On Sat, 12 Feb 2022 12:49:15 -0500
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > As I mentioned (briefly) in my original post, yes, I experience concrete
> > problems: the system either grinds to a halt or becomes unresponsive,
> > or hits swap and becomes intolerably slow.
>
> Sorry I missed that part.
> I think t
On 12/02/2022 12:43, Curt wrote:
On 2022-02-12, piorunz wrote:
On 11/02/2022 22:16, Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote:
Somewhere in their help or documentation they even say that you shouldn't leave
it running for extended periods of time.
Never heard such a thing. Do you have source?
See my o
On Sunday, February 13, 2022 02:58:46 PM Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote:
> On Saturday 12 February 2022 09:21:00 am rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > The version of Firefox used in Jessie (and presumably later versions)
> > creates (typically mutlitple) files named "Web Content". I don't know
> > how Fire
On Saturday 12 February 2022 09:21:00 am rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> The version of Firefox used in Jessie (and presumably later versions) creates
> (typically mutlitple) files named "Web Content". I don't know how Firefox
> decides what to put in each of those (e.g., content from how many tabs)
On Fri 11 Feb 2022 at 20:04:35 (+0100), Linux-Fan wrote:
> Stefan Monnier writes:
>
> > > I used to have 8 GB on the system, and it would start to thrash at
> > > about 7+ GB usage. I recently ugrade to 16 GB; memory usage is
> > > currently over 8 GB, and it seems to be slowly but steadily increa
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 10:05:27AM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, February 13, 2022 01:29:09 AM to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 09:21:00AM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
>
> I'm sure they are not one from each tab -- I often have 100 tabs open (in
> Jessi
On Du, 13 feb 22, 08:03:39, Tixy wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-02-13 at 07:30 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 11:45:05PM +0100, Felmon Davis wrote:
> > > On Sat, 12 Feb 2022, Curt wrote:
> > >
> > > > https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-uses-too-much-memory-or-cpu-resou
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 10:05:27AM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
[Firefox Web Content processes]
> > Those are, basically, one for each tab, yes.
>
> I'm sure they are not one from each tab -- I often have 100 tabs open (in
> Jessie's Firfox, upto 3000 in Wheezy's Firefox), and typically se
On Sunday, February 13, 2022 01:29:09 AM to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 09:21:00AM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > The version of Firefox used in Jessie (and presumably later versions)
> > creates (typically mutlitple) files
>
> ...you mean "processes", not fi
On Sun, 2022-02-13 at 07:30 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 11:45:05PM +0100, Felmon Davis wrote:
> > On Sat, 12 Feb 2022, Curt wrote:
> >
> > > https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-uses-too-much-memory-or-cpu-resources
> > >
> > > Firefox may use more system reso
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 11:45:05PM +0100, Felmon Davis wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Feb 2022, Curt wrote:
>
> > https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-uses-too-much-memory-or-cpu-resources
> >
> > Firefox may use more system resources if it's left open for long periods
> > of time [...]
> what this
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 09:21:00AM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
> The version of Firefox used in Jessie (and presumably later versions) creates
> (typically mutlitple) files
...you mean "processes", not files, right?
> named "Web Content". I don't know ho
On Sat, 12 Feb 2022, Curt wrote:
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-uses-too-much-memory-or-cpu-resources
Firefox may use more system resources if it's left open for long periods
of time. A workaround for this is to periodically restart Firefox. You
can configure Firefox to save your
On Sat, 12 Feb 2022, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe things would work better with more swap, but I haven/t (and probably
won't try that) -- in the reasonably near future (maybe after tax season), I
plan to set up a new system with Debian 1 (whatever that is "code named").
increasing swap here
On Saturday, February 12, 2022 05:11:31 AM Curt wrote:
> Firefox may use more system resources if it's left open for long periods
> of time. A workaround for this is to periodically restart Firefox. You
> can configure Firefox to save your tabs and windows so that when you
> start it again, you
On 2022-02-12, piorunz wrote:
> On 11/02/2022 22:16, Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote:
>> Somewhere in their help or documentation they even say that you shouldn't
>> leave it running for extended periods of time.
>
> Never heard such a thing. Do you have source?
>
See my other post in this thread.
