> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Sherohman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:58 PM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: More accurate time feedback
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 09:06:29AM -0700, Andrew Agno wrote:
&
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 09:06:29AM -0700, Andrew Agno wrote:
> Dave Sherohman writes:
> > faster than a quicksort.) If you are required to use a small data
> > set, just perform more repetitions to get measurable data.
>
> This also allows you to obtain statistics like standard deviations and
Dave Sherohman writes:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 06:29:39PM -0500, Ian Patrick Thomas wrote:
> > to a nanosecond, using the system clock? I need to write a
> > program that needs to output the time it takes various sorting
> > algprithms to sort various numbers of integers. For smaller
> > num
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 06:29:39PM -0500, Ian Patrick Thomas wrote:
> Is there a way to get a more accurate time value, preferably to a
> nanosecond, using the system clock? I need to write a program that needs to
> output the time it takes various sorting algprithms to sort various numbers
>
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 06:29:39PM -0500, Ian Patrick Thomas wrote:
| Is there a way to get a more accurate time value, preferably to a
| nanosecond, using the system clock? I need to write a program that needs to
| output the time it takes various sorting algprithms to sort various numbers
|
5 matches
Mail list logo
