Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun Sep 09, 2007 at 14:33:08 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 05:26:56PM -0400, KS wrote:
>>> No. That was a statement in addition to my earlier post asking if an
>>> email client can also "report spam" just as we can do via the
Hi,
On Sun Sep 09, 2007 at 14:33:08 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 05:26:56PM -0400, KS wrote:
> >
> > No. That was a statement in addition to my earlier post asking if an
> > email client can also "report spam" just as we can do via the web
> > interface manually.
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 05:26:56PM -0400, KS wrote:
>
> No. That was a statement in addition to my earlier post asking if an
> email client can also "report spam" just as we can do via the web
> interface manually. If it was possible, my client (and possibly several
> others) could have already up
Raquel wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 15:35:41 -0400
> KS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> The only way I know to report spam is to click the "Report Spam"
>>> button on the web interface for list archives. Can that be done
>>> via Iceweasel(or other mail clients) interface so that users
>>> don't h
On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 15:35:41 -0400
KS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The only way I know to report spam is to click the "Report Spam"
> > button on the web interface for list archives. Can that be done
> > via Iceweasel(or other mail clients) interface so that users
> > don't have to go and f
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 03:35:41PM -0400, KS wrote:
> KS wrote:
> > Nigel Henry wrote:
> >>
> >> A serious question. How can the spa--ers post to the list, using any
> >> words
> >> they like, and yet when I complain to the list using the same words they
> >> do,
> >> I am blocked from posting
On Sunday 09 September 2007 20:57, Nigel Henry wrote:
> I've just complained twice about s-x spam that's turning up on the list,
> and neither of my posts are to be seen anywhere. Murphy seems to be
> moderating complaints from legitimate users of the list, but allowing
> "spa--ers" to do what they
KS wrote:
> Nigel Henry wrote:
>> On Sunday 09 September 2007 20:57, Nigel Henry wrote:
>>> I've just complained twice about s-x spam that's turning up on the list,
>>> and neither of my posts are to be seen anywhere. Murphy seems to be
>>> moderating complaints from legitimate users of the list, b
Nigel Henry wrote:
> On Sunday 09 September 2007 20:57, Nigel Henry wrote:
>> I've just complained twice about s-x spam that's turning up on the list,
>> and neither of my posts are to be seen anywhere. Murphy seems to be
>> moderating complaints from legitimate users of the list, but allowing
>> "
When I'm not working on Debian, I make special effects for a movie
studio. There are a lot of high-powered people like me working for
free here. All we are asking for is people to run our software and be
reasonably nice to us :-) .
Ian Jackson raises a valid point in that he is an unpaid volunteer
Warning: this is a flame. It's quite a long time since I've been
quite so angry and upset at something someone has mailed me.
Alan Eugene Davis writes ("My complaints"):
...
> What happened to me with dselect _really happened_.
What almost certainly happened to you was that you pressed `-' on th
11 matches
Mail list logo
