>| On Sat, 18 May 2002 14:51:46 -0700 Paul Scott ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
>| | Mozilla displays this message perfectly and >both levels of ">" are in
>| | the message source here.
>
>Both? There's 3 (or more) levels of indents >there with only 2 levels
>of '>'.
>
>| >==
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 09:32:57AM -0700, Soul Computer wrote:
| On Sat, 18 May 2002 14:51:46 -0700 Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
| | Mozilla displays this message perfectly and both levels of ">" are in
| | the message source here.
Both? There's 3 (or more) levels of indents there wi
On Sat, 18 May 2002 14:51:46 -0700 Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Vineet Kumar wrote:
> * Soul Computer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020518 13:21]:
>
>>On 17 May 2002 21:04:09 -0500 Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>On Fri, 2002-05-17 at 20:05, Soul Computer wrote:
>>
>>>Maybe this
On 18 May 2002 15:50:41 -0500 Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 2002-05-18 at 15:27, Soul Computer wrote:
> n Fri, 17 May 2002 22:40:39 -0700 (PDT) Elizabeth Barham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> --- Soul Computer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Maybe this is a bad idea, but I thou
I guess Soul Computer<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uses some web mail
interface his ISP provides at their SUN server (reading from mail
header). his quoting is confusing to me too. Maybe it is ISP's falt.
I would recommends "Soul Computer" to start using real MUA on Linux :)
On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 02:51
Vineet Kumar wrote:
> * Soul Computer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020518 13:21]:
>
>>On 17 May 2002 21:04:09 -0500 Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>On Fri, 2002-05-17 at 20:05, Soul Computer wrote:
>>
>>>Maybe this is a bad idea, but I thought that
>>>since Linux is the original multi-user,
>>
On Sat, 2002-05-18 at 15:27, Soul Computer wrote:
> n Fri, 17 May 2002 22:40:39 -0700 (PDT) Elizabeth Barham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> --- Soul Computer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Maybe this is a bad idea, but I thought that
> > since Linux is the original multi-user,
> > multitasking
* Soul Computer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020518 13:21]:
> On 17 May 2002 21:04:09 -0500 Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2002-05-17 at 20:05, Soul Computer wrote:
> > Maybe this is a bad idea, but I thought that
> > since Linux is the original multi-user,
> > multitasking operating s
n Fri, 17 May 2002 22:40:39 -0700 (PDT) Elizabeth Barham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
--- Soul Computer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe this is a bad idea, but I thought that
> since Linux is the original multi-user,
> multitasking operating system for the PC, it
> could be used to do some reall
On 17 May 2002 21:04:09 -0500 Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2002-05-17 at 20:05, Soul Computer wrote:
> Maybe this is a bad idea, but I thought that
> since Linux is the original multi-user,
> multitasking operating system for the PC, it
Fat chance. MP/M (the multi-user variant
--- Soul Computer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe this is a bad idea, but I thought that
> since Linux is the original multi-user,
> multitasking operating system for the PC, it
> could be used to do some really neat stuff. What
> I had in mind for those of you who could afford
> it was the pur
On Fri, 2002-05-17 at 20:05, Soul Computer wrote:
> Maybe this is a bad idea, but I thought that
> since Linux is the original multi-user,
> multitasking operating system for the PC, it
Fat chance. MP/M (the multi-user variant of CP/M was
running on 8080s & Z-80s (8 bit processors!!) back in the
12 matches
Mail list logo