On 2022-02-11, Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote:
> On Friday 11 February 2022 11:06:01 am Celejar wrote:
>> I seem to have a serious memory leak on my system (Lenovo W550s) - the
>> memory usage seems to slowly but more or less steadily keep increasing.
>>
>> This is a more or less normal (I think) des
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 06:22:48PM +, piorunz wrote:
> On 11/02/2022 17:58, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>
> > It seems to be the fashion nowadays to leave one's web browser up 24/7,
> > with dozens of tabs open. Personally I can't understand this - I seldom
> > have more than two or three tabs open
On 11/02/2022 22:16, Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote:
Somewhere in their help or documentation they even say that you shouldn't leave
it running for extended periods of time.
Never heard such a thing. Do you have source?
--
With kindest regards, Piotr.
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian - The universal opera
On Friday 11 February 2022 11:06:01 am Celejar wrote:
> I seem to have a serious memory leak on my system (Lenovo W550s) - the
> memory usage seems to slowly but more or less steadily keep increasing.
>
> This is a more or less normal (I think) desktop installation of Sid,
> running Xfce4. Typical
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 15:00:39 -0500
Celejar wrote:
> There are several reasons I'm not ready to do that:
Fine, get another browser.
--
Does anybody read signatures any more?
https://charlescurley.com
https://charlescurley.com/blog/
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 15:57:58 -0500
Bijan Soleymani wrote:
> On 2022-02-11 14:52, Celejar wrote:
> > As I mentioned in another post, I do this occasionally, but I'm not
> > sure how to interpret the results. I just killed firefox; I got back
> > about 3.5 GB, but the system is still using about 4.
On 2022-02-11 14:52, Celejar wrote:
As I mentioned in another post, I do this occasionally, but I'm not
sure how to interpret the results. I just killed firefox; I got back
about 3.5 GB, but the system is still using about 4.8, and Xorg's usage
hasn't changed: ~ 4436M / 3081M / 105M.
Closing Fi
On 11/02/2022 18:40, Charles Curley wrote:
My solution is simple: I switched to Vivaldi over a year ago, and
haven't looked back. https://vivaldi.com. They have packages for
Debian, and run a roughly two week release cycle. It's based on
Chromium, but with better privacy settings for the default
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:40:15 -0700
Charles Curley wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 12:01:59 -0500
> Celejar wrote:
>
> > So I've heard. So is this something I just have to live with? Does
> > everyone have this problem?
>
> It is widely rumored, backed by experiments I've done here. I've not
> see
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 09:58:40 -0800
Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> On Fri Feb 11 09:43:03 2022 Celejar wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 09:53:17 -0700
> > Charles Curley wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:06:01 -0500
> >> Celejar wrote:
> >>
> >>> I seem to have a serious memory leak on my
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 18:06:52 +
piorunz wrote:
> On 11/02/2022 17:01, Celejar wrote:
> > So I've heard. So is this something I just have to live with? Does
> > everyone have this problem? I actually did used to kill firefox when I
> > was experiencing memory pressure - it certainly relieved th
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:43:55 -0500
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > I used to have 8 GB on the system, and it would start to thrash at
> > about 7+ GB usage. I recently ugrade to 16 GB; memory usage is
> > currently over 8 GB, and it seems to be slowly but steadily increasing.
>
> Presumably you bought
Stefan Monnier writes:
> I used to have 8 GB on the system, and it would start to thrash at
> about 7+ GB usage. I recently ugrade to 16 GB; memory usage is
> currently over 8 GB, and it seems to be slowly but steadily increasing.
Presumably you bought 16GB to make use of it, right?
So it's onl
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 12:01:59 -0500
Celejar wrote:
> So I've heard. So is this something I just have to live with? Does
> everyone have this problem?
