Re: NAT/MASQ in single NIC

2001-03-01 Thread Bram Dumolin
re, Osamu Aoki([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 12:42:23PM -0800: > Well .. I danno... Never done it. Just a thoght which may work. > > Seriously, PCI NIC costs only $20 these days. I have 2 NICs and MASQ > them to access Cable and LAN. It will act as good firewall too. If you only hav

Re: NAT/MASQ in single NIC

2001-02-28 Thread Osamu Aoki
Well .. I danno... Never done it. Just a thoght which may work. Seriously, PCI NIC costs only $20 these days. I have 2 NICs and MASQ them to access Cable and LAN. It will act as good firewall too. Osamu PS: One of your e-mail address bounced mail, I think. On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 11:23:25PM +

Re: NAT/MASQ in single NIC

2001-02-28 Thread Ker Ruben Ramos
have you tried it? On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 10:54:51AM -0300, Martin Marconcini wrote: > Yes it's possible. I can't recall the URI now but check www.linuxdoc.org and > the IP_MASQ FAQ. > > > Regards, > > M. > > -Original Message- > From: Ker Ruben Ramos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent:

Re: NAT/MASQ in single NIC

2001-02-28 Thread Ker Ruben Ramos
what i want to know is if it's possible, if then.. the question is HOW? On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 05:31:39AM -0500, Chun Kit Edwin Lau wrote: > Hi > > If you don't have a dial up ppp0, I assume you have things like DSL > or cable. And if that is the case, you better off with 2 NICs since the

Re: NAT/MASQ in single NIC

2001-02-28 Thread Ker Ruben Ramos
yeah.. you mean aliasing but I mean how to masq it On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 08:05:40PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote: > IPALIASING, I guess > > eth0:0 203.170.2.x > eth0:1 192.168.1.1 > > ... > On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 09:11:01PM +0800, Ker Ruben Ramos wrote: > > is it possible to do NAT/MASQ in single N

Re: NAT/MASQ in single NIC

2001-02-27 Thread Osamu Aoki
IPALIASING, I guess eth0:0 203.170.2.x eth0:1 192.168.1.1 ... On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 09:11:01PM +0800, Ker Ruben Ramos wrote: > is it possible to do NAT/MASQ in single NIC with two ip address? if yes, > then how? > > my comp has no dialup PPP > > IPs : 203.170.2.x and 192.168.1.1 > > and I w

Re: NAT/MASQ in single NIC

2001-02-27 Thread Chun Kit Edwin Lau
Hi If you don't have a dial up ppp0, I assume you have things like DSL or cable. And if that is the case, you better off with 2 NICs since the collisions between the network and the internet is so high that it makes it not worth it to have only sigle NIC. Edwin Lau On Tue, 27 Feb 2001

RE: NAT/MASQ in single NIC

2001-02-27 Thread Martin Marconcini
Yes it's possible. I can't recall the URI now but check www.linuxdoc.org and the IP_MASQ FAQ. Regards, M. -Original Message- From: Ker Ruben Ramos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 10:11 AM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: NAT/MASQ in single NIC is it