On 4/4/07, Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 12:47:51 -0500
"Dave Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/4/07, Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:28:32 -0400
> > Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > Anybody got a hin
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 12:47:51 -0500
"Dave Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/4/07, Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:28:32 -0400
> > Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > Anybody got a hint or even better, a solution (one that does
> >
On 4/4/07, Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:28:32 -0400
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Anybody got a hint or even better, a solution (one that does not
> > involve -- wait for Etch, etc...I know someone wants to say
> > that!) ???
>
> I do not kn
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:28:32 -0400
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Anybody got a hint or even better, a solution (one that does not
> > involve -- wait for Etch, etc...I know someone wants to say
> > that!) ???
>
> I do not know the solution for Sarge. I am using Etch an
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:03:41 -0500
"Dave Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes it is Sarge, but do you mean I won't be able to use Flash
> unless I upgrade to Etch? Maybe the world has moved on from Sarge
> and Flash 7??
I haven't been watching this thread, but I use Sarge w/Firefox a
Flash.
-
Yes it is Sarge, but do you mean I won't be able to use Flash unless I
upgrade to Etch? Maybe the world has moved on from Sarge and Flash 7??
On 4/4/07, Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 10:23 -0500, Dave Walker wrote:
> 7.0.25
Your version number, herein lies your p
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 10:23 -0500, Dave Walker wrote:
> 7.0.25
Your version number, herein lies your problem. I am assuming you are
using Sarge, correct?
If so, there are some methods to fix this, but your best bet is to
upgrade to Etch in a few days, after it is released.
--
greg, [EMAIL PROTEC
On 4/3/07, Nyizsnyik Ferenc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 15:16:40 -0400
Michael Pobega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 12:47:22PM -0500, Dave Walker wrote:
> > Running Mozilla/5.0 1.7.8-1sarge10(current
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 15:16:40 -0400
Michael Pobega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 12:47:22PM -0500, Dave Walker wrote:
> > Running Mozilla/5.0 1.7.8-1sarge10(current stable release).
> >
> > I am curious whether it is po
Dave Walker wrote:
Running Mozilla/5.0 1.7.8-1sarge10(current stable release).
I am curious whether it is possible to get some version of Flash to work?
---
Here is what I did t
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 12:47:22 -0500, Dave Walker wrote:
> Running Mozilla/5.0 1.7.8-1sarge10(current stable release).
>
> I am curious whether it is possible to get some version of Flash to work?
> -
Dave Walker wrote:
> Running Mozilla/5.0 1.7.8-1sarge10(current stable release).
>
[message snipped]
>
> Anybody got a hint or even better, a solution (one that does not
> involve -- wait for Etch, etc...I know someone wants to say that!) ???
I do not know the solution for Sarge. I am using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 12:47:22PM -0500, Dave Walker wrote:
> Running Mozilla/5.0 1.7.8-1sarge10(current stable release).
>
> I am curious whether it is possible to get some version of Flash to work?
> Here is what I did to this point:
>
> apt-
13 matches
Mail list logo
