On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
> [...]
> I'd show you how I chained openbsd, but the partition in question is
> not mounted and I'm not logged in on an admin group user right now.
This is for booting openbsd from the grub installed by debian Linux. I
don't know how applicable i
On 8/20/14, Rusi Mody wrote:
>> Any suggestions as to what to do. I've looked at several web pages about
>> this and most seem out of date & I'm apprehensive about directly editing
>> the grub.cfg file as it says to NOT do that.
>> Thanks!
>> John
>
> My impression (from the grub mailing lists) i
On Wednesday, August 20, 2014 10:30:01 PM UTC+5:30, John Foster wrote:
> Any one using multiboot please reply. I have a system that is running
> several linux distros, each on its own hard drive. I have also got
> windows 7 pro and KfreeBSD on their own hard drives. I want to get the
> grub2 osp
> Rather than probing, I prefer to have grub pass the boot off to the
> installed distro's own boot loader by chaining. That way, each install
> can update it's own loader and be done with it.
Complete agreement. Of course, what really should happen is that Grub
itself should do (at boot) the pro
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:58 AM, John Foster wrote:
> Any one using multiboot please reply.
Hi.
> I have a system that is running
several == 3 or more?
> several linux distros,
> each on its own hard drive. I have also got windows 7
> pro and KfreeBSD on their own hard drives.
At least 5 phys
On 21/08/2014, John Foster wrote:
> Any one using multiboot please reply. I have a system that is running
> several linux distros, each on its own hard drive. I have also got
> windows 7 pro and KfreeBSD on their own hard drives. I want to get the
> grub2 osprobe to recognize the KfreeBSD disk as
On 20/08/14 12:58 PM, John Foster wrote:
Any one using multiboot please reply. I have a system that is running
several linux distros, each on its own hard drive. I have also got
windows 7 pro and KfreeBSD on their own hard drives. I want to get the
grub2 osprobe to recognize the KfreeBSD disk a
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: multiboot on usb?
From: Brian
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 12:40:51 +0100
Message-id: <20121003114051.GM22368@desktop>
In-reply-to:
References:
On Wed 03 Oct 2012 at 10:12:22 +0100, abdelkader belahcene wrote:
> I want to check differen
On Wed 03 Oct 2012 at 10:12:22 +0100, abdelkader belahcene wrote:
> I want to check different distros ( instead of using several pens), so
>
> I want to create on an usb pen a mutli boot system.
> I used unetbootin, it works fine but for only one system at time.
> on Windows there are some
On Mon, 14 May 2012 01:20:11 -0400, Long Wind wrote:
> Thank Camaleón!
> I decide I'll replace Mandrake 9.2 with etch and I have tested with etch
> etch can boot squeeze
Well, of course Etch -GRUB legacy- can boot Squeeze and Squeeze -GRUB2-
can also boot Mandrake, but if that's an acceptable so
Thank Camaleón!
I decide I'll replace Mandrake 9.2 with etch
and I have tested with etch
etch can boot squeeze
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/cab-gxzdb
On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 14:54 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 13 May 2012 09:01:21 -0400, Long Wind wrote:
>
> > On 5/13/12, Camaleón wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Wow... that's a very old Mandrake release (kernel 2.4.22), and from the
> >> above line, it seems that you are not using "chainloading" but d
On Sun, 13 May 2012 09:01:21 -0400, Long Wind wrote:
> On 5/13/12, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>>
>> Wow... that's a very old Mandrake release (kernel 2.4.22), and from the
>> above line, it seems that you are not using "chainloading" but directly
>> booting your old Mandrake from GRUB2. If yes, then it c
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 09:01:21AM -0400, Long Wind wrote:
> On 5/13/12, Camaleón wrote:
> >
> >
> > Wow... that's a very old Mandrake release (kernel 2.4.22), and from the
> > above line, it seems that you are not using "chainloading" but directly
> > booting your old Mandrake from GRUB2. If yes,
On 5/13/12, Camaleón wrote:
>
>
> Wow... that's a very old Mandrake release (kernel 2.4.22), and from the
> above line, it seems that you are not using "chainloading" but directly
> booting your old Mandrake from GRUB2. If yes, then it can be that you
> (well, not "you" but the os-prober) missed s
On Sat, 12 May 2012 20:05:44 -0400, Long Wind wrote:
> my hard disk looks like this:
>
> sda1: Win XP
> sda3: Mandrake 9.2
> sda4: lenny
And you were booting from lenny, right?
> now I install squeeze at sda4
> (lenny erased)
And GRUB2 comes to place.
> XP boots OK
> but Mandrake 9.2 can't bo
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Russell L. Harris wrote:
> * Tom H [110921 02:09]:
>> Given the grub version, it's your Wheezy install that's controlling
>> boot.
>
> Thank you for noticing this. My intent was to have stable (Squeeze)
> controlling boot, because of the vagaries of testing. But
* Tom H [110921 02:09]:
> Given the grub version, it's your Wheezy install that's controlling
> boot.
Thank you for noticing this. My intent was to have stable (Squeeze)
controlling boot, because of the vagaries of testing. But this
(Wheezy) may be better.
> Why did you run "grub-install"?
