On Mon, 7 Jul 1997, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jul 1997, Paul Wade wrote:
>
> > > 8 Mb should be enough too.
> > I don't know about that. Like I said before apache runs ok on the 8mb
> > machine until I run some cgi/perl script. It was even worse when I had
> Well... Maybe it's that
On Mon, 7 Jul 1997, Paul Wade wrote:
> > 8 Mb should be enough too.
> I don't know about that. Like I said before apache runs ok on the 8mb
> machine until I run some cgi/perl script. It was even worse when I had
> slackware and then redhat on the machine. Even a 486DX2 was sluggish until
> I wen
On Mon, 7 Jul 1997, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jul 1997, Paul Wade wrote:
>
> > I would think that 16mb ram would be a minimum regardless of CPU.
>
> 8 Mb should be enough too.
I don't know about that. Like I said before apache runs ok on the 8mb
machine until I run some cgi/perl s
On Mon, 7 Jul 1997, Paul Wade wrote:
> I would think that 16mb ram would be a minimum regardless of CPU.
8 Mb should be enough too.
--
Nicolás Lichtmaier.-
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
On Mon, 7 Jul 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have offered to set up a web server for computer science students
> here at Western Kentucky University to practice their cgi and perhaps
> java skills on. The machine would never have to support more than
> about 5 simultaneous users, and usually w
I used a 386/33 with 8MB RAM as my web server for almost a year.
It was also running a busy mail server too. Something like that
can handle quite a bit of load, surprisingly. I wouldn't want
to run it with 4MB of RAM though.
Actually, if you are teaching CGI, it's probably a really good idea
to
6 matches
Mail list logo
