A good page about free database manage program:
http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?DataBase
I prefere PostgreSql to MySql, because is more free .
And in that page there is solutions to use Access databases in
Openoffice directly.
Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
On Friday 03 December 2004 04:00, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thursday 02 December 2004 3:14 pm, William Ballard wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 03:08:05PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > I was wondering the same thing as I was driving around today. Seems
> > > like (from firsthand experience) a
On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 20:31 -0300, Filipi Vianna wrote:
> I think someone, a long time ago have wrote a book
> titled Utopia, about a very good land where everething
> is perfect... Perhaps the people who lives there can
> write well enough to keep someone's data safe...
>
> > 1. well-written prog
I think someone, a long time ago have wrote a book
titled Utopia, about a very good land where everething
is perfect... Perhaps the people who lives there can
write well enough to keep someone's data safe...
1. well-written programs
Just kiding folks!
;-)
I was just tryng to say that the regular ba
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 22:56 -0500, William Ballard wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 09:47:42PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Thus, an Access replacement should do all those things, but w/o
> > being buggy. Certainly you could have figured that out
>
> Since my data is stored in XML, I can do ever
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 09:47:42PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Thus, an Access replacement should do all those things, but w/o
> being buggy. Certainly you could have figured that out
Since my data is stored in XML, I can do everything and more I can do
with Access queries and reports using xslt
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 19:00 -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thursday 02 December 2004 3:14 pm, William Ballard wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 03:08:05PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > I was wondering the same thing as I was driving around today. Seems
> > > like (from firsthand experience)
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 07:00:57PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> school district). That being said, they threw the kid that wrote Code
> Red in jail, let's do something about those Access bastards.
We were talking about Access clones, not Access. But Access does
relational integrity.
Funny stor
On Thursday 02 December 2004 3:14 pm, William Ballard wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 03:08:05PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > I was wondering the same thing as I was driving around today. Seems
> > like (from firsthand experience) a great way to lose a lot of data
if
> > the slightest thing
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 15:08 -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thursday 02 December 2004 11:13 am, André Carezia wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 19:24:45 -0500
> > William Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > The nice thing about Access is it doesn't require a server process
> to
> > > be runn
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 03:08:05PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> I was wondering the same thing as I was driving around today. Seems
> like (from firsthand experience) a great way to lose a lot of data if
> the slightest thing goes wrong...
You wouldn't use it for a 3-tiered or web app or anythi
On Thursday 02 December 2004 11:13 am, André Carezia wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 19:24:45 -0500
> William Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The nice thing about Access is it doesn't require a server process
to
> > be running but it uses SQL. [...]
>
> Just curious: in which ways is this
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 17:13 -0200, André Carezia wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 19:24:45 -0500
> William Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The nice thing about Access is it doesn't require a server process to
> > be running but it uses SQL. [...]
>
> Just curious: in which ways is this a goo
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 19:24:45 -0500
William Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The nice thing about Access is it doesn't require a server process to
> be running but it uses SQL. [...]
Just curious: in which ways is this a good thing?
--
André Carezia
Eng. de Telecomunicações
Carezia Consultor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, 01.12.2004 at 19:07 -0500, Shawn McCuan wrote:
> Is there a good Linux counterpart to MS Access?
I notice that the other replies are mainly geared towards suggesting a
'real' database (MySQL, PostgreSQL etc.), together with some kind of
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 07:07:32PM -0500, Shawn McCuan wrote:
> Is there a good Linux counterpart to MS Access?
>
>
> --
Hi Shawn,
Access is 3 products: a database server, database client and a database
frontend maker.
the more popular database server/clients are postgres and mysql.
I use mysql
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 19:07 -0500, Shawn McCuan wrote:
> Is there a good Linux counterpart to MS Access?
There are a lot of different bits of software that do some of the things
that access does. Some of them try to be a little more like Access than
others.
Rekall does not have a built-in databas
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 16:14 -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 December 2004 4:07 pm, Shawn McCuan wrote:
> > Is there a good Linux counterpart to MS Access?
>
> Yes, anything is better than Access, even Excel.
That is so bogus.
> Go check out mysql...
Why do you make such facile comm
I keep trying to move your replies back to the list, but you keep using
Reply to Author instead of Reply to Mailing List. Please familiarize
yourself with this feature.
On Wednesday 01 December 2004 4:23 pm, Shawn McCuan wrote:
> Well, me personally, I hated excel. lol. I'd rather use access,
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 04:14:06PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 December 2004 4:07 pm, Shawn McCuan wrote:
> > Is there a good Linux counterpart to MS Access?
>
> Yes, anything is better than Access, even Excel.
>
> Go check out mysql...
The nice thing about Access is it doesn't
On Wednesday 01 December 2004 4:07 pm, Shawn McCuan wrote:
> Is there a good Linux counterpart to MS Access?
Yes, anything is better than Access, even Excel.
Go check out mysql...
--
Paul Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ursine.dyndns.org/
pgpv1RgV0fpAa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Keith G. Murphy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, Im working ina medical group that uses Microsoft Access,
is there any software that can interact with Access?
If you're thinking about doing some lightweight work with Access from
Linux, and it's OK for it to be Perl-based, you might w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi all, Im working ina medical group that uses Microsoft Access,
>
> is there any software that can interact with Access?
>
If you're thinking about doing some lightweight work with Access from
Linux, and it's OK for it to be Perl-based, you might want to check out
D
On Sun Apr 14, 2002 at 10:25:13AM +0200, Karsten Heymann wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020414 10:14]:
> >
> > Hi all, Im working ina medical group that uses Microsoft Access,
> >
> > is there any software that can interact with Access?
>
> MySQL (backend)
>
> Just jokin',
>
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020414 10:14]:
>
> Hi all, Im working ina medical group that uses Microsoft Access,
>
> is there any software that can interact with Access?
MySQL (backend)
Just jokin',
Karsten
--
Karsten Heymann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CAU-University
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 04:17:57PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| Hi all, Im working ina medical group that uses Microsoft Access,
|
| is there any software that can interact with Access?
ODBC (probably). At any rate it isn't fun.
-D
--
Contrary to popular belief, Unix is user friendly
26 matches
Mail list logo
