (run as root). To
configure a network card's settings see the directory /etc/network/ (in
particular /etc/network/i
Thus spake Nils-Erik Svangard:
> Hi!
> I have a Realtek NIC, this is the output of cat /dev/pci
> Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139 (rev 16).
> IRQ 10.
> Master Capable. Latency=32. Min Gnt=32.Max Lat=64.
> I/O at 0xcc00 [0xccff].
> Non-prefetc
Kevin Lee([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> Does anyone know if SmartLink 10/100TX Fast Ethernet Adapter (I
> think it's also Realtek RTL8139) is supported by Linux? If so, the
> name of the driver please.
>From the /usr/src/linux/Doc*/Configure.help (Kernel 2.4.9)
RealTek RTL-8139
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 12:02:43PM -0700, Josh Reynolds wrote:
| On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Kevin Lee wrote:
|
| > Does anyone know if SmartLink 10/100TX Fast Ethernet Adapter (I
| > think it's also Realtek RTL8139) is supported by Linux? If so,
| > the name of the driver please.
|
| the tulip driver s
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Kevin Lee wrote:
> Does anyone know if SmartLink 10/100TX Fast Ethernet Adapter (I think it's
> also Realtek RTL8139) is supported by Linux? If so, the name of the driver
> please.
>
>
>
>
> Kevin
>
the tulip driver should work
- Josh
Kevin Lee wrote:
Does anyone know if SmartLink 10/100TX Fast Ethernet Adapter (I think
it's also Realtek RTL8139) is supported by Linux? If so, the name of
the driver please.
Perhaps the rtl8139 module ;)
-b
--
Number of restrictions placed on "Alice in Wonderland" (public domain)
eB
Yes,
I have a realtek rtl-8139 working fine in my home network (It was made by
genius, if I remember well the name was smartlink 10/100TX, but I man not
sure).
The kernel module you'll need is 8139too.
Good luck,
Paulo
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 01:05:30PM -0700, Kevin Lee wrote:
> Does anyone know if SmartLink 10/100TX Fast Ethernet Adapter (I think it's
> also Realtek RTL8139) is supported by Linux? If so, the name of the driver
> please.
there actually is a driver literally called RTL8139 which might work.
a
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 01:15:36PM -0400, Trig Asderik, Account Executive wrote:
> looking to get NIC drivers to make my compaq 1850R proliant work with debian
> currently debian is installed but NIC cards arent working
>
> would you know of any nic drivers that can be installed into a proliant to
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001 18:15:36 "Trig Asderik, Account Executive" wrote:
> looking to get NIC drivers to make my compaq 1850R proliant work with
> debian
> currently debian is installed but NIC cards arent working
Try the T1 thunderlan (tlan) driver - compaq seemed to use this chipset in
a lot of th
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 08:59:43PM +0200, Sebastiaan wrote:
> I found an Ungermann-Bass NIC, but the information on the web is limited
> about these cards. Does anyone have experience with these kind of cards
> and knows a compatible driver and jumper settings?
Of course I do not know the answer.
I have installed the base system (10 or 11 disks, can't remember). It
boots up fine, and I do the Alt-F2, login as root and do a modprobe:
modprobe wd
modprobe wd io=0x280 irq=11 mem=0xcc000 mem_end=0xc
Both give:
wd.c: No wd80x3 card found (i/o = 0x280)
/lib/modules/2.2.18pre21-compact/ne
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 12:02:52PM -0700, Craig Jones wrote:
| I have an old 386 on which I am trying to do an FTP install of potato.
| The NIC inside is a Western Digital and seems to be functioning all right
| (I got linux going from one of those floppy distributions, set everything
| up and was
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 12:02:52PM -0700, Craig Jones wrote:
> I have an old 386 on which I am trying to do an FTP install of potato.
> The NIC inside is a Western Digital and seems to be functioning all right
> (I got linux going from one of those floppy distributions, set everything
> up and was
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 01:21:01PM -0700, user138 wrote:
> does the stock debian I386 binary come with a driver that works with the
> older dlink de-528 card?
> i've tried others but none seam to work, ...
> i also have a intel 21143 chip on the mother board but that also seems to be
> unsupporte
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 11:43:47AM -0600, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
> I concur, and add that if it just *happens* to be an Optiplex GX1, it's
> probably a 3Com 3c905B-TX. There is a Linux driver for that, 3c59x by
> name.
Optiplex GX100. According to one of the Dell discussion forums, it's
a 3c920,
"Brooks R. Robinson" wrote:
>
> > the kernel with the correct modules for the card. You should be able to
> > get the info you need from Dell, especially since they are now
> > supporting Linux on many of their systems. They may have a driver/module
>
> This seems to be your best idea. Your box
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 10:06:28AM -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
> > /proc/bus/pci is there and contains two files (00 and 01), but
> > they're binary data. The kernel is 2.2.12, which should support
> I'm not familiar with "devfs" at all, but are you using it, by chance ??
Nope. It's a 2.2.12 k
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 12:52:54PM -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
> > The NIC is likely a PCI device even when it's integrated
> > into the MB. So, try "cat /proc/pci" and look for an "ethernet
> > controller" line. It will probably give you the chipset it uses
> > which is usually a pretty good st
> the kernel with the correct modules for the card. You should be able to
> get the info you need from Dell, especially since they are now
> supporting Linux on many of their systems. They may have a driver/module
This seems to be your best idea. Your box should have a number on it that
you can p
1 - 100 of 183 matches
Mail list logo