It is widely rumored, backed by experiments I've done here. I've not
seen anything official from the Mozilla folks, but then I don't pay
close atte
On 11/02/2022 17:58, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
It seems to be the fashion nowadays to leave one's web browser up 24/7,
with dozens of tabs open. Personally I can't understand this - I seldom
have more than two or three tabs open at once, and most of the time I
have only one open, which is why I trea
On Fri Feb 11 09:43:03 2022 Celejar wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 09:53:17 -0700
> Charles Curley wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:06:01 -0500
>> Celejar wrote:
>>
>>> I seem to have a serious memory leak on my system (Lenovo W550s) -
>>> the memory usage seems to slowly but more or less stea
On 11/02/2022 17:01, Celejar wrote:
So I've heard. So is this something I just have to live with? Does
everyone have this problem? I actually did used to kill firefox when I
was experiencing memory pressure - it certainly relieved the immediate
problem, but I think I found that not all the memory
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 09:53:17 -0700
Charles Curley wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:06:01 -0500
> Celejar wrote:
>
> > I seem to have a serious memory leak on my system (Lenovo W550s) - the
> > memory usage seems to slowly but more or less steadily keep
> > increasing.
> >
> > This is a more or
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:06:01 -0500
Celejar wrote:
> I seem to have a serious memory leak on my system (Lenovo W550s) - the
> memory usage seems to slowly but more or less steadily keep
> increasing.
>
> This is a more or less normal (I think) desktop installation of Sid,
> running Xfce4. Typical
Jeetu Golani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For sometime, I've been feeling that there's a memory leak in one of
> the apps because after quite a few days of use KDE becomes
> slow. Apps I typically use are KMail,Konqueror,KMerlin,Konsole,K3B.
>
> I've noticed that memory seems to be consumed at an
Jeetu Golani said:
> I can't make much of it.is this normal?? doesn't look like it
> should.since I'm basically not turning on any programs...therefore
> something seems to be up...any help on either clarifying my
> understanding on the above or tracing the rogue program would be
> ap
"Jeetu Golani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a Debian 3.0 installation on my P4 2.2 512MB with 256MB Swap
> system. I use KDE 3.1.
>
> For sometime, I've been feeling that there's a memory leak in one of
> the apps because after quite a few days of use KDE becomes
> slow. Apps I typically u
On 30-May-2002 nate wrote:
> not a critical issue yet, but i have noticed when using
> pam on cyrus(with ldap), memory on pwcheck goes way up,
> currently at 80MB. if i restart it, it starts off at 1500kb
> or so and quickly gets to 20-30MB then eventually 50MB ..then slowly
> grows more
"Neil L. Roeth" wrote:
> There are no big processes, but something is using up 70MB of memory!
> Any ideas what?
The kernel is using your free memory for disk caching etc... it's
normal. It'll be available to applications when required.
In a message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Something that I'm running is leaking memory like crazy. How do I
| find this memory leak and more importantly, how does one fix it? I
| have 128Meg of memory on the system and when I first boot up, the
| system has 99Meg free. After running for a day or tw
I don't know if I'm still on the list as we had problems with our mail
server last night. I am using kernel 2.0.33.
Dennis
--
dpk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Network Administrator | work: 353.4844
Division of Engineering Computing Services | page: 222.5875
On 9 Mar 1998, Jens Ritter wrote:
> O
Hi,
I confirmed that the high CPU load was due to a hung tcsh process. When I
returned to my computer after 4 hours and logged in again, I noticed a
tcsh process running for four hours. After killing it, the CPU load
dropped from being over 50% user to under 3% user. What's with the hung
shell
Ossama Othman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Since my hamm install, I have noticed that when users log out, sometimes
> > there shell hangs. These processes then beging utilizing lots of memory
> > and cpu. Once uptime reported a load of 4.05 from this! Killing the
> > processes resumes a more
Hi,
> Since my hamm install, I have noticed that when users log out, sometimes
> there shell hangs. These processes then beging utilizing lots of memory
> and cpu. Once uptime reported a load of 4.05 from this! Killing the
> processes resumes a more desired load.
Well, as far as I can tell (fr
Since my hamm install, I have noticed that when users log out, sometimes
there shell hangs. These processes then beging utilizing lots of memory
and cpu. Once uptime reported a load of 4.05 from this! Killing the
processes resumes a more desired load.
Dennis
--
dpk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Network
Joe Piche writes:
-> I have a big problem with the latest debian distribution (2.6?).
-> I find that it will begin to swap like crazy after awhile.
-> This problem was not in the debian I was running before.
->
-> My system is a:
-> 486 SX/25, 4 MB ram, 645 MB maxtor ESDI drive w/ Ultrastor 12F
47 matches
Mail list logo