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Russell L. Harris
wrote:
>
> I installed Debian stable (Squeeze) and Debian testing (Wheezy) on a
> single drive (multi-boot), then I installed Ubuntu
> 10.04.3-desktop-i386. In addition to a partition for each OS, the
> drive has a /boot partition and a swap part
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:26 AM, wolf python london
wrote:
> On 3 May 2011 15:19, consul tores wrote:
>>
>> i have a Laptop with Squeeze, OpenBSD-amd64-4.9, and
>> Slackware64-13.37: and it is using grub2 as bootloader, (if i use
>> lilo, it works correctly, but i want to evade bios check) grub2
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:19 AM, consul tores wrote:
>
> i have a Laptop with Squeeze, OpenBSD-amd64-4.9, and
> Slackware64-13.37: and it is using grub2 as bootloader, (if i use
> lilo, it works correctly, but i want to evade bios check) grub2 can
> not recognize OpenBSD (what is not a problem), an
On 4 May 2011 10:33, consul tores wrote:
> 2011/5/3 wolf python london :
>> On 3 May 2011 15:19, consul tores wrote:
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> i have a Laptop with Squeeze, OpenBSD-amd64-4.9, and
>>> Slackware64-13.37: and it is using grub2 as bootloader, (if i use
>>> lilo, it works correctly, but i wan
2011/5/3 wolf python london :
> On 3 May 2011 15:19, consul tores wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> i have a Laptop with Squeeze, OpenBSD-amd64-4.9, and
>> Slackware64-13.37: and it is using grub2 as bootloader, (if i use
>> lilo, it works correctly, but i want to evade bios check) grub2 can
>> not recognize
On 3 May 2011 15:19, consul tores wrote:
> Hello
>
> i have a Laptop with Squeeze, OpenBSD-amd64-4.9, and
> Slackware64-13.37: and it is using grub2 as bootloader, (if i use
> lilo, it works correctly, but i want to evade bios check) grub2 can
> not recognize OpenBSD (what is not a problem), and i
On Tue, 03 May 2011 00:19:20 -0700, consul tores wrote:
> i have a Laptop with Squeeze, OpenBSD-amd64-4.9, and Slackware64-13.37:
> and it is using grub2 as bootloader, (if i use lilo, it works correctly,
> but i want to evade bios check) grub2 can not recognize OpenBSD (what is
> not a problem),
With LVM you could put anything on logical partitions which can be
created/increased/decreased/dropped as necessary.
You need a small separate boot partition, which can be shared between
both systems.
You might want to create a swap partition, which also is shared, maybe a
separate partiti
Loeghmon T. Nejad wrote:
I am learning Debian and I was wondering if it possible to install two
instances of Debian on the same machine. One as the production
workstation for the daily work, and the other for experimentation,
testing software, add/remove apps, etc. I can then boot into the
partit
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 09:02:13PM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 09:56:21AM -0500, "Loeghmon T. Nejad" <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> > I am learning Debian and I was wondering if it possible to install two
> > instances of Debian on the same machine. One as the
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 09:56:21AM -0500, "Loeghmon T. Nejad" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> I am learning Debian and I was wondering if it possible to install two
> instances of Debian on the same machine. One as the production
> workstation for the daily work, and the other for experime
Frank McCormick wrote:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 09:48:40 -0600
Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Loeghmon T. Nejad wrote:
I am learning Debian and I was wondering if it possible to install
two instances of Debian on the same machine. One as the production
workstation for the daily work, an
Frank McCormick wrote:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 09:48:40 -0600
Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Loeghmon T. Nejad wrote:
I am learning Debian and I was wondering if it possible to install
two instances of Debian on the same machine. One as the production
workstation for the daily work, an
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 09:48:40 -0600
Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Loeghmon T. Nejad wrote:
> > I am learning Debian and I was wondering if it possible to install
> > two instances of Debian on the same machine. One as the production
> > workstation for the daily work, and the other f
Loeghmon T. Nejad wrote:
I am learning Debian and I was wondering if it possible to install two
instances of Debian on the same machine. One as the production
workstation for the daily work, and the other for experimentation,
testing software, add/remove apps, etc. I can then boot into the
partit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 09:56:21AM -0500, Loeghmon T. Nejad wrote:
> I am learning Debian and I was wondering if it possible to install two
> instances of Debian on the same machine. One as the production
> workstation for the daily work, and the other
Loeghmon T. Nejad wrote:
I am learning Debian and I was wondering if it possible to install two
instances of Debian on the same machine. One as the production
workstation for the daily work, and the other for experimentation,
testing software, add/remove apps, etc. I can then boot into the
partit
hi ya tony
On Mon, 31 May 2004, Tony Middleton wrote:
> I have a machine that is similar with Windows 98 and two Linux systems.
nah... you have ONE linux syste... with 2 different kernel
( vmlinux(linux) vs vmlinux.old(oldlinux) )
>
> image = /vmlinuz
>label = Linux
>root=/d
I have a machine that is similar with Windows 98 and two Linux systems.
My lilo.conf is as below:
boot = /dev/hda1
compact
lba32
prompt
timeout=50
single-key
verbose = 2
bitmap=/usr/share/lilo/contrib/sarge.bmp
bmp-colors=1,,0,2,,0
bmp-table=120p,173p,1,15,17
bmp-timer=254p,432p,1,0,0
install=/b
Tony Bradley wrote:
I am currently using the SuSE 7.2 version of Linux, and am feel I am no
longer quite a newbie (but certainly no guru! ;) ) I would like to
experiment with the debian distribution, but still retain SuSE in case of
emergencies.
Could you please explain how to install two or more
Tony Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Could you please explain how to install two or more distributions
> alongside one another on the same system, so that I can choose between
> them using LILO.
Create a partition or two for Debian, then tell the Debian installer
to use them.
Then you'll n
39 matches
Mail list logo
